The Incredible Fantastic Thread Where All Combo Questions Will Be Answered!

[Windigo]

Because many think Pendles is a better cheaper selection.

I'd go option one. I'd take Pendles over Beams, but that's just me and Beams should have another ripper season.

Don't trust Scooter to score as well as Fyfe. Goodes looks a better bet than Stevo as well. 8)

_______________

Boyd (M3) & Vlastuin (D4) +Pittard (D5) + Goodes (D6)

Or

Murphy (M5) & Tambling (D4) + Vlastuin (D5) + Goodes (D6)

[RookieDTer]

Because many think Pendles is a better cheaper selection.

I'd go option one. I'd take Pendles over Beams, but that's just me and Beams should have another ripper season.

Don't trust Scooter to score as well as Fyfe. Goodes looks a better bet than Stevo as well. 8)

_______________

Boyd (M3) & Vlastuin (D4) +Pittard (D5) + Goodes (D6)

Or

Murphy (M5) & Tambling (D4) + Vlastuin (D5) + Goodes (D6)

Cheers, all valid points.

I'm thinking about going from Beams to Pendles anyway, but I can't find anywhere else to spend the spare cash - and Beams SHOULD outscore, and having him as VC in this case is obviously preferred.

Not a massive fan of Boyd, but am of Murphy.
I'm trying to get Tambling in my team (possibly even first upgrade?!).

So, leaning towards option 2 -would depend on your other mids... but Murphy at 5 implies your mids are already more than strong enough - so Boyd to Muprhy isn't a bad thing.

*CONSIDER* Pittard over Vlastuin - esp. if you can use the spare cash.

[Jukes]

Boyd (M3) & Vlastuin (D4) +Pittard (D5) + Goodes (D6)

Or

Murphy (M5) & Tambling (D4) + Vlastuin (D5) + Goodes (D6)

Boydy 116, Pittard 65
vs
Murphy 106, Bling 80
=181 vs 186, (b) wins. (a) has much less risk but I reckon (b) will score higher. Get on Bling.

Interesting one for ya....
Beams (VC) (M2), Fyfe (M4) and B.Goodes (D7 at the moment)
v
Pendles (VC) (M2), Scott Selwood (M4) and L. Stevenson (D7)

Beamsy 115, Fyfey 101, Goodesy 65
vs
Pendles 118, Scotty 100, Lewey 65
=A (b) win narrowly.

[RookieDTer]

Get on Bling.

Interesting one for ya....
Beams (VC) (M2), Fyfe (M4) and B.Goodes (D7 at the moment)
v
Pendles (VC) (M2), Scott Selwood (M4) and L. Stevenson (D7)

Beamsy 115, Fyfey 101, Goodesy 65
vs
Pendles 118, Scotty 100, Lewey 65
=A (b) win narrowly.

1. Good call with Bling.

2. Not sure Lewey will match Goodes!

3. If you think Pendles is 118 and Beamsy is 115.... I might as well switch to Pendles, even if I'm not going to save the cash. I would have thought Beams would have outscored Pendles, why do you think not?

[Jukes]

Pendles is underpriced (without his sub-affected game avg 113) and went 116 in 2011 with Ball in the team, while I think Ball with have a negative impact on Beams.

Pendles in for a big season, top 3 Brownlow imo.

[stew42]

Ok, Riewoldt for the first few rounds, then I'll trade him for Daisy basically when I'm able, but if he's averaging 90+, I'll keep him a bit longer.

Or:

Dustin Martin?

[Windigo]

I'm not a fan of buggerisng about with picking players purely for their start. I'd go Dustbin.

[Holz]

Cloke, Sylvia or Bruest?

watts :)

legit?

is he in your team then?  :P

i have 4-5 guys vying for a the 1 spot in my forward line. he is one of them.

got to keep producing in the NAB

[essendon2]

Redden + Zorko/Robbo
vs
Pendles + Martin

[Windigo]

Redden + Zorko/Robbo
vs
Pendles + Martin

Pendles has Redden covered easily and I see no reason why Martin & Robbo can't average similar numbers. But getting Pendles in there sways it to option 2.  8)

[essendon2]

Redden + Zorko/Robbo
vs
Pendles + Martin

Pendles has Redden covered easily and I see no reason why Martin & Robbo can't average similar numbers. But getting Pendles in there sways it to option 2.  8)

hmmm that settles that  ;D

now just
Tambling + any fwd
vs
Martin/Wright + Russell

[Noz]

Scott Selwood + Brent Moloney

V

Matthew Boyd + Andrew Embley

[Noz]

Redden + Zorko/Robbo
vs
Pendles + Martin

Pendles has Redden covered easily and I see no reason why Martin & Robbo can't average similar numbers. But getting Pendles in there sways it to option 2.  8)

hmmm that settles that  ;D

now just
Tambling + any fwd
vs
Martin/Wright + Russell

Watch to see where Tambling is named and if he avoids the vest in their first game, If so i would be slightly towards option A, Russell may have a bit better JS than Tambling but the premium forward should make up for that.

[Windigo]

Yeah, the Bling is very iffy ATM, but at his price and been in the system for few years with some solid NAB scores he could be a good sneaky cash cow down back. But it is Tambling after all..... :-\

__________________

Boyd & Embers.

S.S & Boyd aren't even in the same category. Embers should average a little less than Moloney. But I'd take that seeing as you afford Boydy.  8)

[Jukes]

Scott Selwood + Brent Moloney
V
Matthew Boyd + Andrew Embley

Selwood 100, Moloney 89
vs
Boyd 116, Embers 85
=189 vs 201
(b) easily

Tambling + any fwd
vs
Martin/Wright + Russell

Bling 83, Zorko 103
vs
Wright 92, Russell 80
=186 vs 172
(a) easily imo