Master Q - Trophy Collectors - Feedback Appreciated

Master Q · February 01, 2013, 09:56:20 PM

Team 1.1

What do you guys think about my first draft?

Team Notes:

- Rookies obviously harder to pick without seeing NAB cup - but still would like to see your thoughts.
- Terlich was cleared of any serious injuries.
- NRoo is only for the first few weeks. GC, Rich and GWS is a very easy first three games.
- Still unsure on Goldstein and Witts
- Aware that backline is a little weak.
- 100k free

Cheers Guys!

Jukes · February 01, 2013, 10:01:23 PM

Backs: 8/10
Mids: 8/10
Rucks: 8/10
Forwards: 8.75/10

Overall: 8.2/10

Master Q · February 01, 2013, 10:05:03 PM

Just updated team. Chappy which was probably a bad choice to Pav. Now 100k free.

Capper · February 01, 2013, 10:06:46 PM

you are a couple of players short to my knowledge, about 30 of them

Cicjose · February 01, 2013, 10:08:30 PM

you might want to check your image tags again

Master Q · February 01, 2013, 10:13:28 PM

Quote from: tabs on February 01, 2013, 10:06:46 PM
you are a couple of players short to my knowledge, about 30 of them

Quote from: Cicjose on February 01, 2013, 10:08:30 PM
you might want to check your image tags again

Fixed ::) ::) ::)

Capper · February 01, 2013, 10:15:57 PM

Pretty solid team there Q, im not sold on Embley any more so maybe upgrade Embley and Ball to Watson and a Rookie

stew42 · February 01, 2013, 10:20:32 PM

Quote from: tabs on February 01, 2013, 10:15:57 PM
Pretty solid team there Q, im not sold on Embley any more so maybe upgrade Embley and Ball to Watson and a Rookie

Why not tabs? I just changed Murphy and Jesse Lonergan to Ball and Embley...

mezzoculo · February 01, 2013, 10:54:42 PM

Quote from: stew42 on February 01, 2013, 10:20:32 PM
Quote from: tabs on February 01, 2013, 10:15:57 PM
Pretty solid team there Q, im not sold on Embley any more so maybe upgrade Embley and Ball to Watson and a Rookie
Why not tabs? I just changed Murphy and Jesse Lonergan to Ball and Embley...

Stick with Embley!! He's got a great record over the last few seasons and - sightly dodgy shoulder aside - has great durability. If he's not best 22 then I'll eat my pixels.
Ball on the other hand... perhaps go up to a premium or down to a top shelf cashcow (Wines and Lonergan). To get the extra $$$ fora premium you couuld perhaps ditch NRoo (who still isn't 100% fit) for a sub $300k player...

Master Q · February 01, 2013, 11:11:01 PM

Quote from: mezzoculo on February 01, 2013, 10:54:42 PM
Quote from: stew42 on February 01, 2013, 10:20:32 PM
Quote from: tabs on February 01, 2013, 10:15:57 PM
Pretty solid team there Q, im not sold on Embley any more so maybe upgrade Embley and Ball to Watson and a Rookie
Why not tabs? I just changed Murphy and Jesse Lonergan to Ball and Embley...
Stick with Embley!! He's got a great record over the last few seasons and - sightly dodgy shoulder aside - has great durability. If he's not best 22 then I'll eat my pixels.
Ball on the other hand... perhaps go up to a premium or down to a top shelf cashcow (Wines and Lonergan). To get the extra $$$ fora premium you couuld perhaps ditch NRoo (who still isn't 100% fit) for a sub $300k player...

Thanks for your feedback. Yeah I am sold on Embley. Could upgrade Ball I guess, already got Lonergan though and Wines is a but pricy. Will consider it though.

I am sold on NRoo - bit of a POD. Been against the past few years but GC, Tigers then GWS for his first 3 games is irresistible. He's not about the value but points.

mezzoculo · February 01, 2013, 11:35:42 PM

Quote from: Master Q on February 01, 2013, 11:11:01 PM
I am sold on NRoo - bit of a POD. Been against the past few years but GC, Tigers then GWS for his first 3 games is irresistible. He's not about the value but points.

If its not about value then why not look at a Swans player? They have GWS, GCS and Nth in their first three. As crazy as this sounds, Craig Bird offers great scores (for his price).

Jukes · February 01, 2013, 11:59:38 PM

Quote from: mezzoculo on February 01, 2013, 11:35:42 PM
Quote from: Master Q on February 01, 2013, 11:11:01 PM
I am sold on NRoo - bit of a POD. Been against the past few years but GC, Tigers then GWS for his first 3 games is irresistible. He's not about the value but points.
If its not about value then why not look at a Swans player? They have GWS, GCS and Nth in their first three. As crazy as this sounds, Craig Bird offers great scores (for his price).

Swans are known for playing quite anti-DT football, if guys like ROK and Jack were at a DT-friendly side such as Hawks or Pies they'd be averaging 110-115.

Sainters are much more positive for DT, and Riewoldt should be a great early starter, and Montagna ;)

Footy_Boiz · February 02, 2013, 12:08:54 AM

Good looking side. Had Pavlich all last season and came home strong but are you sure he can maintain it this year again? I'm sure he can but he is getting older

Master Q · February 02, 2013, 12:15:17 AM

Quote from: mezzoculo on February 01, 2013, 11:35:42 PM
Quote from: Master Q on February 01, 2013, 11:11:01 PM
I am sold on NRoo - bit of a POD. Been against the past few years but GC, Tigers then GWS for his first 3 games is irresistible. He's not about the value but points.
If its not about value then why not look at a Swans player? They have GWS, GCS and Nth in their first three. As crazy as this sounds, Craig Bird offers great scores (for his price).

Couldn't make myself pick Goodes, and ROK is now a pure mid which is kinda annoying. Jack is another option, but didn't think he is worth the risk.

Quote from: Footy_Boiz on February 02, 2013, 12:08:54 AM
Good looking side. Had Pavlich all last season and came home strong but are you sure he can maintain it this year again? I'm sure he can but he is getting older

Thanks for the feedback. I had Pav all last season too. TBH I wasn't set on him this year but there weren't really many other options, hopefully he performs.

nrich102 · February 02, 2013, 10:59:50 AM

Looks good master Q. I think you need another premo mid though.

8.5/10