DT Talk Thread #4 - Your must have players!

Started by Kodboys, February 12, 2013, 08:21:34 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Kodboys

Who are some of you must have players! That are looking to score between 70+ for me personally i have 5 must have players!


1. D.Swan/G.Ablett: If you don't have one of them on your team.. then ... well .. yeah.

2.B.Gibbs: he's getting pushed into the mid.. im 100% he will have an amazing year. Don't expect him to tag much cause Malthouse isn't much of a coach who enjoys that.

3.Pendlebury: Consistent. Always always consistent. Dependable  player and always have been!

4.B.Goddard: Goddard at a team like Essendon where there's only 1 consistent 95+ player other than him.. he will smash scores..

5.T.Walker: Tippett is gone.. I have a feeling Walker will be unstoppable this year.. but that's if the Mullet stays :D


So in my opinion these are players that im sure i won't be taking out of my team! So tell me what are yours ? :)

Noz

Must have players? Walker? Tbags gotten to you  ::)

m1tch robo

First four I agree with. I'd probably say tex is more of a smokie rather than someone that you must have. I'm gonna add luenberger to the must haves with a subject to pre round 1 fitness clause. Lots of upside from a scoring and cash generation perspective.

Jroo

Quote from: Noz on February 12, 2013, 08:28:07 PM
Must have players? Walker? Tbags gotten to you  ::)
Haha! Yep Tbag has gotten to him!
I'd say
1. Swan
2. Cox
3. Gibbs
4. Cotchin
5. Leuneberger (if fit)
In no particular order

elephants

Yeah, Tex is a good Smokey more than a must have imo.
Also, don't think Cotchin is really a must have either. Heaps of premo mid options.

Can see why people would mention them, both should have solid years.

My opinion...

Swan/Ablett/Both
Pendles
Gibbs
Goddard
Rockliff

:)

Noz

I would actually go towards a rookie point and say Viney would have to be close to a lock.

Jroo

Quote from: elephants on February 12, 2013, 09:01:36 PM
Yeah, Tex is a good Smokey more than a must have imo.
Also, don't think Cotchin is really a must have either. Heaps of premo mid options.

Can see why people would mention them, both should have solid years.

My opinion...

Swan/Ablett/Both
Pendles
Gibbs
Goddard
Rockliff

:)
Oh yeah forgot about Rockliff, but yeah he's a must have.
Goddard is pretty close to a must have as well

Ziplock

I reckon leuen and cox are both must haves as well  if fit for round 1...

The_Captain

Quote from: Ziplock on February 12, 2013, 09:28:33 PM
I reckon leuen and cox are both must haves as well  if fit for round 1...

Cox could pump out some massive scores wit no nic nat for first few games !

Jukes

in order,
1. Gibbs
2. Rocky
3. Goddard
4. Wines- kid is a gun will average 80+.
5. Leuenberger

If you don't have the first three you're already back a bit, next two you should defs have unless they don't fit your structure.

Football Factory

Swan/Ablett
Pendles
Goddard
Gibbs
Cox
Rockliff
Leuenberger

Jalapeno

Quote from: FOOTBALL FACTORY on February 12, 2013, 09:35:26 PM
Swan/Ablett
Pendles
Goddard
Gibbs
Cox
Rockliff
Leuenberger

I dont really agree that pendles is a must have.... I personally think both beams and boyd with average better this season.

Also have a funny feeling that leuenberger will end up becoming a mega let down.

Otherwise i completely agree and think that without the majority of these guys in your team people will be in struggle town

Adamant

In order:

1. Swan/Ablett (Both)
2. Rockliff
3. Gibbs
4. Pendles
5. Leuenberger

The noticeable player missing is Goddard. He is a lock, but I don't think is a must have to start with.

The_Captain

Quote from: Adamant on February 12, 2013, 10:04:19 PM
In order:

1. Swan/Ablett (Both)
2. Rockliff
3. Gibbs
4. Pendles
5. Goddard

Chuck Leuy into that list and its perfect!!!

Adamant

Quote from: noto07 on February 12, 2013, 10:05:26 PM
Quote from: Adamant on February 12, 2013, 10:04:19 PM
In order:

1. Swan/Ablett (Both)
2. Rockliff
3. Gibbs
4. Pendles
5. Goddard

Chuck Leuy into that list and its perfect!!!

:o

I edited my post pretty much straight away (before I saw your comment) and put Luey in there. It says that it's not edited, so you can tell I'm not lying haha.