Ball or Embley?

Started by its me lads, February 03, 2013, 08:52:22 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Ball or Embley?

Ball
Embley
Print
Go Down Pages1
User actions

its me lads

February 03, 2013, 08:52:22 PM
I'm not sure if there has been a poll made but surely people are wondering. Luke Ball or Andrew Embley.

Embley is significantly cheaper and I think they will both have similar out-put. thoughts?

Chelskiman

#1
February 03, 2013, 08:53:27 PM
Quote from: its me lads on February 03, 2013, 08:52:22 PM
Embley is significantly cheaper and I think they will both have similar out-put. thoughts?

Basically answered your own question.

Holz

#2
February 03, 2013, 08:54:09 PM
I would go Ball if they were the same price but only just. Huge price difference so Embley easy. When I look at Balls price to me i can just see spending the extra 100k on bringing in a true premo. Embley is really only 100k more than the top rookies.

Football Factory

#3
February 03, 2013, 08:55:31 PM
Taco girl   ;D    :-X


To bring in a true premo Holz you will need an extra 200k


I voted Embley because i cant vote for both

its me lads

#4
February 03, 2013, 08:59:01 PM
Quote from: Chelskiman on February 03, 2013, 08:53:27 PM
Quote from: its me lads on February 03, 2013, 08:52:22 PM
Embley is significantly cheaper and I think they will both have similar out-put. thoughts?

Basically answered your own question.

Yes I did but i'm keen to see what others have to say, Luke Ball being 28 and Embley 31 could have an effect but who knows.

Quote from: Holzman on February 03, 2013, 08:54:09 PM
I would go Ball if they were the same price but only just. Huge price difference so Embley easy. When I look at Balls price to me i can just see spending the extra 100k on bringing in a true premo. Embley is really only 100k more than the top rookies.

True


Adamant

#5
February 03, 2013, 09:09:32 PM
It really depends on how you use the leftover 80k or so.

Ball will average around 5 more, but Embley at his price is the better option.

henry

#6
February 03, 2013, 09:12:27 PM
Yeah Embley pretty comfortably out of those two due to price,

Presto

#7
February 03, 2013, 09:17:22 PM
Where is the option "Both"?

nostradamus

#8
February 03, 2013, 09:21:09 PM
l think its a mistake to be deciding between the 2. Judge them on their individual value for money and projected scoring ability

......both are definate starters for me  ;)

jobe#4

#9
February 04, 2013, 11:43:02 AM

Kellogscrunchynut

#10
February 04, 2013, 12:16:13 PM
I can only fit one in my team and since Embely is cheaper he gets the nod.

Ricochet

#11
February 04, 2013, 01:00:26 PM
Has to be Ball imo
Loves playing North, has Carlton next and even loves Hawks.
He has the ability to hit 3x110+ scores in the first 3 rounds
Print
Go Up Pages1
User actions