The Incredible Fantastic Thread Where All Combo Questions Will Be Answered!

Started by Adamant, January 08, 2013, 10:58:42 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Adamant

Quote from: Windigo on January 09, 2013, 04:55:36 PM
Haha, no. I just re-edited my question as I've back flipped on having Pendles.  ::)

Locked in Thomas & Boyd.  :P

Haha ok. I was going to say, if you have Buddy, go Boyd and Daisy. If you don't have Buddy, go Pendles and SJ.

essendon2

Quote from: Adamant on January 09, 2013, 04:58:35 PM
Quote from: Windigo on January 09, 2013, 04:55:36 PM
Haha, no. I just re-edited my question as I've back flipped on having Pendles.  ::)

Locked in Thomas & Boyd.  :P

Haha ok. I was going to say, if you have Buddy, go Boyd and Daisy. If you don't have Buddy, go Pendles and SJ.
is anyone else worried about Thomas' durability?


Thomas + Boyd + Dangerfield
vs
Cox + Pendlebury + Redden

Adamant

Quote from: essendon2 on January 09, 2013, 05:02:28 PM
Quote from: Adamant on January 09, 2013, 04:58:35 PM
Quote from: Windigo on January 09, 2013, 04:55:36 PM
Haha, no. I just re-edited my question as I've back flipped on having Pendles.  ::)

Locked in Thomas & Boyd.  :P

Haha ok. I was going to say, if you have Buddy, go Boyd and Daisy. If you don't have Buddy, go Pendles and SJ.
is anyone else worried about Thomas' durability?


Thomas + Boyd + Dangerfield
vs
Cox + Pendlebury + Redden

Thomas (98) + Boyd (114) + Dangerfield (104)
vs
Cox (97) + Pendlebury (116) + Redden (108)

Bottom one, but I would go Daisy over Cox.

essendon2


Adamant

Quote from: essendon2 on January 09, 2013, 05:22:28 PM
Redden will average more than Murphy !

Murphy isn't in either of the combo's ???

I think Murph will go 110+, I love Redden, but he is a little overrated IMO.

picker_man

Quote from: Adamant on January 09, 2013, 05:24:39 PM
Quote from: essendon2 on January 09, 2013, 05:22:28 PM
Redden will average more than Murphy !

Murphy isn't in either of the combo's ???

I think Murph will go 110+, I love Redden, but he is a little overrated IMO.

You will regret saying that Adz, was 20 whilst ave 109 and backs it up with 103. Did drop a little this yr but would be expected for someone so young 110+ easily this year ;D

You choose Swan + Mcevoy + Martin for my dilemma was wondering if you could give a bit of a reason why as i had the other option locked in and now im not sure :-\ cheers.


essendon2

Redden + McEvoy
vs
Goldstein + Boyd

GM


Adamant

Quote from: picker_man on January 09, 2013, 05:35:56 PM
Quote from: Adamant on January 09, 2013, 05:24:39 PM
Quote from: essendon2 on January 09, 2013, 05:22:28 PM
Redden will average more than Murphy !

Murphy isn't in either of the combo's ???

I think Murph will go 110+, I love Redden, but he is a little overrated IMO.

You will regret saying that Adz, was 20 whilst ave 109 and backs it up with 103. Did drop a little this yr but would be expected for someone so young 110+ easily this year ;D

You choose Swan + Mcevoy + Martin for my dilemma was wondering if you could give a bit of a reason why as i had the other option locked in and now im not sure :-\ cheers.

Well, I have both Swanny and Ablett locked in, but Swan is still #1 in DT land. Averaged a massive 133 and only dropped below the ton once... and that was sub affected. I know that many people prefer Ablett due to price, but I reckon Swanny will outscore him by 3-5 points.

McEvoy and Jacobs are very even and really comes down to personal preference. McEvoy is more consistent as he only dropped below 80 three times, but Jacobs has a much higher ceiling.

There were so many times this year where Dusty killed it up until half time, and then would drop off. I read a stat and I think he averaged 54 in the first half and 30 in the second. With another pre-season under his belt, I expect a 90-95 average. I still rate Daisy over him, but Daisy's ankle surgery may mean a slow start to the year.


GM

Quote from: Adamant on January 09, 2013, 05:54:55 PM
Quote from: greenmoon on January 09, 2013, 05:40:11 PM
Quote from: Adamant on January 09, 2013, 05:37:24 PM
Quote from: greenmoon on January 09, 2013, 05:32:13 PM
Boyd/Stringer
   or
Embley/Daisy

Tough one, would Embley be your M5 or M6?
M5 mate

Boyd and Stringer is the safe option, I would lean towards them tbh.
Cheers Ant,just your thoughts on Cox being a top 6 fwd by years end?

essendon2

last one!
then my team is pretty complete

Cotchin + Grimes + Goldstein
vs
Redden + Heppell + Roughead

Adamant

Quote from: greenmoon on January 09, 2013, 06:00:18 PM
Quote from: Adamant on January 09, 2013, 05:54:55 PM
Quote from: greenmoon on January 09, 2013, 05:40:11 PM
Quote from: Adamant on January 09, 2013, 05:37:24 PM
Quote from: greenmoon on January 09, 2013, 05:32:13 PM
Boyd/Stringer
   or
Embley/Daisy

Tough one, would Embley be your M5 or M6?
M5 mate
Cheers Ant,Do you think Cox will be a  top 6 fwd?

Boyd and Stringer is the safe option, I would lean towards them tbh.

I think Cox will average around 95-98 which should place him in the top 6 forwards... just.

Football Factory

Quote from: essendon2 on January 09, 2013, 06:01:31 PM
last one!
then my team is pretty complete

Cotchin + Grimes + Goldstein
vs
Redden + Heppell + Roughead

Cotchin + Grimes + Goldy

I can see all 3 of these guys averaging more than the other 3


Redden + Varcoe

    vs

Johnson + Wines