Ask Ziplock Pre-season

Started by Ziplock, February 04, 2013, 03:47:55 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Toga


essendon2

Grimes + Roughead
vs
Grimes + Ryder
vs
Grimes + McEvoy
vs
Heppell + Maric
vs
Hartlett + Maric

Ziplock

Quote from: essendon2 on March 09, 2013, 04:21:19 PM
Grimes 95 + Roughead 92
vs
Grimes 95 + Ryder 88
vs
Grimes 95 + McEvoy 90
vs
Heppell 90 + Maric 95
vs
Hartlett 88 + Maric 95

that puts grimes and roughead ahead by my count. That being said, I'd probably go Heppell and Maric :P

RookieDTer

Which order, with reasons :)?
DOcherty, Colq, STevenson, Terlich.

For me, Terlich, Stevenson, DOcherty/Colq

essendon2

Beams + Pittard + Goodes + Karnezis
vs
Vlastuin + Hartlett + (any DEF sub 456k) + Macaffer

Ziplock

Quote from: RookieDTer on March 09, 2013, 04:35:04 PM
Which order, with reasons :)?
DOcherty, Colq, STevenson, Terlich.

For me, Terlich, Stevenson, DOcherty/Colq
I would have gone Stevenson, Docherty, Terlich, Colq

Terlichs JS just isnt as good as stevensons or dochertys imo.

Ziplock

Quote from: essendon2 on March 09, 2013, 05:10:35 PM
Beams 110 + Pittard 65 + Goodes 93 + Karnezis 75 = 343
vs
Vlastuin 60 + Hartlett 88 +  heppell(any DEF sub 456k) 90 + Macaffer 70= 308


pommyadam


essendon2

Quote from: Ziplock on March 09, 2013, 05:29:55 PM
Quote from: essendon2 on March 09, 2013, 05:10:35 PM
Beams 110 + Pittard 65 + Goodes 93 + Karnezis 75 = 343
vs
Vlastuin 60 + Hartlett 88 +  heppell(any DEF sub 456k) 90 + Macaffer 70= 308
Beams only 110... after averaging 116 last season?
Goodes - I meant B.Goodes  :P



Ziplock

Selwood for consistency, Swallow as more of a unique.

I personally dont think selwood can hit 110 in his current team.

Ziplock

Quote from: essendon2 on March 09, 2013, 05:35:47 PM
Quote from: Ziplock on March 09, 2013, 05:29:55 PM
Quote from: essendon2 on March 09, 2013, 05:10:35 PM
Beams 110 + Pittard 65 + Goodes 70 + Karnezis 75 = 320
vs
Vlastuin 60 + Hartlett 88 +  heppell(any DEF sub 456k) 90 + Macaffer 70= 308
Beams only 110... after averaging 116 last season?
Goodes - I meant B.Goodes  :P

fixed :P

essendon2

Swallow (m5) + Macaffer (f6) (patton f7)
vs
Whitfield (m4) + Cox (r1)

(got Roughead)

elephants

Is the Swan-Beams-Pendles trifecta silly to start with? They have a pretty tough start and chances are one of them will dip...?

Ziplock

Quote from: essendon2 on March 09, 2013, 05:46:44 PM
Swallow (m5) 108 + Macaffer (f6) 70 (patton f7)= 178
vs
Whitfield (m4) 80 + Cox (r1) 103= 183

(got Roughead)
whitfield + cox for me.

Ziplock

Quote from: elephants on March 10, 2013, 05:09:34 AM
Is the Swan-Beams-Pendles trifecta silly to start with? They have a pretty tough start and chances are one of them will dip...?

well, I still don't rate beams for DT, so... yes :P

the other issue is that during the bye round you're going to get screwed in your midfield :P