Cox or Stevey J

Started by GraysFan, February 01, 2013, 05:16:49 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

GraysFan

who would you choose out of cox and stevey j??

Jukes

Stevie J well over Cox (and buddy, for that matter).

SJ will average 102-105, while Cox and Buddy down at like 97. Choice is too easy.

Chelskiman


Windigo

Stevie J for those monster scores.  8)

StanTON#5


mezzoculo

Jonno - because he's amazingly underpriced (remembering his 1 in Rnd 18)!

Presto

Quote from: Jukes on February 01, 2013, 05:20:05 PM
Stevie J well over Cox (and buddy, for that matter).

SJ will average 102-105, while Cox and Buddy down at like 97. Choice is too easy.
Good joke, next you will tell us that GAJ and Swan won't score more than 80.
Anyway I have both and will keep both

Jukes

Quote from: Presto on February 01, 2013, 08:19:25 PM
Quote from: Jukes on February 01, 2013, 05:20:05 PM
Stevie J well over Cox (and buddy, for that matter).

SJ will average 102-105, while Cox and Buddy down at like 97. Choice is too easy.
Good joke, next you will tell us that GAJ and Swan won't score more than 80.
Anyway I have both and will keep both

Buddy averaged 93 last season without 204 in 2012. Unless he can kick like 4 bags of ten this year he won't beat SJ.

Cox is old and being replaced by Naitanui, Lycett and Sinclair's development. Won't average 100.

nrich102

I'll stick to the flow - Stevie J

Andrew

Round 3: Geelong plays Carlton where Gibbs kept SJ to 60... will it happen again?

Cox's dual position is too valuable this year and with Nic Nat being eased back into it could go BANG early. Cox for me, just, with SJ and Franklin my first upgrade targets no doubt.

Jukes

Quote from: Andrew on February 01, 2013, 10:09:14 PM
Round 3: Geelong plays Carlton where Gibbs kept SJ to 60... will it happen again?

Cox's dual position is too valuable this year and with Nic Nat being eased back into it could go BANG early. Cox for me, just, with SJ and Franklin my first upgrade targets no doubt.

"Cox's dual position is too valuable this year"



You will never use the ruck/forward DPP link at all in 2013 unless Leuey/best ruck gets injured, and even then you would probably just trade the injured player out or swap Cox with the injured player and trade them for a premo forward (doesn't need DPP link for that). Not needed at all.

Kellogscrunchynut

Stevie J by far it would be nothing short of miraculous if Cox doesn't go down in average.

timmyparso

Quote from: Jukes on February 01, 2013, 08:30:03 PM
Quote from: Presto on February 01, 2013, 08:19:25 PM
Quote from: Jukes on February 01, 2013, 05:20:05 PM
Stevie J well over Cox (and buddy, for that matter).

SJ will average 102-105, while Cox and Buddy down at like 97. Choice is too easy.
Good joke, next you will tell us that GAJ and Swan won't score more than 80.
Anyway I have both and will keep both

Buddy averaged 93 last season without 204 in 2012. Unless he can kick like 4 bags of ten this year he won't beat SJ.

Cox is old and being replaced by Naitanui, Lycett and Sinclair's development. Won't average 100.

If you''re going to manipulate buddy's score then at least remove his 2 red vest injury games to even the playing field before using it for argument. To remove the 204 is bullshowere anyway. He did score it and is more than capable of doing it again. You wouldn't remove your no. 1 lock player Stanton's score of 193!!!!!!

Jukes

Quote from: timmyparso on February 01, 2013, 11:17:50 PM
Quote from: Jukes on February 01, 2013, 08:30:03 PM
Quote from: Presto on February 01, 2013, 08:19:25 PM
Quote from: Jukes on February 01, 2013, 05:20:05 PM
Stevie J well over Cox (and buddy, for that matter).

SJ will average 102-105, while Cox and Buddy down at like 97. Choice is too easy.
Good joke, next you will tell us that GAJ and Swan won't score more than 80.
Anyway I have both and will keep both

Buddy averaged 93 last season without 204 in 2012. Unless he can kick like 4 bags of ten this year he won't beat SJ.

Cox is old and being replaced by Naitanui, Lycett and Sinclair's development. Won't average 100.

If you''re going to manipulate buddy's score then at least remove his 2 red vest injury games to even the playing field before using it for argument. To remove the 204 is bullshowere anyway. He did score it and is more than capable of doing it again. You wouldn't remove your no. 1 lock player Stanton's score of 193!!!!!!

Stants' best score, the 193, is only 18 points above his second best score, 175, and only only 38 off his third best score, 155-odd.

Buddy's best score, the 204, is 74 above his second best score 130, and 76 above his third best score, 128.

Without those two red vested games, both of which he played most of the game mind you, and his 204, his average is still only 97, which he should average in 2013.

essendon2

Cox for first 5 rounds... then Stevie Jay from 6 onwards