New Structure, New Team, New Ideas

Started by essendon2, January 14, 2013, 01:25:41 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

essendon2

Brendon Goddard, Jack Grimes, Bryce Gibbs, Greg Broughton, Jasper Pittard, Brett Goodes
(Sam Docherty, Dean Terlich)

Dane Swan, Gary Ablett Jnr, Jack Redden, Kieran Jack, Andrew Embley, Jesse Lonergan, Kane Mitchell, Jaeger O'Meara
(Matt Jones, Jack Viney)

Ben McEvoy, Matthew Leuenberger
(Jarred Witts, Craig Moller)

Tom Rockliff, Mitch Robinson, Nick Riewoldt, Matthew Wright, Colin Sylvia, Chris Knights
(Brent Staker (DPP), Tom Lee)


Currently have Jack, NRoo and McEvoy purely because of their domination against the weaker teams that they face in the first 3 rounds of season 2013! Will be nice stepping stones to hopefully fallen premiums such as Cotchin and Franklin

Also, I am starting Embley + Knights over Wines + 400-450k FWD & I'm starting Jack + McEvoy over Pendles + Goldstein (mentioned above)


Not really too sure on the D4 and M4 positions at the moment, large list of players that could potentially take that spot:

DEF:
Paul Duffield
Hamish Hartlett
Pearce Hanley
Greg Broughton*
Dyson Heppell

FWD:
Travis Cloke
Shaun Higgins
Dustin Martin
Matthew Wright*
Matthew De Boer
Greg Broughton

* = In the team at the moment

mb21

I dont think Knights will do anything. His body has had it. At best he will play 2 of every 3 games. Will be rested too often for my likinh. I don't mind the rest, but I think you need Buddy.

What do you think of this team?


Rosston Celtics Fanplanner squad in the Dream Team competition coached by mb21. Salary cap left: $38,500.

Brendon Goddard, Bryce Gibbs, Greg Broughton, Brian Lake, Jack Watts, Sam Docherty
Sam Colquhoun, Dean Terlich

Dane Swan, Gary Ablett jnr, Nathan Fyfe, Andrew Embley, Oliver Wines, Brett Goodes, Brad Crouch, Tom Mitchell
Jaeger O'Meara, Jack Viney

Aaron Sandilands, Hamish McIntosh
Setanta O'hAilpin, Max Gawn

Lance Franklin, Tom Rockliff, Dale Thomas, Mitch Robinson, Stefan Martin, Jake Stringer
Brent Staker, Tom Lee

Windigo

   44   90   100   70   102   134   101   141   84   68   88   100   

Knights' SANFL scores. Not past it I wouldn't think.

tbagrocks

Quote from: Windigo on January 14, 2013, 11:58:17 PM
   44   90   100   70   102   134   101   141   84   68   88   100   

Knights' SANFL scores. Not past it I wouldn't think.
Those scores are while still under an injury cloud

When fit he does far more damage in the SANFL, also he should be inspired about joining a Melbourbe team just like Maric, I hope people leave him out, as the Richmond faithful have said (their club must be pretty bad) Knights is a walk up start

mb21

Well pick him if you want. It's an AFL player playing SANFL. Do you know who else scores half decently in the SANFL? Any shower AFL player. If Knights couldn't make Adelaide's showerty team then what chance does he have to be a regular at another AFL team? He is old, past it, and will pinch hit if he does get games. Please pick him.

Ziplock

symes won the sandover and no club would touch him with a 10 ft pole.

tbagrocks

You are both wrong here :P

Brad Symes won the Magarey medal

Chris Knights will get a second wind and there was better depth at Adelaide than Richmond

::)

Windigo

I see you got rid of Hamish.

I didn't mid that selction as a fit H-Mac is better scoring wise than a lot of other rucks. I've gone with him, see how he goes first 3 rounds...If he plays.  :P

Grazz

Team looks ok mate, your well into the process of getting your head around the advantages to be taken via the new rules.  :)

essendon2

Quote from: Windigo on January 15, 2013, 11:59:38 AM
I see you got rid of Hamish.

I didn't mid that selction as a fit H-Mac is better scoring wise than a lot of other rucks. I've gone with him, see how he goes first 3 rounds...If he plays.  :P
as in Hartlett?


Quote from: Grazz on January 15, 2013, 01:07:22 PM
Team looks ok mate, your well into the process of getting your head around the advantages to be taken via the new rules.  :)
just ok? haha  ???


Grazz


Quote from: Grazz on January 15, 2013, 01:07:22 PM
Team looks ok mate, your well into the process of getting your head around the advantages to be taken via the new rules.  :)
just ok? haha  ???
[/quote]

Haha, yeh true its better than ok certainly.

Adamant

Quote from: essendon2 on January 15, 2013, 01:51:23 PM
Quote from: Windigo on January 15, 2013, 11:59:38 AM
I see you got rid of Hamish.

I didn't mid that selction as a fit H-Mac is better scoring wise than a lot of other rucks. I've gone with him, see how he goes first 3 rounds...If he plays.  :P
as in Hartlett?

He said H-Mac, so Hamish McInstosh, ;)

Windigo

Quote from: essendon2 on January 15, 2013, 01:51:23 PM
Quote from: Windigo on January 15, 2013, 11:59:38 AM
I see you got rid of Hamish.

I didn't mid that selction as a fit H-Mac is better scoring wise than a lot of other rucks. I've gone with him, see how he goes first 3 rounds...If he plays.  :P
as in Hartlett?


Quote from: Grazz on January 15, 2013, 01:07:22 PM
Team looks ok mate, your well into the process of getting your head around the advantages to be taken via the new rules.  :)
just ok? haha  ???



As in McIntosh.

essendon2

Quote from: Windigo on January 15, 2013, 02:28:09 PM
Quote from: essendon2 on January 15, 2013, 01:51:23 PM
Quote from: Windigo on January 15, 2013, 11:59:38 AM
I see you got rid of Hamish.

I didn't mid that selction as a fit H-Mac is better scoring wise than a lot of other rucks. I've gone with him, see how he goes first 3 rounds...If he plays.  :P
as in Hartlett?


Quote from: Grazz on January 15, 2013, 01:07:22 PM
Team looks ok mate, your well into the process of getting your head around the advantages to be taken via the new rules.  :)
just ok? haha  ???



As in McIntosh.
but I never had H-Mac?  :o ???

Windigo

You sure.....

...Maybe I'm a tripping.  ::)