ARE MOST TEAMS TOO RISKY FOR THIS

Started by eaglesman, February 22, 2010, 04:28:21 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

eaglesman

is it just to darn risky playing 2 rookie mids this season??????

i think most ppl would have martin as a lock in their side.

but is it too risky to lock in scully, trengove, morabito as a rookie mid?????

I had trengove and martin as lock ins before the nab cup but after seeing scully for the first time i made the switch to scully and martin. But i am wondering whether this is a good idea and whether i should play martin as the only rookie mid and select a cheap more known player????????

I have the scope to do so as I have buddy in the forward line and have thought about downgrading him for the cheap freeing up 100k and adding it to scully to select someone like daniel kerr???????????

what are your thoughts

Justin Bieber

not too risky since i'm going with a 3 rookie mid. all the rookie cash cows this year are in the mid. rather play rookies on field in the mids than in the forwards/backs this year imo.

Alex7089

Yeah there doesn't seem to be any rookies of value outside of the mids, I'm starting Martin and Trengrove in my team with A.Moore the only other rookie playing and I'm trying to get rid of him for a cheap cos there is just nothing