The Incredible Fantastic Thread Where All Combo Questions Will Be Answered!

[Ricochet]

Yep agree with Jukes. Both are massive risks even when they do come back. They both had very decent injuries.
Surely there are better options left?

[blackrose]

I picked both these 2 up with my last and 2nd last pick and am deciding which one to drop...

Maybe I should drop both? Really aren't many decent forwards/backs in the free agency and the players I pick up will probably sit on my bench the season barring injury/rest. Whereas one of these two might break out of their reverie and become a permanent field option...

[Windigo]

Robbo & Embers

Or

Moloney & Wright

[Jukes]

Robbo & Embers

Or

Moloney & Wright

101 and 86
vs
89 and 92

First one easily.

[essendon2]

Robbo & Embers

Or

Moloney & Wright

98 + 85

vs

90 + 95

[Ricochet]

Robbo & Embers

Or

Moloney & Wright

101 and 86
vs
89 and 92

First one easily.

Agree with Jukes here. Robbo to push 100+ and Embers to go close to 90+
Moloney should hit around 90 and Wright 88-90

[essendon2]

Robbo & Embers

Or

Moloney & Wright

101 and 86
vs
89 and 92

First one easily.

Agree with Jukes here. Robbo to push 100+ and Embers to go close to 90+
Moloney should hit around 90 and Wright 88-90

Why is everyone so set on Robbo going 100+, he's averaged 91 and 92 for the past two years

[Ricochet]

Robbo & Embers

Or

Moloney & Wright

101 and 86
vs
89 and 92

First one easily.

Agree with Jukes here. Robbo to push 100+ and Embers to go close to 90+
Moloney should hit around 90 and Wright 88-90

Why is everyone so set on Robbo going 100+, he's averaged 91 and 92 for the past two years

http://www.fanfooty.com.au/forum/index.php/topic,71278.0.html

Mitch Robinson.

18 games in 2012 at an average of 92.8, which ranks him as the 10th highest averaging forward.

He is often labelled as 'inconsistent', but looking into his scores, he is actually the opposite of that. In 2012, he scored 82+ in all but 4 games. 2 of these 4 games were in rounds 20 & 21, when he was still recovering from a serious eye injury (which caused him to miss the 4 weeks prior). If we remove these scores, his average shoots up to 99.4, so he is arguably underpriced at $478,600. His ceiling is also quite big, with 9 x 100+ scores (50% of his games) and a top score of 146.

He is only 23 years old, so still has a lot of improvement in him. He is a loose unit, but with 44 trades, the risk is marginal at best. I can see him going 100+ under Mick, and barring injury, he is a lock in my side.

Will you be starting him?

[Ziplock]

yeah, he was going 100+ until he got injured.

[blues boy]

Jack Watts + Nick Vlastiun with $40,000 left

or

Hamish Hartlet + L. Stevenson with $18,000 left

[Jukes]

Jack Watts + Nick Vlastiun with $40,000 left

or

Hamish Hartlet + L. Stevenson with $18,000 left

Watts 83, Vlas 73, 4.27
vs
HH 88, Lewey 67

Option (a) with and without the cash bonus.

[Ricochet]

Jack Watts + Nick Vlastiun with $40,000 left

or

Hamish Hartlet + L. Stevenson with $18,000 left

I think you have to go option b
Hartlett  is a potential keeper, watts won't be

[elephants]

Jack Watts + Nick Vlastiun with $40,000 left

or

Hamish Hartlet + L. Stevenson with $18,000 left

Watts + Stevo ;)

[tbagrocks]

I'm not sold on Stevensons JS right now, Heath, Wines, Mitchell are gunning it

But i'd back Port on selecting the promising young talent, Moore, Newton, and well before Mitchell

[elephants]

Stevenson is a jet mate, was getting tagged on a regular basis in the WAFL (when playing half-back) and was always in the best.
Devastated we (WCE) let him go :(