andrew embley

[ando_10]

looks an absolute bargain and we all know what he is capable of. thoughts on maybe as a 5th mid?

[Hagebear]

I think I'd take Luke Ball over Embley. Ball SC, Embley DT imo.

[Grazz]

Been in and out of my team and currently back in it. Could be a very handy pickup for cash but the vest seems a concern for alot of coaches ive noticed which does have me a little concerned tbh but im thinking with Kerrs setback he may be safe from the vest for a few games if it is an issue at all. He's having a great preseason by all reports and if he can get back to his form of old well who knows how much money he can make you. Could make going to an Ultra-Prem easy. For me its between him and Ball still or i could still choose niether and go with an ultra-prem and a rookie instead. Mid rooks look the best options. Decisions decisions. :-\

[FOOTY IS BACK]

The strategy of premiums and rookies alone will not work this year! The new rookies are guaranteed to be wearing a vest whether its green or red.................. ball and embley are a must in the midfield........... 1-2 rookies (max) on the ground in the mids or face more than half the season getting shafted by the VEST! 

More likely for a rookie mid to get vested than a rookie defender or forward.

[LF]

I think I'd take Luke Ball over Embley. Ball SC, Embley DT imo.

Not really much difference between either of them in Dreamteam and Supercoach.

Andrew Embley
Supercoach                                                           
Year   Games   Average                                 
2006   20   82.5
2007   11   80.7
2008   21   93.7
2009   21   87.1
2010   20   92.4
2011   21   94.0
2012   6   57.0

Dreamteam
2005   15   93.9
2006   20   82.5
2007   11   80.7
2008   21   93.7
2009   21   87.1
2010   20   92.4
2011   21   94.0
2012   6   57.0

Luke Ball
Supercoach
2005   22   116.1
2006   20   93.3
2007   18   86.6
2008   18   99.6
2009   17   86.1
2010   20   89.6
2011   21   97.9
2012   3   62.7

Dreamteam
2005   22   94.1
2006   20   89.9
2007   18   83.0
2008   18   91.8
2009   17   83.4
2010   20   92.6
2011   21   96.3
2012   3   74.0