The Incredible Fantastic Thread Where All Combo Questions Will Be Answered!

Started by Adamant, January 08, 2013, 10:58:42 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

timmyparso

Quote from: Adamant on March 04, 2013, 08:24:04 PM
Quote from: Windigo on March 04, 2013, 08:20:43 PM
I was never keen on Sippos. Was luke warm on Tambling.

But Karnezis destroyed the NEAFL.  :P
Quote
Only problem is my backline is now: Goddard, Gibbs, Hartlett, Goodes, Pittard, Stevenson (Docherty, Terlich)

It just means your strong elsewhere.  :)

Fair enough, but I didn't hear anyone mention Karnezis before his latest NAB game. I just think people are getting too carried away based on a strong NAB performance.

Footy tragic gave a good write up last week, before his NAB game.

http://www.footytragic.com/blog/2013-pre-season/mid-pricers-patrick-karnezis/

stew42

Neade (F7) NRoo (F4) Fyfe (M5)
vs
Patton (F7) Broughton (F4) DanHan (M5)

Note that Patton and Broughton have "ton" in their names. I hope you take that into consideration.

essendon2

Varcoe v Byrnes v Knights
Hartlett v Duffman
Murphy v Redden v J.Selwood v Dangerfield v A.Swallow

Toga

Quote from: stew42 on March 05, 2013, 03:33:16 AM
Neade (F7) NRoo (F4) Fyfe (M5)
vs
Patton (F7) Broughton (F4) DanHan (M5)

Note that Patton and Broughton have "ton" in their names. I hope you take that into consideration.

Neade (63) + Nroo (89) + Fyfe (102) =254

Patton (68) + Broughton (92) + Hannebery (87) =247

I'd go with option one but I'd just about be tempted to go with Broughts over Nroo - he's cheaper and imo will average more. :)




Quote from: essendon2 on March 05, 2013, 09:56:22 AM
Varcoe v Byrnes v Knights
Hartlett v Duffman
Murphy v Redden v J.Selwood v Dangerfield v A.Swallow

Varcoe (74) vs Byrnes (72) vs Knights (82)


Hartlett (92) vs Duffield (89)


Murphy (111) vs Redden (112) vs Selwood (108) vs Dangerfield (109) vs Swallow (111)

Jukes

Quote from: stew42 on March 05, 2013, 03:33:16 AM
Neade (F7) NRoo (F4) Fyfe (M5)
vs
Patton (F7) Broughton (F4) DanHan (M5)

Note that Patton and Broughton have "ton" in their names. I hope you take that into consideration.

I'm halving the bench player scores as they have less impact.

Neade 60/2 + Roo 88 + Fyfe 100
vs
Patton 72/2 + Broughts 86 + Hannenbery 89
=218 vs 211
First option.

Quote from: essendon2 on March 05, 2013, 09:56:22 AM
Varcoe v Byrnes v Knights
Hartlett v Duffman
Murphy v Redden v J.Selwood v Dangerfield v A.Swallow
Varcoe 76 vs 70 vs 70
Hartlett 93 vs 89
106 vs Redden 107 vs Selwood 107 vs 104 vs 106

Toga

Ablett + Robinson + Knights + Mayes

Cotchin + Lewis + Broughton + Neade

Jukes

Quote from: Toga on March 05, 2013, 11:13:26 AM
Ablett + Robinson + Knights + Mayes

Cotchin + Lewis + Broughton + Neade

114 + 102 + 70 + 68/2

vs
110 + 92 + 86 + 60/2

=320 vs 318

I'd prefer Varcoe to Knights tho easily.

truBLUE


stew42

Quote from: Jukes on March 05, 2013, 11:03:22 AM
Quote from: stew42 on March 05, 2013, 03:33:16 AM
Neade (F7) NRoo (F4) Fyfe (M5)
vs
Patton (F7) Broughton (F4) DanHan (M5)

Note that Patton and Broughton have "ton" in their names. I hope you take that into consideration.

I'm halving the bench player scores as they have less impact.

Neade 60/2 + Roo 88 + Fyfe 100
vs
Patton 72/2 + Broughts 86 + Hannenbery 89
=218 vs 211
First option.


Ended up going Treloar, Sylvia, Patton. Patton will play 22 games barring injury, Treloar will benefit greatly from a full preseason, and I've never had Sylvia before, so I've never been burnt by him before :D

Toga

Heppell (D4) + Broughton (F4) + T.Lee (F7)

Stanley/Grimes (D4) + Knights (F4) + Patton (F5)

Heppell/Birchall (D4) + Knights (F4) + Karnezis (F5)

Windigo

Quote from: Toga on March 05, 2013, 04:14:14 PM
Heppell (D4) + Broughton (F4) + T.Lee (F7)

Stanley/Grimes (D4) + Knights (F4) + Patton (F5)

Heppell/Birchall (D4) + Knights (F4) + Karnezis (F5)


Lee could be a first class crab.

Knights at F4 could be dicey though. Patton could average the same, but a Key fwd is prone to some huge fluctuation in price and form.  :-\

Jukes

Quote from: truBLUE on March 05, 2013, 12:49:29 PM
Cloke v Lecras v Breust

Clokey

Quote from: Toga on March 05, 2013, 04:14:14 PM
Heppell (D4) + Broughton (F4) + T.Lee (F7)

Stanley/Grimes (D4) + Knights (F4) + Patton (F5)

Heppell/Birchall (D4) + Knights (F4) + Karnezis (F5)

Dys 96, Broughts 86, Lee 55
vs
Grimes 96, Knights 70, Patton 74
vs
Dys 96, Knights 70, Karnezis 75

Toga

Quote from: Windigo on March 05, 2013, 04:18:12 PM
Quote from: Toga on March 05, 2013, 04:14:14 PM
Heppell (D4) + Broughton (F4) + T.Lee (F7)

Stanley/Grimes (D4) + Knights (F4) + Patton (F5)

Heppell/Birchall (D4) + Knights (F4) + Karnezis (F5)


Lee could be a first class crab.

Knights at F4 could be dicey though. Patton could average the same, but a Key fwd is prone to some huge fluctuation in price and form.  :-\

I've gone ahead with that actually - and figured out that I can go Heppell + Kennedy + Karnezis which looks more respectable.

Another option is Heppell -> Harbrow and Kennedy -> Cloke :-X

Windigo

Trading Kennedy>Cloke isn't gunna gain you much. Both have their cons.  :-\

blues boy

B. McEvoy (R1) + H.Hartlett (D4) + B. Moloney(M5)

OR

I. Maric (R1) + L. Stevenson (D7) + B.Stanton/B.Deledio/J. Watson/J. Redden/J. Kennedy