Ablett, Swan, Pendlebury

[masedog333]

Vote your number please and if you could, comment who. At the moment I'm torn, I want them all but they all have the same bye and they're so expensive!

[Adamant]

I've locked in all three. Gotta start with the best of the best.

[Obese Arachnid]

I've locked in all three. Gotta start with the best of the best.

+1

[kilbluff1985]

just Ablett+Pendles i think

[youl_R_FCK]

wouldn't think there would many people expecting to make top 1000 in DT by picking up swan. supercoach different story

[Ricochet]

wouldn't think there would many people expecting to make top 1000 in DT by picking up swan. supercoach different story

say what? ???

[kilbluff1985]

wouldn't think there would many people expecting to make top 1000 in DT by picking up swan. supercoach different story

say what? ???

lol think he means Swan is not as important in supercoach compared to dreamteam and i agree

[Ricochet]

wouldn't think there would many people expecting to make top 1000 in DT by picking up swan. supercoach different story

say what? ???

lol think he means Swan is not as important in supercoach compared to dreamteam and i agree

ahhh ok

[nostradamus]

wouldn't think there would many people expecting to make top 1000 in DT by picking up swan. supercoach different story

say what? ???

lol think he means Swan is not as important in supercoach compared to dreamteam and i agree

ahhh ok

he's important in both.....l've got all 3 locked in for DT and SC

[SydneyRox]

yup. all 3 locked.

[mpollock]

Will probably start 2 but possibly three.

I think Ablett is a must and at least one of Pendles or Swan.  At the moment i am going with Pendles as he is a little cheaper, more consistent and resilient.

[nrich102]

I'll definently start wuth GAJ, yet not sure on Pendlebury and Swan

[Presto]

Will probably start 2 but possibly three.

I think Ablett is a must and at least one of Pendles or Swan.  At the moment i am going with Pendles as he is a little cheaper, more consistent and resilient.

This must be the fourth post I have seen that claims that Pendles is either more consistent or more resilient, but last year statistics tell us it is not so. Apart from similar averages (Swan slightly better) they both missed 4 games, they both had 3 games under 100 (again Swan slightly better). Swan seems to have a higher ceiling (175-180), while Pendle has only (155-167)
That is why I plan to go with GAJ and Swan, but I am still in doubt about Pendles
The difference in price is minimal and in my opinion irrelevant.
If instead we are talking about DT, there is no doubts that Swan seems a much better option although the difference in price (120K) makes it a more difficult (or easier) choice.

[kilbluff1985]

Will probably start 2 but possibly three.

I think Ablett is a must and at least one of Pendles or Swan.  At the moment i am going with Pendles as he is a little cheaper, more consistent and resilient.

This must be the fourth post I have seen that claims that Pendles is either more consistent or more resilient, but last year statistics tell us it is not so. Apart from similar averages (Swan slightly better) they both missed 4 games, they both had 3 games under 100 (again Swan slightly better). Swan seems to have a higher ceiling (175-180), while Pendle has only (155-167)
That is why I plan to go with GAJ and Swan, but I am still in doubt about Pendles
The difference in price is minimal and in my opinion irrelevant.
If instead we are talking about DT, there is no doubts that Swan seems a much better option although the difference in price (120K) makes it a more difficult (or easier) choice.

Pendles had a down year was playing with back problems etc so cant go much by last year

[MLS]

Pendles does it with class and poise, Swan does it with shear weight of possessions.

Each to their own, but Pendles and GAJ for me.