Jack Grimes v Dyson Heppell

[erich1036]

Which one would you take and why? Vote in the poll! No doubt this is one troubling most SuperCoachers.

[thewizz]

Heppel - doesn't get injured if someone sneezes in his general direction.

[mudgee]

Heppel - doesn't get injured if someone sneezes in his general direction.

+1 LOL!
Plus more midfield time in 2013 :)

[Adamant]

Grimesy for me.

He finished the season on fire, and he should continue that into 2013. Heppell could do anything with another pre-season under his belt though.

[ronl]

I've got them both, great one-two punch. Goddard and Heppel should combine really well for the bombers.

[nrich102]

I think Grimes

[shorty3264]

I've got them both, great one-two punch. Goddard and Heppel should combine really well for the bombers.

Yep, also got them both, both should score around the 95-105 mark.

[My Chumps]

Grimes.
Averaged 107 over his last 7 games in 2012, and playing in the midfield for (surely) an improving Melbourne team he should keep that up.

[Presto]

Grimes by far.
He proved last year what he can do once he is over his injuries, and finished the year with a bang scoring over 100 in 5 of his last 7 games.
Heppell, imho had a disappointing year, marking time from the previous year. Also (again imho) he is more suited for DT than SC.

[Jroo]

Grimes for me, he's proven and should get more midfield time. The Dee's also have an easy draw.
Heppell would still be a good chcoie, but it think there are a few other defenders like Grimes, I would rather than him. Will the inclusion of Goddard affect him at all?

[theta]

Grimes.
Averaged 107 over his last 7 games in 2012, and playing in the midfield for (surely) an improving Melbourne team he should keep that up.

3 of those scores were 138, 110 and 115, against Port, GC and GWS.

[Presto]

Grimes.
Averaged 107 over his last 7 games in 2012, and playing in the midfield for (surely) an improving Melbourne team he should keep that up.

3 of those scores were 138, 110 and 115, against Port, GC and GWS.

Which are still by far better than Heppel scores against Port(99,94,86), GC(84 and 84). Has not played yet against GWS.

[tbagrocks]

I see big upside in both, Grimes was great for my SC once picking him up after the byes, Hep surely will improve? He has to, I am tempted to start both as after the top two I am struggling on my next backs

If one then go Grimes to continue on what he has started

[coolfugitiv0]

Grimes.
Averaged 107 over his last 7 games in 2012, and playing in the midfield for (surely) an improving Melbourne team he should keep that up.

3 of those scores were 138, 110 and 115, against Port, GC and GWS.

Which are still by far better than Heppel scores against Port(99,94,86), GC(84 and 84). Has not played yet against GWS.

To be fair, how much of the ball was in the Bombers back half during those games?

[quinny88]

Think they will both avg around 90-95. I dont think ill be going with either though