The Incredible Fantastic Thread Where All Combo Questions Will Be Answered!

[Adamant]

Redden has proven that he is better after his bye, I'm not saying he won't do well pre-bye, I hope he does, so he can reward all the ballsy coaches that put him in! But since I'm starting with only 4 MID Guns (Swa, Ablett, Watson, Cotch) I'll look to go Viney --> Redden in Round 12!

He averaged something like 101 before and 105 after....... flower all diff so would you like to explain how lol :P

Jack Redden

Rounds 1-10: 82, 105, 77, 74, 84, 112, 121, 99, 126, 127 = 100.7 average

Rounds 10-23: 93, 125, 110, 66, 89, 112, 109, 93, 108, 121, 121, 104 = 104.25 average

I thought he had a much better second half too, not much difference really. :o

[picker_man]

yeah those stats definantly do not mean he has proven anything, lock and load from round 1.

[essendon2]

Redden has proven that he is better after his bye, I'm not saying he won't do well pre-bye, I hope he does, so he can reward all the ballsy coaches that put him in! But since I'm starting with only 4 MID Guns (Swa, Ablett, Watson, Cotch) I'll look to go Viney --> Redden in Round 12!

He averaged something like 101 before and 105 after....... flower all diff so would you like to explain how lol :P

Jack Redden

Rounds 1-10: 82, 105, 77, 74, 84, 112, 121, 99, 126, 127 = 100.7 average

Rounds 10-23: 93, 125, 110, 66, 89, 112, 109, 93, 108, 121, 121, 104 = 104.25 average

I thought he had a much better second half too, not much difference really. :o

still good upgrade target!

[Football Factory]

I think the reason people like the look of Redden now is because we have 8 mids, Redden is much more appealing especially with the draw Brisbane have and his reasonable price along with his round 11 bye. You would think with age and another pre-season he will only get better.

[essendon2]

I think the reason people like the look of Redden now is because we have 8 mids, Redden is much more appealing especially with the draw Brisbane have and his reasonable price along with his round 11 bye. You would think with age and another pre-season he will only get better.

almost tempted to put Redden back in instead of Cotchin just because of their first 5 rounds - 2 @ Gabba, 2 @ Etihad. Dt Slut Galore

WB, Adelaide, GC, NM, Melbourne..



Cotchin + Broughton
vs
Redden + Heppell + 20k

[Adamant]

I think the reason people like the look of Redden now is because we have 8 mids, Redden is much more appealing especially with the draw Brisbane have and his reasonable price along with his round 11 bye. You would think with age and another pre-season he will only get better.

almost tempted to put Redden back in instead of Cotchin just because of their first 5 rounds - 2 @ Gabba, 2 @ Etihad. Dt Slut Galore

WB, Adelaide, GC, NM, Melbourne..



Cotchin + Broughton
vs
Redden + Heppell + 20k

Cotchin and Broughton is more risky, but high reward. Redden and Heppell is the safe option.

I'd go Redden and Broughts myself + a lot of cash to upgrade other areas.

[essendon2]

I think the reason people like the look of Redden now is because we have 8 mids, Redden is much more appealing especially with the draw Brisbane have and his reasonable price along with his round 11 bye. You would think with age and another pre-season he will only get better.

almost tempted to put Redden back in instead of Cotchin just because of their first 5 rounds - 2 @ Gabba, 2 @ Etihad. Dt Slut Galore

WB, Adelaide, GC, NM, Melbourne..



Cotchin + Broughton
vs
Redden + Heppell + 20k

Cotchin and Broughton is more risky, but high reward. Redden and Heppell is the safe option.

I'd go Redden and Broughts myself + a lot of cash to upgrade other areas.

that's even riskier!!

6 Gun fwds... Goldstein + Leuenberger ,

[picker_man]

Nah agree with Adz, when he says Cotch is risky its not cause he could ave under 100 its becasue of his price, add Broughton going to a new club and the price difference between all involved makes the first option more risky

I'd have Cotch, Redden and Heppel and try find the extra from elsewere ;)

[tbagrocks]

Redden and Hepster are locked in 8)

[essendon2]

Redden and Hepster are locked in 8)

+1

broughton + pendles + roughead + cox
vs
grimes + watson + goldstein + stevie jay

[tbagrocks]

Hmm ok: Grimes, Goldstein, Pendlebury, SJ

nice one E2

Dangerfield + Knights + Fyfe + Otten

Shuey + Varcoe + Mundy + Russell

[essendon2]

Hmm ok: Grimes, Goldstein, Pendlebury, SJ

nice one E2

Dangerfield + Knights + Fyfe + Otten

Shuey + Varcoe + Mundy + Russell

Watson > Pendlebury (bias)

Dangerfield (112) + Knights (78) + Fyfe (102) + Otten (75)
vs
Shuey (90) + Varcoe (75) + Mundy (105) + Russell (82)

Option 1

[Adamant]

Hmm ok: Grimes, Goldstein, Pendlebury, SJ

nice one E2

Dangerfield + Knights + Fyfe + Otten

Shuey + Varcoe + Mundy + Russell

Watson > Pendlebury (bias)

Dangerfield (112) + Knights (78) + Fyfe (102) + Otten (75)
vs
Shuey (90) + Varcoe (75) + Mundy (105) + Russell (82)

Option 1

Shuey only 90? he averaged 94 this year and 100 if you remove his injury affected game.

I agree with option 1, but here are my predicted averages... tbag will probably disagree with my Dangerfield prediction.

Dangerfield (109) + Knights (78) + Fyfe (104) + Otten (73)

Shuey (101) + Varcoe (74) + Mundy (106) + Russell (70)

[Ziplock]

dangerfield, 95.

[essendon2]

Hmm ok: Grimes, Goldstein, Pendlebury, SJ

nice one E2

Dangerfield + Knights + Fyfe + Otten

Shuey + Varcoe + Mundy + Russell

Watson > Pendlebury (bias)

Dangerfield (112) + Knights (78) + Fyfe (102) + Otten (75)
vs
Shuey (90) + Varcoe (75) + Mundy (105) + Russell (82)

Option 1

Shuey only 90? he averaged 94 this year and 100 if you remove his injury affected game.

I agree with option 1, but here are my predicted averages... tbag will probably disagree with my Dangerfield prediction.

Dangerfield (109) + Knights (78) + Fyfe (104) + Otten (73)

Shuey (101) + Varcoe (74) + Mundy (106) + Russell (70)

sorry, typo 99* Shuey