T Dogs latest version

Started by T Dog, January 29, 2013, 01:06:51 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

T Dog

Any thoughts guys? Have made a few adjustments based on suggestions for last version..

TEAM NAME: T Dog
DEF: B. Goddard, P. Hanley, H. Shaw, B. Staker, J. Pittard, S. Docherty (C. Richardson, D. Terlich)
MID: D. Swan, G. Ablett jnr, S. Pendlebury, P. Dangerfield, L. Ball, A. Embley, O. Wines, B. Crouch (J. O'Meara, S. Dwyer)
RUC: T. Bellchambers, M. Leuenberger (M. Daw, S. Rowe)
FWD: L. Franklin, D. Cox, T. Rockliff, M. Robinson, T. Cloke, C. Knights (T. Lee, B. Kennedy)
CASH LEFT: $3,300

Windigo

Bryce Gibbs down back....?  ???

GM

I like the strategy of 3 premo def.
Perhaps as Windi suggests cement the best defenders & Gibbs will be in the top 2.
I like Hanley as d3,will be a good pod.

T Dog

Yeah a dilemna as I just don't rate him as I probably should Windigo. Shaw and Goddard are locks, and I figure Hanley has an upside. Am actually keen a starting a 3 premo defense structure this year and loading up on a few mid pricers. Will watch Hanley as he will be the one turning into Gibbs when pre season form starts to show itself.

Windigo

Gibbs averaged a respectable 91 a game which puts him in the top 4 among the backline. 1st on overall points.

Above Waters, Birchall ect.

With the potential to average over 100+ he surely must be a  lock?  :o

3 premium defenders is the way to go IMO, so why not get the best two and then go for a POD with the third.

T Dog

Quote from: Windigo on January 29, 2013, 01:18:31 PM
Gibbs averaged a respectable 91 a game which puts him in the top 4 among the backline. 1st on overall points.

Above Waters, Birchall ect.

With the potential to average over 100+ he surely must be a  lock?  :o

3 premium defenders is the way to go IMO, so why not get the best two and then go for a POD with the third.

On to it...another tweak or 2... 8)

GM

Quote from: Windigo on January 29, 2013, 01:18:31 PM
Gibbs averaged a respectable 91 a game which puts him in the top 4 among the backline. 1st on overall points.

Above Waters, Birchall ect.

With the potential to average over 100+ he surely must be a  lock?  :o

3 premium defenders is the way to go IMO, so why not get the best two and then go for a POD with the third.
Yeah,Malthouse has said Gibbsy will play midfield and this lad is a gun so imo his ave will increase to 100+.

T Dog

A slight tweak or 2 ,
Gibbs in - Hanley out.
McCaffer in - C.Knights out
and bench changes of B.Goodes and T. Menzel in - B Kennedy and Dwyer out.


TEAM NAME: T Dog
DEF: B. Goddard, B. Gibbs, H. Shaw, B. Staker, J. Pittard, S. Docherty (C. Richardson, D. Terlich)
MID: D. Swan, G. Ablett jnr, S. Pendlebury, P. Dangerfield, L. Ball, A. Embley, O. Wines, B. Crouch (J. O'Meara, B. Goodes)
RUC: T. Bellchambers, M. Leuenberger (M. Daw, S. Rowe)
FWD: L. Franklin, D. Cox, T. Rockliff, M. Robinson, T. Cloke, B. Macaffer (T. Lee, T. Menzel)
CASH LEFT: $9,200

Jukes

Quote from: T Dog on January 29, 2013, 03:19:56 PM
A slight tweak or 2 ,
Gibbs in - Hanley out.
McCaffer in - C.Knights out
and bench changes of B.Goodes and T. Menzel in - B Kennedy and Dwyer out.


TEAM NAME: T Dog
DEF: B. Goddard, B. Gibbs, H. Shaw, B. Staker, J. Pittard, S. Docherty (C. Richardson, D. Terlich)
MID: D. Swan, G. Ablett jnr, S. Pendlebury, P. Dangerfield, L. Ball, A. Embley, O. Wines, B. Crouch (J. O'Meara, B. Goodes)
RUC: T. Bellchambers, M. Leuenberger (M. Daw, S. Rowe)
FWD: L. Franklin, D. Cox, T. Rockliff, M. Robinson, T. Cloke, B. Macaffer (T. Lee, T. Menzel)
CASH LEFT: $9,200

Likes
CLOKEYYY great pick
Bellchambers, good roughie I reckon he's in for a great year
Shaw, could be a good POD if he returns to his 2011 form
Strong midfield

Dislikes: Being a SwAblett sheep :P (not that serious)
Buddy: won't average 100, SJ will. 102-105 > 96-99. The choice is easy.

Suggested Alterations
Buddy -> Stevie J
Macaffer -> Mayes, can't see Macaffer playing 5 games, reckon Mayes will play 15+. Worth it for just 20k more.

Ratings
Backs: 7.75/10
Mids: 9.25/10
Rucks: 8/10
Forwards: 8.5/10
Overall: 8.4/10 a strong side

T Dog


kilbluff1985

not enough mid rookies for me