It's logical?

[kilbluff1985]

Hey guys so my preferred structer is 3 premo defenders, 5 premo mids, Rucks Luey+John Doe, Forward 4 premos +Varcoe/Knights at least if not 5 premos

here's my logic

last year we needed 7 starting defenders most people started 4 premos this year we only need 6 starters so i think it's worth starting 3 premo defenders 4 at the very most i'm sick of seeing teams in my thread with 5 premiums it's logical right?

Mids, again last year we needed 6 starters most started 4 premos now we need 8 starters so i think 5 premos is a must i know we have good rookie options but still need to get points on the board i'm sick of seeing teams with only 4 premo mids what are people thinking? it's logical right?

Rucks, meh!

Forwards, i should be using the same logic as i did for defenders but because there are **** all rookie choices 5 non rookies is a must have 

i prob didn't need to make a thread about this but do people agree with me?

[masedog333]

whos john doe

[kilbluff1985]

whos john doe

lol who they call unidentified people do you not watch movies or tv shows?

[upthemaidens]

whos john doe

A young ruckman for the swans, tall lanky dude with dreadlocks

[upthemaidens]

Hey guys so my preferred structer is 3 premo defenders, 5 premo mids, Rucks Luey+John Doe, Forward 4 premos +Varcoe/Knights at least if not 5 premos

here's my logic

last year we needed 7 starting defenders most people started 4 premos this year we only need 6 starters so i think it's worth starting 3 premo defenders 4 at the very most i'm sick of seeing teams in my thread with 5 premiums it's logical right?

Mids, again last year we needed 6 starters most started 4 premos now we need 8 starters so i think 5 premos is a must i know we have good rookie options but still need to get points on the board i'm sick of seeing teams with only 4 premo mids what are people thinking? it's logical right?

Rucks, meh!

Forwards, i should be using the same logic as i did for defenders but because there are **** all rookie choices 5 non rookies is a must have 

i prob didn't need to make a thread about this but do people agree with me?

Yep seems logical enough.
  I guess its depends how one goes about picking their team.  Do they pick the best rookies first and work that way, or pick the best premiums and work that way.

[masedog333]

whos john doe

lol who they call unidentified people do you not watch movies or tv shows?

whats a movie or a tv show

[Freddy]

whos john doe

A young ruckman for the swans, tall lanky dude with dreadlocks

I see no John Doe on the Swans list. Or any Doe on any teams list for that matter, unless you have misspelled his name????

[masedog333]

whos john doe

A young ruckman for the swans, tall lanky dude with dreadlocks

I see no John Doe on the Swans list. Or any Doe on any teams list for that matter, unless you have misspelled his name????

OMG i am laughing my head off you are all so funny omg omg omg im crying of laughter HAHAHAHAAHAHAH LOL

[Freddy]

whos john doe

A young ruckman for the swans, tall lanky dude with dreadlocks

I see no John Doe on the Swans list. Or any Doe on any teams list for that matter, unless you have misspelled his name????

OMG i am laughing my head off you are all so funny omg omg omg im crying of laughter HAHAHAHAAHAHAH LOL

Um why what is so funny?

[masedog333]

whos john doe

A young ruckman for the swans, tall lanky dude with dreadlocks

I see no John Doe on the Swans list. Or any Doe on any teams list for that matter, unless you have misspelled his name????

OMG i am laughing my head off you are all so funny omg omg omg im crying of laughter HAHAHAHAAHAHAH LOL

Um why what is so funny?

you are all taking the pi55 cos i said whos john doe

[nichsa673]

It's logical, but I think you have to consider the rookies more. Not so much which ones, but the depth in each lines this year. This year, ruck rookies are very weak, and defender and forward rookies aren't as strong as previous, so a case could be made to get more rookies in the midfield, with the likes of wines, lonergan, omeara, crouch, viney, mitchell, cachyia, mitchell, and then get more premos in the other line.

Just another way to look at it.

[GM]

This is my strategy KB.
Very Logical.

[kilbluff1985]

It's logical, but I think you have to consider the rookies more. Not so much which ones, but the depth in each lines this year. This year, ruck rookies are very weak, and defender and forward rookies aren't as strong as previous, so a case could be made to get more rookies in the midfield, with the likes of wines, lonergan, omeara, crouch, viney, mitchell, cachyia, mitchell, and then get more premos in the other line.

Just another way to look at it.

actually there are like 10 defender rookies that could get named round 1

[nichsa673]

It's logical, but I think you have to consider the rookies more. Not so much which ones, but the depth in each lines this year. This year, ruck rookies are very weak, and defender and forward rookies aren't as strong as previous, so a case could be made to get more rookies in the midfield, with the likes of wines, lonergan, omeara, crouch, viney, mitchell, cachyia, mitchell, and then get more premos in the other line.

Just another way to look at it.

actually there are like 10 defender rookies that could get named round 1

And about 8 would be out round 2

[kilbluff1985]

It's logical, but I think you have to consider the rookies more. Not so much which ones, but the depth in each lines this year. This year, ruck rookies are very weak, and defender and forward rookies aren't as strong as previous, so a case could be made to get more rookies in the midfield, with the likes of wines, lonergan, omeara, crouch, viney, mitchell, cachyia, mitchell, and then get more premos in the other line.

Just another way to look at it.

actually there are like 10 defender rookies that could get named round 1

And about 8 would be out round 2

could say that about mid rookies also even more so