The Incredible Fantastic Thread Where All Combo Questions Will Be Answered!

Started by Adamant, January 08, 2013, 10:58:42 PM

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
Go Down Pages 1 ... 17 18 19 20 21 ... 65
User actions

Toga

#271
February 19, 2013, 08:34:24 PM
Heppell (D4) + Knights (F4)

or

Cox (F1) + Thurlow (D8)

or

Harbrow (D4) + Broughton (F4)

Jukes

#272
February 19, 2013, 08:50:10 PM
Quote from: Toga on February 19, 2013, 08:34:24 PM
Heppell (D4) + Knights (F4)

or

Cox (F1) + Thurlow (D8)

or

Harbrow (D4) + Broughton (F4)

Heppell 96 + Knights 75 = 171
Cox 97 + Thurlow 60 = 157
Harbrow 75 + Broughton 87 = 162

HeppD and Knights easily.

Toga

#273
February 19, 2013, 09:13:56 PM
On ya Jukesy :)

*Your pick in fantasy elite ;)

essendon2

#274
February 19, 2013, 09:56:07 PM Last Edit: February 19, 2013, 10:04:28 PM by essendon2
robbo + hartlett + mid rook + varcoe
vs
siposs + stanley + embley + varcoe
vs
robbo + stanley + mid rook + macaffer

Jukes

#275
February 19, 2013, 10:13:22 PM
Quote from: essendon2 on February 19, 2013, 09:56:07 PM
robbo + hartlett + mid rook + varcoe
vs
siposs + stanley + embley + varcoe
vs
robbo + stanley + mid rook + macaffer

Robbo 97, Hartlett 87, Mid rook 70, Varcoe 78 = 332
vs
Siposs 85, Stanley 94, Embers 88, Varcoe 78 = 345
vs
Robbo 97, Stanley 94, mid rook 70, Macaffer 75 = 336

= middle option.

Holz

#276
February 20, 2013, 01:44:29 PM
Cox + Varcoe + 50k

v

Goldy + Sylvia

Aaron26

#277
February 20, 2013, 05:19:01 PM
redden, n riewoldt
vs
fyfe, cox

Nails

#278
February 20, 2013, 05:20:08 PM
Rockliff + Byrnes

OR

Maccaffer and Staker?

Jukes

#279
February 20, 2013, 05:22:05 PM
Quote from: Holzman on February 20, 2013, 01:44:29 PM
Cox + Varcoe + 50k
v
Goldy + Sylvia
Cox 96, Varcoe 78, 50k 9.7 (cash divided by magic number) = 183.7
Goldy 94, Sylvia 87 = 181

I'd go Cox/Varcoe/Money if you can utilise the cash effectively. If the cash doesn't really matter, I'd go Goldy and Sylvia.

Quote from: Aaron26 on February 20, 2013, 05:19:01 PM
redden, n riewoldt
vs
fyfe, cox

Redden 107, Voldt 95
vs
Fyfe 102, Cox 96
= 202 vs 198
I'd go Redden and Nicky Voldt.

essendon2

#280
February 20, 2013, 08:21:26 PM
Hartlett + Gaff + Robbo + Macaffer

vs

Stanley + Embley + Martin + Siposs

Ricochet

#281
February 20, 2013, 08:43:23 PM
Quote from: essendon2 on February 20, 2013, 08:21:26 PM
Hartlett + Gaff + Robbo + Macaffer

vs

Stanley + Embley + Martin + Siposs
Stanley > Harlett
Embley > Gaff (just)
Martin < Robbo
Siposs = Macaffer

Option 2 for me mate

essendon2

#282
February 20, 2013, 08:45:44 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on February 20, 2013, 08:43:23 PM
Quote from: essendon2 on February 20, 2013, 08:21:26 PM
Hartlett + Gaff + Robbo + Macaffer

vs

Stanley + Embley + Martin + Siposs
Stanley > Harlett
Embley > Gaff (just)
Martin < Robbo
Siposs = Macaffer

Option 2 for me mate
Can't see Embley averaging more than 90... whereas I see Gaff averaging 100-105

Windigo

#283
February 20, 2013, 08:49:21 PM
105 is big ask from Gaff TBH. That is a Tuck like year.

Maybe near the 100 mark or below. 

Ricochet

#284
February 20, 2013, 08:50:40 PM
Quote from: essendon2 on February 20, 2013, 08:45:44 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on February 20, 2013, 08:43:23 PM
Quote from: essendon2 on February 20, 2013, 08:21:26 PM
Hartlett + Gaff + Robbo + Macaffer

vs

Stanley + Embley + Martin + Siposs
Stanley > Harlett
Embley > Gaff (just)
Martin < Robbo
Siposs = Macaffer

Option 2 for me mate
Can't see Embley averaging more than 90... whereas I see Gaff averaging 100-105
wow really? thats big breakout. I see Embley as a safe 92-95 and Gaff improving to 90-92
Print
Go Up Pages 1 ... 17 18 19 20 21 ... 65
User actions