The Incredible Fantastic Thread Where All Combo Questions Will Be Answered!

Started by Adamant, January 08, 2013, 10:58:42 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Toga

Quote from: blues boy on March 12, 2013, 06:17:16 PM
Quote from: Toga on March 12, 2013, 05:53:49 PM
Quote from: blues boy on March 12, 2013, 04:44:37 PM
Fyfe/J.Mcveigh + N. Riewoldt

S.Thompson/Stanton + T. Cloke/Varcoe

Fyfe (104) + Nroo (83)

Stants/Thommo (109) + Cloke (88)

Dead even mate. Would probably go Option 2 though as those players are more likely to go higher than i've predicted than the others.


option a) = 187
option b) = 197

haha how is that dead even?

I do maths good ::)

Sorry mate haha ::)

blues boy

Quote from: Toga on March 12, 2013, 06:29:21 PM
Quote from: blues boy on March 12, 2013, 06:17:16 PM
Quote from: Toga on March 12, 2013, 05:53:49 PM
Quote from: blues boy on March 12, 2013, 04:44:37 PM
Fyfe/J.Mcveigh + N. Riewoldt

S.Thompson/Stanton + T. Cloke/Varcoe

Fyfe (104) + Nroo (83)

Stants/Thommo (109) + Cloke (88)

Dead even mate. Would probably go Option 2 though as those players are more likely to go higher than i've predicted than the others.


option a) = 187
option b) = 197

haha how is that dead even?

I do maths good ::)

Sorry mate haha ::)

Haha all good!


Cloke (F4) + Neade (F8)

OR

Leuenberger (R2) + Varcoe (F6)
I do have cover for leuenberger if he doesnt play RD1

Jukes

Quote from: blues boy on March 12, 2013, 06:43:41 PM
Cloke (F4) + Neade (F8)

OR

Leuenberger (R2) + Varcoe (F6)
I do have cover for leuenberger if he doesnt play RD1

Cloke 86, Neade 58
vs
Leuey 80, Varcoe 77

Dutchie64

Another Ruck Combo question:

Cox & Z.Smith vs Mumford & Griffin

Which combo would score better and which one would have better upside?

Or would you recommend another ruck combo instead?

Jukes

Quote from: Dutchie64 on March 12, 2013, 10:15:49 PM
Another Ruck Combo question:

Cox & Z.Smith vs Mumford & Griffin

Which combo would score better and which one would have better upside?

Or would you recommend another ruck combo instead?

Cox 97, Smith 75
vs
Mummy 86, Griffin 80

Dutchie64


Toga

Fyfe + Hibberd + O'Hailpin

Fyfe + Armstrong + JJ Kennedy/other under 320K

Stanton + Armstrong + O'Hailpin

Jukes

Quote from: Toga on March 12, 2013, 10:33:33 PM
Fyfe + Hibberd + O'Hailpin

Fyfe + Armstrong + JJ Kennedy/other under 320K

Stanton + Armstrong + O'Hailpin

Fyfe 103, Hibberd 85, Setanta 60
vs
Fyfe 103, Armstrong 80, Karnezis 79
vs
Stants 113, Armstrong 80, Setanta 60

Toga


Toga

Aaaaaaaand another one ::)

Monfries + Knights

Zorko + Spangher/Staker/T.Lee


Thanks so much guys really appreciate your advice :) :)

Jukes

Quote from: Toga on March 12, 2013, 11:17:21 PM
Aaaaaaaand another one ::)

Monfries + Knights

Zorko + Spangher/Staker/T.Lee


Thanks so much guys really appreciate your advice :) :)

Gus 80, Knights 73
vs
Zorks 98, Lee 58

Ricochet

Quote from: Toga on March 12, 2013, 11:17:21 PM
Aaaaaaaand another one ::)

Monfries + Knights

Zorko + Spangher/Staker/T.Lee


Thanks so much guys really appreciate your advice :) :)
Second one easy man.
And one for you... Whats Knights JS like?

Toga

Thanks lads :)

Ric, nice question! I would be stoked if I could answer it confidently for you haha but I'm still not absolutely sure.

In my opinion Knightsy SHOULD be comfortably on our best 22 playing on the forward flank - last year this position was shared by Addam Maric and Brett O'Hanlon, who I am confident Knights is both better and more damaging than. That booming left foot would add just another touch of class to our half forward line. That being said I am a bit worries about his absence from the NAB cup, it's been unexplained and has been over consecutive weeks, not just a one off. Maybe they're managing him so that we can unleash him in the premiership season but there is a seed of doubt that he might be struggling with an injury or something. But I think it would be more so to do with managing him whilst also giving the young kids a run.

Imo he should have good JS as he is better than our other half fwd options but I would watch closely to see if he is named for this weekend's trial match vs the Doggies - if he's named, that will just about confirm for me that he is just being managed so he's right for round 1 and there's nothing to worry about.

Hope that helped! :)

Ricochet


Toga

Heppell (D3) + Pittard (D4)

vs

Hibberd (D3) + Ellis/Armstrong (D4)