The Incredible Fantastic Thread Where All Combo Questions Will Be Answered!

[Jukes]

Okay so i have a few to run past you guys

Redden and Walker VS Boyd and Broughton

Goldy and Buddy VS Ryder and Robbo

Thanks Fellaz

Redden 106, Tex 93
vs
Boyd 113, Broughts 86
= 199 vs 199, I'd go Redden and Tex however as moar money will be gained.

Goldy 93, Buddy 97
vs
Ryder 93, Robbo 95

= 190 vs 188
Would go Goldy and Buddy therefore.

[tbagrocks]

Redden 110 and Tex 98

Boyd 115 and Broughton 88

[elephants]

Great work to everyone that's been helping out Ads (and great work Ads).

I have my first of many combo questions for yas all ;)



Ablett, Ball, Pederson, Lee

vs

Boyd, Wines, Martin, Siposs



Initially had the first one but tinkered with it and changed to the second one. Good change? Thanks boys ;)

[Adamant]

Great work to everyone that's been helping out Ads (and great work Ads).

I have my first of many combo questions for yas all ;)



Ablett, Ball, Pederson, Lee

vs

Boyd, Wines, Martin, Siposs



Initially had the first one but tinkered with it and changed to the second one. Good change? Thanks boys ;)

Ablett (122) + Ball (92) + Pederson (75) + Lee (55)

vs

Boyd (115) + Wines (82) + Martin (92) + Siposs (76 to be safe, but could go 85ish)

Option 2 wins on scoring potential and you gain more keepers.

[elephants]

Great work to everyone that's been helping out Ads (and great work Ads).

I have my first of many combo questions for yas all ;)



Ablett, Ball, Pederson, Lee

vs

Boyd, Wines, Martin, Siposs



Initially had the first one but tinkered with it and changed to the second one. Good change? Thanks boys ;)

Ablett (122) + Ball (92) + Pederson (75) + Lee (55)

vs

Boyd (115) + Wines (82) + Martin (92) + Siposs (76 to be safe, but could go 85ish)

Option 2 wins on scoring potential and you gain more keepers.

Yep, by that count the second one kills it and like you said you're being conservative on Siposs.

Well, thats my DT tinker for the day! Thanks mate ;)

[essendon2]

Stanley + Heppell + Ablett + Mid rook + NRoo (first 5 rounds)

vs

Birchall + Atley + S. Selwood + Bennell + Sylvia

[Adamant]

Stanley + Heppell + Ablett + Mid rook + NRoo (first 5 rounds)

vs

Birchall + Atley + S. Selwood + Bennell + Sylvia

That's massive!

Stanley (94) + Heppell (90) + Ablett (122) + Mid Rook (65) + NRoo first 5 rounds (95) = 466
vs
Birchall (90) + Atley (73) + S.Selwood (105) + Bennell (91) + Sylvia (89) = 448

Option 1 easily.

[essendon2]

Boyd/Beams/Cotchin + Hartlett + Harbrow + J. Lonergan + Stevie Jay
vs

Ablett + DEF Rook + Heppell + Embley + Robinson

[Jukes]

Stanley + Heppell + Ablett + Mid rook + NRoo (first 5 rounds)

vs

Birchall + Atley + S. Selwood + Bennell + Sylvia

Stanley 93, Heppell 95, Ablett 114, Kane Mitchell (?) 65,  Voldt 95 (season)
vs
Birch 90, Atley 76, Scoot 100, Bennell 95, Col 92
=462 vs 453
I'd also go with the second option in terms of scoring ability, ceteris parabus

Boyd/Beams/Cotchin + Hartlett + Harbrow + J. Lonergan + Stevie Jay
vs

Ablett + DEF Rook + Heppell + Embley + Robinson

Beams 116, HH 88, Harbrow 75, Jesse 70, SJ 105
vs
Ablett 114, Goodes/Stevenson/Docherty 65, Heppell 95, Embers 88, Robbo 95
=454 vs 457
Would be going the second option therefore mate.

[elephants]

Thats cool Jukes :(

[Jukes]

Calm your tits

Ablett, Ball, Pederson, Lee

vs

Boyd, Wines, Martin, Siposs

Ablett 114, Ball 90, Pedo 75, Lee 60
vs
Boyd 115, Wines 83, Dusty 92, Siposs 85

=339 vs 375

Second option.

[elephants]

Calm your tits

[Andrew]

In the midfield: Kieran Jack & Brett Goodes OR Jarred McVeigh & Wines

Cheers.

[essendon2]

Heppell + Siposs
vs
Harbrow + Martin

[Jukes]

In the midfield: Kieran Jack & Brett Goodes OR Jarred McVeigh & Wines

Cheers.

Jack 102, Goodes 67
vs
McVeigh 90, Wines 83
=169 vs 173

Would go the second option, but surely there is a better option than McVeigh.

Heppell + Siposs
vs
Harbrow + Martin

Heppell 95, Siposs 85
vs
Harbrow 76, Martin 90
=180 vs 166

Easily the first option.