is ziebell the dangerfield of 2013?

[starz]

ive been looking through the drafts and it looks as though a lot of people that broke out came from the 2007 draft (ie. cotchin ebert and danger). therefore i thouhgt if we go ahead to the next draft then maybe the 2008 is the year of breakouts. alot of similarities between danger and ziebell. i have a feeling that he may lift his possesion rate this year and become a really good player. i would only consider in sc. only problem with my theory above is that he has broke his leg which may have impacted his development. anyway just thought i would put it out there.

[tbagrocks]

Almost worth a go with 30 trades and 10 mids, doubt he'll get the ave of a Cotch/Danger though

[Torress]

danger was awsome in 2012 no doubt about it. i started him just for the role chgange but didn't expect what he did - will north be as good as adelaide?? i don;t think so, imo i'm not confident they will make the 8 this year again. with blues and bombers pitching their claims for starters; someone has to squeeze out. so imo they aren't the team that crows are and just on that alone i don't think he'll hit the heights set by danger...

he has been looming tho, i like the way he goes about it - tough player! and is a tough guy to pick, not sure even if he has a breakout year if he'll be a keeper??? he is on the radar i wouldn't rule him out, but we get ball or embley for cheaper and are safer. you know, and i like mundy around that price - more proven and with sandi handing down  clearances at will??!!

danger actually is a legit jet as well, runner and footy player.

[shorty3264]

Not quite Dangerfield, but Ziebell is worth a midfield spot, I reckon he's ready to explode in a up and coming quality side. average of 105+ i reckon.

[starz]

Good point about the differences between Adelaide and North. I had a look over their stats and before  their fourth years they both had 7 hundreds. And ziebell has shown glimpses with a 41 disposal game and an awesome 4 goal game from the mids against Geelong this year. I probably wouldnt expect him to go 115+ but if I got 110 I'd be stoked which I think is possible. I see it as sort of pickin Andrew swallow for a cheaper price. I'm planning on loading up in the mids so he could be my m6

[theta]

I was thinking of the dangerfield comparison just a couple of days ago - but I'd be more comfortable saving some cash and backing someone who's already been there like a Moloney, Rischitelli or Ball, and even they are a tad expensive.

IF he breaks out I cant see him averaging more than 105.  I see him finishing at 93.

No from me.

[starz]

You see that's exactly what I think but then again that's what everyone said about danger last year. I guess only time( and the man cup) will tell.

[starz]

Any thoughts on who the dangerfield of 2013 will be?

[tbagrocks]

Any thoughts on who the dangerfield of 2013 will be?

Fyfe, Caddy, Hannabery, D Swallow, Broadbent, Dusty

[My Chumps]

Not sold on Ziebell, know a few people who got burnt by him last year after killiing it in his first few games back.

From that draft though, I'd say there are a few breakout candidates. I like Harlett, Yarran, Shuey, Watts, Zaharakis, Hannebery, Sloane, and maybe even (bit more risky) Stephen Hill, Sam Blease, Hayden Ballentyne and Michael Hurley.

A pretty good draft that one!

[meow meow]

No.

[theta]

No.

ftfy

[kilbluff1985]

Any thoughts on who the dangerfield of 2013 will be?

Fyfe, Caddy, Hannabery, D Swallow, Broadbent, Dusty

BEN HOWLETT

[starz]

Out of those I like fyfe hannebery and shuey. Why howlett?

[kilbluff1985]

Out of those I like fyfe hannebery and shuey. Why howlett?

kids a gun being groomed to play like Watson, averages more tackles a game then anyone ever, very good ball winner think he has what it takes to be an elite mid