The Incredible Fantastic Thread Where All Combo Questions Will Be Answered!

Started by Adamant, January 08, 2013, 10:58:42 PM

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
Go Down Pages 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 ... 65
User actions

essendon2

#240
February 17, 2013, 08:00:04 PM
Cotchin + Hartlett + Siposs + J. Lonergan
vs
Redden + Def rook + Martin + Embley

The It

#241
February 17, 2013, 08:11:58 PM
Fyfe + Heppell/Grimes
or
Murphy + Broughton

Adamant

#242
February 17, 2013, 08:13:14 PM
Quote from: essendon2 on February 17, 2013, 08:00:04 PM
Cotchin + Hartlett + Siposs + J. Lonergan
vs
Redden + Def rook + Martin + Embley

Cotchin (112) + Hartlett (88) + Siposs (80) + Lonergan (70)
vs
Redden (107) + Def rook (60?) + Martin (92) + Embley (87)

Technically - Option 1 just, but I prefer the look of option 2 actually.

Jukes

#243
February 17, 2013, 08:22:11 PM
Quote from: essendon2 on February 17, 2013, 08:00:04 PM
Cotchin + Hartlett + Siposs + J. Lonergan
vs
Redden + Def rook + Martin + Embley

Cotchin 115, Hartlett 87, Siposs 85, Longergan 70
vs
Redden 106, Whoever 60, Martin 90, Embers 88
=357 vs 344
First option

Quote from: The It on February 17, 2013, 08:11:58 PM
Fyfe + Heppell/Grimes
or
Murphy + Broughton

Fyfe 104, Heppell 95
vs
Murphy 106, Broughton 86
=199 vs 192
First option

essendon2

#244
February 17, 2013, 09:23:08 PM
Martin + DEF rook

vs

Hartlett + Macaffer

Jukes

#245
February 17, 2013, 09:24:08 PM
Quote from: essendon2 on February 17, 2013, 09:23:08 PM
Martin + DEF rook

vs

Hartlett + Macaffer

Martin 92, back rook 65
vs
Hartlett 87, Macaffer 75

I reckon go the second option therefore.

Jukes

#246
February 17, 2013, 10:05:12 PM
Grimes and Kane Mitchell
vs
Terlich and Fyfe

Windigo

#247
February 17, 2013, 10:09:28 PM
Grimes & Kane.

I doubt Terlich will post dominant scores & Fyfe is caught between a gun and a stepping stone. Won't be a top 6-8 mid...

Grimes would be a keeper and Kane will hopefully be a great stepping stone to a premium.

Jukes

#248
February 17, 2013, 10:24:49 PM Last Edit: February 17, 2013, 10:36:22 PM by Jukes
cheers.

Just realised I can't afford it by like 10k. Damn.

Adamant

#249
February 17, 2013, 10:59:47 PM
Quote from: Jukes on February 17, 2013, 10:24:49 PM
cheers.

Just realised I can't afford it by like 10k. Damn.

lol go Birch over Grimes then. ;)

Jukes

#250
February 17, 2013, 11:01:52 PM
Quote from: Adamant on February 17, 2013, 10:59:47 PM
Quote from: Jukes on February 17, 2013, 10:24:49 PM
cheers.

Just realised I can't afford it by like 10k. Damn.

lol go Birch over Grimes then. ;)

Don't see Birch coming close to Grimes.

Adamant

#251
February 17, 2013, 11:48:47 PM
Quote from: Jukes on February 17, 2013, 11:01:52 PM
Quote from: Adamant on February 17, 2013, 10:59:47 PM
Quote from: Jukes on February 17, 2013, 10:24:49 PM
cheers.

Just realised I can't afford it by like 10k. Damn.

lol go Birch over Grimes then. ;)

Don't see Birch coming close to Grimes.

I knew you'd say something like that.

Birch - 90
Grimes - 94

Not that much difference.

essendon2

#252
February 18, 2013, 12:21:15 PM
hartlett + harbrow + siposs
vs
stanley + j.russell + siposs
vs
stanley + DEF rook + robinson

Jukes

#253
February 18, 2013, 12:28:45 PM
Quote from: essendon2 on February 18, 2013, 12:21:15 PM
hartlett + harbrow + siposs
vs
stanley + j.russell + siposs
vs
stanley + DEF rook + robinson

Hartlett 87, Harbrow 75, Siposs 85
Staley 94, Russell 72, Siposs 85
Stanley 94, rook 65, Robbo 93

=247 vs 251 vs 252
Last one, just make sure to pick a good back rook.

essendon2

#254
February 18, 2013, 12:34:00 PM
Cox + Johnson + Mayes + Jacobs + Goodes + Fyfe
vs
NRoo + Varcoe + Siposs + Sandilands + Stanley + Embley
Print
Go Up Pages 1 ... 15 16 17 18 19 ... 65
User actions