Pendlebury or Swan?

[nostradamus]

Both without a second thought

[theta]

Pendles.  Im not convinced Swan wont have some minor-Cousins problems this year - I think he's bored of footy and his lack of passion for the game may clash with Buckleys fanatic obsession.  Could be a catalyst that destabilises the team if they dont keep him under control.

He'll still kickass though, 125+, but wont play more than 18 imo.

[tbagrocks]

Imo "and maybe a big call" Pendlebury will never be the footballer of Swan. Guys like Swan will always be of more importance than a Pendlebury, how he doesn't score higer in SC baffles me (rigged?)

When Buckley put Swan forward last year (with minimal success), Collingwood started losing, every time

Swan is one of the greats of the moden era and i'm not quite sure he's done yet!

[bowyanger]

Pendles.  Im not convinced Swan wont have some minor-Cousins problems this year - I think he's bored of footy and his lack of passion for the game may clash with Buckleys fanatic obsession.  Could be a catalyst that destabilises the team if they dont keep him under control.

He'll still kickass though, 125+, but wont play more than 18 imo.

Great post...good to see some other people think outside the square

[Southstorm]

Pendlebury isn't even at his peak just yet.

[kilbluff1985]

Pendlebury isn't even at his peak just yet.

+1

[JBs-Hawks]

Imo "and maybe a big call" Pendlebury will never be the footballer of Swan. Guys like Swan will always be of more importance than a Pendlebury, how he doesn't score higer in SC baffles me (rigged?)

When Buckley put Swan forward last year (with minimal success), Collingwood started losing, every time

Swan is one of the greats of the moden era and i'm not quite sure he's done yet!

If i was an AFL coach id take Pendles over Swan every day of the week

[upthemaidens]

It's not a mistake to start with none, one or both.
  If I was to speculate I would say Pendles will score more points for the year