Ask Ziplock Pre-season

Started by Ziplock, February 04, 2013, 03:47:55 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Ziplock

Quote from: stew42 on March 26, 2013, 07:26:41 PM
Just wanting your opinion on Stevens (esp. with Boydos out) vs Whitfield.

ehhh... tbh, I think they'll average pretty similar. That being said, stevens larger body means he'll be able to handle the rigours of AFL a bit better than whitfield, and he probs wont get subbed either.

Ziplock

Quote from: Dudge on March 26, 2013, 07:39:29 PM
Zip continuing Stews question, how close will those 2 score to Maloney. Fair bit of money to be spent elsewhere if you think they would be close - cheers mate

I'm backing moloney in for a 90+ average atm, compared to stevens/ whitfield who'll probably top out around 80 odd.

Dudge

Quote from: Ziplock on March 26, 2013, 07:51:53 PM
Quote from: Dudge on March 26, 2013, 07:39:29 PM
Zip continuing Stews question, how close will those 2 score to Maloney. Fair bit of money to be spent elsewhere if you think they would be close - cheers mate

I'm backing moloney in for a 90+ average atm, compared to stevens/ whitfield who'll probably top out around 80 odd.

Fair enough Zip but would the price rise be worth the loss of 10+ points early?

Ziplock

Quote from: Dudge on March 26, 2013, 08:19:44 PM
Quote from: Ziplock on March 26, 2013, 07:51:53 PM
Quote from: Dudge on March 26, 2013, 07:39:29 PM
Zip continuing Stews question, how close will those 2 score to Maloney. Fair bit of money to be spent elsewhere if you think they would be close - cheers mate

I'm backing moloney in for a 90+ average atm, compared to stevens/ whitfield who'll probably top out around 80 odd.

Fair enough Zip but would the price rise be worth the loss of 10+ points early?
atm I have moloney, my reasoning being that I can draw a lot of parallels between him and tuck- I think he's worth at least a 90 avg, but could easily go up to 100. 

essendon2

Moloney + Blicavs (r2) + Martin
vs
K.Mitchell + Longer + Chapman


Do you think Mitchell will be the sub? :-\

Ziplock

Quote from: essendon2 on March 26, 2013, 09:26:32 PM
Moloney 90 + Blicavs (r2) 60 + Martin (dustin?) 90= 240
vs
K.Mitchell 80 + Longer 70 + Chapman 95= 245


Do you think Mitchell will be the sub? :-\
pretty much an even split. Option 1 for me though.

I don't think mitchell will be subbed- a large part of his game is his elite endurance, I think as a sub that he'd be wasted.

Adamant


Ricochet


Ziplock


Ziplock


Ricochet


Adamant

Yeah, reasoning please Zip? :)

elephants

Bloody hell, demanding lot you boys :P

Ziplock

Quote from: Ziplock on March 27, 2013, 01:36:10 AM
Quote from: Adamant on March 27, 2013, 01:01:48 AM
Jelwood or Murphy, Zip?
Jelwood
I've been losing a lot of confidence in murphy recently with his tagibility, especially with judd declining so much. I rate jelwood asa more consistent option, with a better chance of going around 108+.

Ziplock

Quote from: Ziplock on March 27, 2013, 01:37:15 AM
Quote from: Ricochet on March 27, 2013, 01:17:01 AM
Chappy v Bartel
chapman
I've gone chapman basically because of bartels scoring pattern- since 2007 his scores have decreased every year. Both have proved to score 110+, bartel may be more durable (in recent years it's been about the same), but chapman has been showing less of a slide.