Wright, Martin or De Boer

[melon101]

I know its early so I would appreciate if people dont comment about how this is useless or there's no point asking becuase I would just like to know who people would pick :)

[Jukes]

Matty Wright will average the most for sure, he'll go 94-98 while can't see Martin and de Boer going much higher than 92.

[Ricochet]

Has to be Dusty of those three mate.
Both Wright and De Boer have too many others ahead of them in their midfields

[Adamant]

In order - Dusty, Wright, de Boer.

Dusty had a horror season, and de Boer had a career best... both averaged the same. I know who I'd rather.

I'm personally not really a fan of Matty Wright, and not too sure why. I can see why a lot of people like him, but I just don't see him averaging 95+ tbh.

Another interesting stat - Dusty averaged 48 up until halftime, and 36 in his second half. With another pre-season under his belt, he should run out games better and average 90-95+.

[Jukes]

And as Rico and Ads have proven, Wrighty is a unique option :P

[Ricochet]

Haha not saying he's a bad option. Just can't see him improving too much more unless he gets more time in the midfield.

[melon101]

Cheers lads, thanks for the help

[owenbond007]

wright martin have massive upside potentially but clearly you put de boer in there to be a complete tool wtf unless i completely missed something

[Justin Bieber]

It's not sure what's the weight choice ;)

But I would go Dusty.

[Ricochet]

wright martin have massive upside potentially but clearly you put de boer in there to be a complete tool wtf unless i completely missed something

de Boer averaged the same as both Dusty and Wright

[essendon2]

wright martin have massive upside potentially but clearly you put de boer in there to be a complete tool wtf unless i completely missed something

de Boer averaged the same as both Dusty and Wright

+1
scored more tons than dusty did as well

[owenbond007]

considering hes been around for a long time and only had 5 tons high varied from 147 to a low of 39 and the fact he is one of lyons boys how the fffffff would he be on ya radar. Actually after further analysis i retract from my statement i thought he had been around for a long time(i thought he was a lot older) but clearly could have value at his price and age. I apologize and thankyou for bringing de boer to my attention.

[tbagrocks]

From what I understand is Matt and Matt both playing forward have now started getting more midfield time, I expect both De Boer and Wright to continue to get more time there, especially Wrigt, only played two seasons for 36 games and is pretty much the fourth wheel now

I believe their lower scores were from playing more forward, but as said I think both will have more midfield run

[nrich102]

De Boer is better in Super Coach, Get Martin.

[Toga]

As Ada said, it's Dusty > Wright > de Boer for me as well.

Dusty had a horror year, but with Richmonds new recruits in Knights & Edwards I think he'll play higher up the ground this year, probably in the midfield a bit more. And by all reports he's flying at training 8)

Wright, don't know much about him asides from the fact it'll be his 3rd year in the system, perfect for a breakout, and is in line for more midfield time this year.

De Boer, as Ada said, had a career best year, so I expect the others to improve beyond his potential, putting him down the order for me.

That being said, Dusty is locked in my team, while Wright is also there at the moment, but will be fighting it out with others like tex for that spot in my team.