Opinions on the best team ever?

[supercoachheroes]

B: Enright, H.Shaw, Fisher, Hodge, Kenelly, Malceski, Ladson, (Moore. Maguire)

M: Swan, Ball, Carazzo, Trengrove, Morabito, Martin (Mcveigh, Palmer)

R; Jolly, Naitanui (Warnock, Lobbe)

F: Petrie, Sylvia, Tippet, Hurley, Cloke, Ziebell, Dennis-Lane (Gumbleton, Franklin)

This is my team for Round 1 will put mcveigh and franklin on field when there not suspended, and hopefully palmer before the leagues start

[AlphaMale]

Horrendous

[jmonte11]

this team is that bad.
you will lose to an auto fill side.
get rid of : swan, ball, carrazo, mcveigh, palmer
nic nat, cloke, petrie, enright, maguire, hurley. bang and your team is still "horendous"

[supercoachheroes]

well you clearly have no idea what youare talking about, i will highligh a few reasons
Voss has said maguire is in the best 22 therfor he will play and prived at 114 he has to raise unless he averages in the minuses, and he is on my bench so whats it matter if he misses a few? if you are telling me to get rid of ball you obivously didnt watch him on friday, and even if it is nab cup they both had strong teams, and yyou look at nic nats statistics then give me ONE good reason why i should not have him

[jmonte11]

i rekon sam butler would slot in nicely into this team..along with bret peake...fits the trend

[Pozzato]

Nic Nat rucked against a dismall Essendon ruck attack without Ryder and Hille even Sam Jacobs would of chopped against that pair, Nic Nat is an impact player he will get 100 once every 8 games and will average less that 60, also Malceski are you serious he was fully fit most of last year and struggled all year there are a lot better options around that price

[supercoachheroes]

you have to look at the stats not in the ruck!! he had very goood statistics if you take away his 20 hit outs or something he still gets 150+ points, how about we wait and see because none of us can tell the future otherwise jmonte11 wouldnt have such a bad DT team

[jmonte11]

nah your wrong...i saw the future

[supercoachheroes]

oh good, bet you changed every single player on your team

[Adsspinner]

GUMBERTON wont play if he get minutes it wont be much to injury prone try
ROCKLIFF scored 140 plus in nab and cost 109,200 good bet

I agree mguire is a keeper ???

Jetta , Trengrove.................. not Palmer

Warncock had a shocker too gumby ????

Ports Lobbe going to have first crak at the N0 1 i would bench him

Cheers mine is posted Adsspinner check it for me !!

[HillHero13]

what stats for nic nat the game in the nab cup...


mate think about it he dominated because of no competition don't go by scores they scored in the nab cup coz teams dont really try in it...


perfect example rockliff... he score 140 or so but against bulldogs.. with so many players to come in is he in thier best 22 probably not go gumby yes his injury prone but his in the best 22...

you want to go to someone who is injury prone and in the best 22 than someone that isnt and scored good in nab cup..

cheers
HillHero13

[supercoachheroes]

i stole them off someones post but these stats!!
Nic Nats stats last week against bombers, 18 disposals 83%eff, 4 goals on quality backmen, 8 tackles, 16 contested possetions, 7 clearances, 3 inside 50's with only 63% gametime

Ok so take away his 21 hitouts if you dont think he could have won any against Hille and Ryder!

[nichw07]

terrible :'(

[HillHero13]

not just hit outs but people who can contest him around the ground like ryder

[supercoachheroes]

ryder will not change efficiency (major key in SC) nor will he change tackles and i would say naitanui is a better mover and wouldnt change the possessions much either, clearances are also big in SC and essendon had their good midfielders playing...