Who's Picking Who - DT

Started by Mr.Craig, February 01, 2013, 05:51:25 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

jamfrank

Quote from: Ricochet on June 05, 2013, 04:33:43 PM
Still don't think its a good decision to bring Mitchell in early

+1. The golden rule of bringing in rookies, right?

Ricochet

Quote from: jamfrank on June 05, 2013, 04:37:14 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on June 05, 2013, 04:33:43 PM
Still don't think its a good decision to bring Mitchell in early

+1. The golden rule of bringing in rookies, right?
Especially when Sydney have been so reluctant to play the kid.

glynman

Personally I'm bringing in Hrovat over Mitchell. I don't have any mids out this week (except Moloney who I'm trading to Swallow) so I can afford to hold him on the bench. It'd be pointless getting Mitchell for me because he wouldn't be on field anyway. Plus I have concerns about Mitchell's JS but I'll still probably get him after his bye if named.

Justin Bieber

Well if Mitchell is sub then he's not in my best 18. If he plays full game, I'll bank on that 80-100, thank you very much.

Alka

Quote from: Ricochet on June 05, 2013, 04:33:43 PM
Still don't think its a good decision to bring Mitchell in early

I hate to break one of the golden rules, but what's the alternative?
I need a downgrade, so it's him or Hrovat who isn't playing so wouldn't add any to my score.

In bye carnage rules are meant to be broken.

stew42

...Hutchings is your answer if you don't have him already...

henry

Not fully convinced yet but at the moment am getting in mitchell this week for moloney, then next week maybe do lonergan to martin/hrovat and then evans to barlow.  Actually maybe just keep moloney this week and get him for the other of hrovat/martin next week and then get mitchell after his bye (for jaegar bomb maybe) would be safer. Reckon I'll do that  :P

Pokerface

Quote from: stew42 on June 05, 2013, 10:19:47 PM
...Hutchings is your answer if you don't have him already...

Hutchings JS is no better than Mitchells.

stew42

Quote from: Pokerface on June 06, 2013, 12:28:16 AM
Quote from: stew42 on June 05, 2013, 10:19:47 PM
...Hutchings is your answer if you don't have him already...

Hutchings JS is no better than Mitchells.
You'd think Mitchell's was pretty good. He was involved in more scores than any other Sydney player, he knows the game plan, and plays it gaddamn well. If Hutchings' JS is no better than Mitchell's, I'd be a happy chappy :)

Mr.Craig

Major Outs (And Still Outs) For Round 11

Blicavs - 33%
Rowe - 28.7%
Viney - 25.2%
Dwyer - 24.6%
LeCras - 12.6%
Lee - 11.8%
O'hAilpin - 9.7%
Jetta - 7.2%
Brown - 6%
Gorringe - 6%
Taylor - 5.9%
Menzel - 5.2%
Waters - 4.5%
Bellchambers - 3.8%

Justin Bieber

Quote from: Ricochet on June 05, 2013, 04:33:43 PM
Still don't think its a good decision to bring Mitchell in early

You were saying Ric?

pommyadam

Quote from: whatlez on June 05, 2013, 05:47:58 PM
Well if Mitchell is sub then he's not in my best 18. If he plays full game, I'll bank on that 80-100, thank you very much.

you can take the 80-100, i'll take his actual score thanks :D

m_zulian

Quote from: pommyadam on June 08, 2013, 07:41:15 PM
Quote from: whatlez on June 05, 2013, 05:47:58 PM
Well if Mitchell is sub then he's not in my best 18. If he plays full game, I'll bank on that 80-100, thank you very much.

you can take the 80-100, i'll take his actual score thanks :D

+1

Justin Bieber

Quote from: pommyadam on June 08, 2013, 07:41:15 PM
Quote from: whatlez on June 05, 2013, 05:47:58 PM
Well if Mitchell is sub then he's not in my best 18. If he plays full game, I'll bank on that 80-100, thank you very much.

you can take the 80-100, i'll take his actual score thanks :D

Once I saw Brandon Jack was named I knew he would be the sub. That kid is small haha

Ricochet

Quote from: whatlez on June 08, 2013, 07:38:05 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on June 05, 2013, 04:33:43 PM
Still don't think its a good decision to bring Mitchell in early

You were saying Ric?
haha yeh yeh, i was thinking more towards the first game back from their bye and if he isn't named