The Incredible Fantastic Thread Where All Combo Questions Will Be Answered!

blues boy · February 25, 2013, 09:00:52 PM

Quote from: Jukes on February 25, 2013, 08:53:46 PM
Quote from: blues boy on February 25, 2013, 08:27:13 PM
moloney and embley with $60,000 left over
or
fyfe and wines with $15,000 left over

Moloney 89, Embers 85, + 8.738
vs
Fyfe 101, Wines 83

=174+8.738 vs 184

I'd defs go the second option then, even with the price advantage calculated in, although I have both the top option players as they're great value and only Wines from (b).

whats the + 8.738???

Jukes · February 25, 2013, 09:03:47 PM

Whenever there's a noticable/included price differiential I add to the cheaper side the amount available divided by the magic number to find out, based on last season's averages, how much worth of average that money is worth.

Addition = $/MN
MN= 5150 for season 2013

blues boy · February 25, 2013, 09:05:30 PM

Quote from: Jukes on February 25, 2013, 09:03:47 PM
Whenever there's a noticable/included price differiential I add to the cheaper side the amount available divided by the magic number to find out, based on last season's averages, how much worth of average that money is worth.

Addition = $/MN
MN= 5150 for season 2013

Oh okay fair enough thanks! i think moloney and embley will be the safer option

Jukes · February 25, 2013, 09:07:45 PM

Yeah I agree they're safer (unless Embers is too old and gets vested every week and Moloney falls out of favour at Brisbane :P) but with the potential for higher scores if Wines is the dt gun we're hearing and Fyfe develops to his potential I'd prefer (b).

Adamant · February 25, 2013, 09:09:59 PM

Moloney is a spud, nobody should pick him.

Toga · February 25, 2013, 09:14:33 PM

Quote from: Adamant on February 25, 2013, 09:09:59 PM
Moloney is a spud, nobody should pick him.

would have taken him off you in asians :'(

Adamant · February 25, 2013, 09:18:34 PM

Quote from: Toga on February 25, 2013, 09:14:33 PM
Quote from: Adamant on February 25, 2013, 09:09:59 PM
Moloney is a spud, nobody should pick him.

would have taken him off you in asians :'(

Haha he is gun back-up. Nobody rated him back then, but I always thought he'd make an impact at Brissy and got him very late in the draft. 8)

blues boy · February 25, 2013, 09:49:32 PM

Quote from: Adamant on February 25, 2013, 09:18:34 PM
Quote from: Toga on February 25, 2013, 09:14:33 PM
Quote from: Adamant on February 25, 2013, 09:09:59 PM
Moloney is a spud, nobody should pick him.

Haha he is gun back-up. Nobody rated him back then, but I always thought he'd make an impact at Brissy and got him very late in the draft. 8)

haha make up your mind? are you trolling?

Adamant · February 25, 2013, 09:56:23 PM

Quote from: blues boy on February 25, 2013, 09:49:32 PM
Quote from: Adamant on February 25, 2013, 09:18:34 PM
Quote from: Toga on February 25, 2013, 09:14:33 PM
Quote from: Adamant on February 25, 2013, 09:09:59 PM
Moloney is a spud, nobody should pick him.

Haha he is gun back-up. Nobody rated him back then, but I always thought he'd make an impact at Brissy and got him very late in the draft. 8)

haha make up your mind? are you trolling?

Obviously I was being sarcastic. Moloney is a jet, locked in at M5.

blues boy · February 25, 2013, 10:01:00 PM

Quote from: Adamant on February 25, 2013, 09:56:23 PM
Quote from: blues boy on February 25, 2013, 09:49:32 PM
Quote from: Adamant on February 25, 2013, 09:18:34 PM
Quote from: Toga on February 25, 2013, 09:14:33 PM
Quote from: Adamant on February 25, 2013, 09:09:59 PM
Moloney is a spud, nobody should pick him.

Haha he is gun back-up. Nobody rated him back then, but I always thought he'd make an impact at Brissy and got him very late in the draft. 8)

haha make up your mind? are you trolling?

Obviously I was being sarcastic. Moloney is a jet, locked in at M5.

Haha yeah he is locked in at my M5 too!

Jukes · February 25, 2013, 10:09:51 PM

Do neither of you guys know how to quote properly?

blues boy · February 25, 2013, 10:13:25 PM

Quote from: Jukes on February 25, 2013, 10:09:51 PM
Do neither of you guys know how to quote properly?

No not really! haha tell us how

Adamant · February 25, 2013, 10:14:47 PM

Quote from: Jukes on February 25, 2013, 10:09:51 PM
Do neither of you guys know how to quote properly?

If you read our conversation, you'd see that blues boy was the one who stuffed up the quote. I couldn't be bothered changing it, so just left it inside the actual quote. Blame him. ;)

RookieDTer · February 26, 2013, 08:42:20 AM

Grimes (D2) and Fyfe (Weak M4)
V
Hartlett or Suckling (Or Broughton, but prob not) at (D4) and Murphy (M4)

Think Fyfe is underpriced.
Grimes is just good.

Not a fan of Hartlett as he is too injury prone.... but, can just trade him out easily, I suppose. DPP link is nice to.
Don't know enough about Suckling.
Broughton didn't play well last match (knee jerk!?)

Murphy is underpriced.

So, sticking with (1)... what do you guys think?

Holz · February 26, 2013, 10:43:42 AM

Quote from: RookieDTer on February 26, 2013, 08:42:20 AM
Grimes (D2) and Fyfe (Weak M4)
V
Hartlett or Suckling (Or Broughton, but prob not) at (D4) and Murphy (M4)

Think Fyfe is underpriced.
Grimes is just good.

Not a fan of Hartlett as he is too injury prone.... but, can just trade him out easily, I suppose. DPP link is nice to.
Don't know enough about Suckling.
Broughton didn't play well last match (knee jerk!?)

Murphy is underpriced.

So, sticking with (1)... what do you guys think?

Hartlett and Murhpy just.

huge grimes fan, just think hartlett could start on fire and esily go 90+ over the first month. Murphy for me could go top 8 mids, dont think fyfe will.

So go the potentialy top 6 back and top 8 mid.

Moloney + Murphy

v

Embley + Boyd