The Incredible Fantastic Thread Where All Combo Questions Will Be Answered!

Started by Adamant, January 08, 2013, 10:58:42 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Jukes


Windigo

Byrnes killed it in the VFL last year and with more opportunities, you'd think that 70+ for him is reasonable.  8)

stew42

Thanks lads. If Byrnes only just couldn't fit into the premiership winning Cats side, he'll be #1 player at the Dees :-)

Windigo

He'll play all/most games for sure being in the leadership group, but not the number 1 player at Melbourne.  :P

Holz

Sylvia + Sandi + Wines

v

J.Lweis/N.Roo + Goldy + Wines

v

S.J + Goldy + K.Mithcell

Ricochet

Quote from: Holzman on February 14, 2013, 02:53:15 PM
Sylvia + Sandi + Wines

v

J.Lweis/N.Roo + Goldy + Wines

v

S.J + Goldy + K.Mithcell
I would go with option 1 personally.
Sylvia should do back to his 90+ days.
SJ has a toughish start (last years scores) - Hawks (101,113) North (60) Carlton (60) Sydney (99)
I've changed my mind on Sandi, he should go 100+ and be just ahead of Goldy
and Wines = Mitchell

Holz

Quote from: Ricochet on February 14, 2013, 03:04:21 PM
Quote from: Holzman on February 14, 2013, 02:53:15 PM
Sylvia + Sandi + Wines

v

J.Lweis/N.Roo + Goldy + Wines

v

S.J + Goldy + K.Mithcell
I would go with option 1 personally.
Sylvia should do back to his 90+ days.
SJ has a toughish start (last years scores) - Hawks (101,113) North (60) Carlton (60) Sydney (99)
I've changed my mind on Sandi, he should go 100+ and be just ahead of Goldy
and Wines = Mitchell

based off that I should go Syvlia + Goldy + Mitchell and use the 100k elsewhere.

Ricochet

Quote from: Holzman on February 14, 2013, 03:13:31 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on February 14, 2013, 03:04:21 PM
Quote from: Holzman on February 14, 2013, 02:53:15 PM
Sylvia + Sandi + Wines

v

J.Lweis/N.Roo + Goldy + Wines

v

S.J + Goldy + K.Mithcell
I would go with option 1 personally.
Sylvia should do back to his 90+ days.
SJ has a toughish start (last years scores) - Hawks (101,113) North (60) Carlton (60) Sydney (99)
I've changed my mind on Sandi, he should go 100+ and be just ahead of Goldy
and Wines = Mitchell

based off that I should go Syvlia + Goldy + Mitchell and use the 100k elsewhere.
yep definitely. Wines ---> Embles maybe?

Jukes

Quote from: Holzman on February 14, 2013, 02:53:15 PM
Sylvia + Sandi + Wines

v

J.Lweis/N.Roo + Goldy + Wines

v

S.J + Goldy + K.Mithcell

Sylvia 93, Sandi 96, Wines 82
vs
Roo/Lewis 94, Goldy 90, Wines 82
vs
SJ 102, Goldy 90, Mitchell 70.

=271 vs 266 vs 262

The first option imo purely based on scoring potential.

Holz

Quote from: Ricochet on February 14, 2013, 03:21:08 PM
Quote from: Holzman on February 14, 2013, 03:13:31 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on February 14, 2013, 03:04:21 PM
Quote from: Holzman on February 14, 2013, 02:53:15 PM
Sylvia + Sandi + Wines

v

J.Lweis/N.Roo + Goldy + Wines

v

S.J + Goldy + K.Mithcell
I would go with option 1 personally.
Sylvia should do back to his 90+ days.
SJ has a toughish start (last years scores) - Hawks (101,113) North (60) Carlton (60) Sydney (99)
I've changed my mind on Sandi, he should go 100+ and be just ahead of Goldy
and Wines = Mitchell

based off that I should go Syvlia + Goldy + Mitchell and use the 100k elsewhere.
yep definitely. Wines ---> Embles maybe?

got embers and ball already.

Spanner221


Jukes


Adamant

Quote from: Spanner221 on February 14, 2013, 06:44:50 PM
Fyfe (m5) + Cox (R1)
vs
Cotchin + goldy

Fyfe (104) + Cox (99)
vs
Cotchin (112) + Goldy (86)

Fyfe and Cox for me.

Jalapeno

Okay so i have a few to run past you guys

Redden and Walker VS Boyd and Broughton

Goldy and Buddy VS Ryder and Robbo

Thanks Fellaz

Adamant

Quote from: Jalapeno on February 15, 2013, 12:10:11 AM
Okay so i have a few to run past you guys

Redden and Walker VS Boyd and Broughton

Goldy and Buddy VS Ryder and Robbo

Thanks Fellaz

Redden (107) + Walker (90)
VS
Boyd (114) + Broughton (88)

Boyd and Broughts.




Goldy (86) + Buddy (100)
VS
Ryder (91) + Robbo (101)

Ryder and Robbo.