The Incredible Fantastic Thread Where All Combo Questions Will Be Answered!

[Jukes]

Stevenson is the best rookie pick imo for 2013. I rate his selection over Vlastuin, ie with the price gain. Experienced already with past afl experienced, has 2 wafl premierships and a wafl team of the year selection at Claremont, and will score very nicely coming off half back.

Also, 3000th post :3

[Windigo]

And your first post without a rant about Lake, Boxxy, Stants, GAJ being shower ect.  :P

Good work.  :D

[timmyparso]

Stevenson is the best rookie pick imo for 2013. I rate his selection over Vlastuin, ie with the price gain. Experienced already with past afl experienced, has 2 wafl premierships and a wafl team of the year selection at Claremont, and will score very nicely coming off half back.

Also, 3000th post :3

It was good to see Port not use Stevenson as a low dt scoring lockdown defender. Port looked like they are preparing Campbell Heath so his scores wlil be lower.

[Ricochet]

Stevenson is the best rookie pick imo for 2013. I rate his selection over Vlastuin, ie with the price gain. Experienced already with past afl experienced, has 2 wafl premierships and a wafl team of the year selection at Claremont, and will score very nicely coming off half back.

Also, 3000th post :3

Agree with Jukes and Ele here... Have seen a lot of him in the WAFL and he can play. Not sure where he fits in at Port though

Congrats Jukes  :D

[Jukes]

And your first post without a rant about Lake, Boxxy, Stants, GAJ being shower ect.  :P

Good work.  :D

Lake over Cloke?

[Dutchie64]

Nah, Cloke over Lake I reckon,

Lake has to share the points with Birch/Suckling et al....

Got a combo question (not sure if been asked already)

Murpy+Embley vs Ball+ Maloney

[Jukes]

Murpy+Embley vs Ball+ Maloney

Murph 106, Embers 86
vs
Ball 87, Maloney 89

Yeah I'd defs be going that first option :P

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Here's mine, a long one.

Tambling, Wines, Maric, Gorringe, Sylvia, Neade

vs

Grimes, Jesse Lonergan, Cox, Currie, Patton, Witts

[Dutchie64]

Bloody hell Jukes......that ain't an easy one ;D

Without going into total scores for both sets of players I personally would go for option 2.

The reason for that is that I feel the second lot has got more JS than the first and therefor would score you more points and gain coin

Maybe a simplistic way of looking at it.......but there it is!!!

[essendon2]

Stanley + Redden
vs
Heppell + Boyd/Watson
vs
Hartlett + Boyd/Watson/Beams

[Jukes]

cheers duchie. I'd pm'ed it to ads and he said the same thing, outstanding majority then :P

Stanley + Redden
vs
Heppell + Boyd/Watson
vs
Hartlett + Boyd/Watson/Beams

Stanley 94, Redden 107 = 201
vs
Dys 96, Boyd 116 = 212
vs
HH 88, Boyd 116 = 204

Dys and Boydy easily.

[POK252]

Knights (F5) + Sylvia (F3) + Viney (M10)
or
Patton (F5) + Martin (F3) + J.Lonergan (M8)

Bear in mind I only have 3 MID rookies atm so if I get Lonergan it will probably push O'Meara to the pine  :-\

[stew42]

Having the choice of whether to field O'Meara or Lonergan is not a bad thing!

Knights (73, but could go 80) Sylvia (87) Viney (63) = 223
vs
Patton (64) Martin (89) Lonergan (68) = 221

I'd probably go with a, Knights might well end up being a keeper, which I can't see Patton doing. Also I think Viney has more JS than Lonergan, who might be at risk of being rotated throughout the season.

[Jukes]

Knights (F5) + Sylvia (F3) + Viney (M10)
or
Patton (F5) + Martin (F3) + J.Lonergan (M8)

Bear in mind I only have 3 MID rookies atm so if I get Lonergan it will probably push O'Meara to the pine  :-\

Second option.

[pommyadam]

Cox + Duffield
or
Chapman + Heppell

[Jukes]

Cox + Duffield
or
Chapman + Heppell

Cox 99, Duffield 87
vs
Chappy 98, Heppel 96

Second option certainly.