Main Menu

Kieran Jack?

Started by ben lauchlin, February 02, 2013, 02:53:36 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

ben lauchlin

Exploded last season and he may keep getting better. But is he worth the 600k starting price?

kilbluff1985

in my current team, he is worth it and plays GC/GWS in first 2 rounds he scores well against them

Jay

*Kieren

And yes he is, absolute beast. His 2nd half of the year was worth a 630k starting price...

Sabretooth Tigers

Good player, but I wonder. If money were no object would you take Kennedy or Jack in you starting line up ??? At present I have Kennedy. Cheers.

shorty3264

from round 8 onwards he averaged 123. Enough said. He's a jet.

SydneyRox

i may be slightly biast, bur i am toying with the idea of JPK and Jack to start. Both should score well,  but both can become murphy,ball , embley etc round 3 or 4

Samm79

Quote from: SydneyRox on February 02, 2013, 07:38:38 PM
i may be slightly biast, bur i am toying with the idea of JPK and Jack to start. Both should score well,  but both can become murphy,ball , embley etc round 3 or 4

Funny you should say that, as I am currently starting Jack and ROK, both came home like freight trains and will be disappointed if I cannot get an average of 235 out of the two of them. Considering starting JPK but have the extra cash to get Swan, and I just cannot bring myself to have 3 Swans mids, even though there is no reason not to....

SydneyRox

Quote from: Samm79 on February 03, 2013, 12:40:13 AM
Quote from: SydneyRox on February 02, 2013, 07:38:38 PM
i may be slightly biast, bur i am toying with the idea of JPK and Jack to start. Both should score well,  but both can become murphy,ball , embley etc round 3 or 4

Funny you should say that, as I am currently starting Jack and ROK, both came home like freight trains and will be disappointed if I cannot get an average of 235 out of the two of them. Considering starting JPK but have the extra cash to get Swan, and I just cannot bring myself to have 3 Swans mids, even though there is no reason not to....

love him, but i am not sure ROK will start that well. He, Goodes and Bolton all need to manage their load and aim to be peaking for finals.

Samm79

Quote from: SydneyRox on February 03, 2013, 12:49:49 AM
Quote from: Samm79 on February 03, 2013, 12:40:13 AM
Quote from: SydneyRox on February 02, 2013, 07:38:38 PM
i may be slightly biast, bur i am toying with the idea of JPK and Jack to start. Both should score well,  but both can become murphy,ball , embley etc round 3 or 4

Funny you should say that, as I am currently starting Jack and ROK, both came home like freight trains and will be disappointed if I cannot get an average of 235 out of the two of them. Considering starting JPK but have the extra cash to get Swan, and I just cannot bring myself to have 3 Swans mids, even though there is no reason not to....

love him, but i am not sure ROK will start that well. He, Goodes and Bolton all need to manage their load and aim to be peaking for finals.

I think you are on the money with Jude and Goodes, but hope you're wrong about ROK. Training the house down, top 5 (from memory) finish in the 3km time trial and his inside role now just screams a 120 average.. Starting to doubt myself now though!

Jay

Quote from: Samm79 on February 03, 2013, 12:56:36 AM
Quote from: SydneyRox on February 03, 2013, 12:49:49 AM
Quote from: Samm79 on February 03, 2013, 12:40:13 AM
Quote from: SydneyRox on February 02, 2013, 07:38:38 PM
i may be slightly biast, bur i am toying with the idea of JPK and Jack to start. Both should score well,  but both can become murphy,ball , embley etc round 3 or 4

Funny you should say that, as I am currently starting Jack and ROK, both came home like freight trains and will be disappointed if I cannot get an average of 235 out of the two of them. Considering starting JPK but have the extra cash to get Swan, and I just cannot bring myself to have 3 Swans mids, even though there is no reason not to....

love him, but i am not sure ROK will start that well. He, Goodes and Bolton all need to manage their load and aim to be peaking for finals.

I think you are on the money with Jude and Goodes, but hope you're wrong about ROK. Training the house down, top 5 (from memory) finish in the 3km time trial and his inside role now just screams a 120 average.. Starting to doubt myself now though!
By any chance do you mean JPK? Cant see ROK pulling a 120avg

Samm79

I am talking about ROK. From round 8 forward last year he averaged 119 if my maths is correct. Playing a different role than he use to, is now an inside mid, racking up contested possessions, tackles and clearances.

Has missed 3 games in 8 years, priced at a 103 average, I struggle to find better value within 100K. Mind you, I may be biased but he is one of my first picked this year...

Capper

yeh ROK finished 4th but Bolton also finished 9th so dont tkae your eyes off JB.

ROK was also used as a spare player behind the ball in the 3rd and 4th quarter in the last half of the season.

jimmyh

anyone concerned he may be used as a stopper again in stages of 2013.. swallow rd 3, jelwood rd 4 etc etc...?

i want him in but this has me unsure

Swan Fan

I am very biased, but would love to have all 3 in my starting line up, at the moment I have Kennedy and Jack... McVeigh is another one to consider... all should tear it up in the first 3 rounds...    :P

jimmyh

Quote from: Swan Fan on February 23, 2013, 06:03:02 PM
I am very biased, but would love to have all 3 in my starting line up, at the moment I have Kennedy and Jack... McVeigh is another one to consider... all should tear it up in the first 3 rounds...    :P

Kennedy has been a lock since opening day, but Jack has just snuck up on me.. and now I'm making room for him  ::)