Main Menu

EXV: 2013 Rookie Draft

Started by Scrads, December 18, 2012, 11:06:45 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Holz

Quote from: The F.A.R.K. on December 26, 2012, 01:25:22 AM
Quote from: Adamant on December 25, 2012, 04:21:44 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on December 25, 2012, 04:19:24 PM
Quote from: Adamant on December 25, 2012, 04:05:23 PM
Both teams with the better player in bold:

Eagles: B.Gibbs, B.Goddard, H.Shaw, J.Adcock
Bashers: G.Birchall, D.Stanley, B.Houli, D.Pearce

Eagles: S.Pendlebury, M.Boyd, B.Deledio, M.Barlow
Bashers: M.Murphy, A.Swallow, N.Fyfe, M.Priddis

Eagles: T.Goldstein
Bashers: H.McIntosh

Eagles: T.Cloke, M.LeCras, B.Harvey, D.Petrie
Bashers: D.Thomas, M.Robinson, M.Pavlich, C.Rioli

Eagles: A.Carrazzo, S.Grigg
Bashers: D.Swallow, A.Sandilands



Eagles have the better team.

Fyfe and lids are even imo
Priddis ave 97 without sub game so he beats barlow
Holz defence beats us just marginally while our fwds beat his how do i say it not by a lot but more than his def beats ours

Lets say holz def is 10-20ppg better than ours remembering stanley ave 92

Our fwds are 20-30ppg better than his

Our mids are fairly even. He may win by 5-10ppg depending if boyd holds a 115 average

Then our utilities win by 15 or so ppg carrots = sandi grigg > swallow

So our team is 15-30 ppg better overall

He might have 'more' better players but our overall team wins

Why not add last years averages all together then see who wins?

In what world does priddis beat Barlow. Priddis is old and never been a DT player. Barlow has sub games too remove them and he averages 100. I cut priddis from my team as I didn't want him.

If fyfe is as good as a 110 average mid than the trade should have been rejected.

Justin Bieber

So Holz on your logic, Whitfield is equal to a 100+ average?

Holz

Quote from: whatlez on December 26, 2012, 02:20:42 AM
So Holz on your logic, Whitfield is equal to a 100+ average?

haha fair call.

I do think i win that trade but whitfield looks like he could be a better player than brlow at some stage.

I guess we will see, if fyfe really does pull out 110+ this year as a 21 year old than it will be a terrible trade. I guess the same could be said if whitfield does a tambling and barlow gets over his leg injury.

I think we will see later that whitfield is worth a 100 average 25 year old mid. But anything could happen.

Ziplock

Quote from: The F.A.R.K. on December 26, 2012, 01:25:22 AM
Quote from: Adamant on December 25, 2012, 04:21:44 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on December 25, 2012, 04:19:24 PM
Quote from: Adamant on December 25, 2012, 04:05:23 PM
Both teams with the better player in bold:

Eagles: B.Gibbs, B.Goddard, H.Shaw, J.Adcock
Bashers: G.Birchall, D.Stanley, B.Houli, D.Pearce

Eagles: S.Pendlebury, M.Boyd, B.Deledio, M.Barlow
Bashers: M.Murphy, A.Swallow, N.Fyfe, M.Priddis

Eagles: T.Goldstein
Bashers: H.McIntosh

Eagles: T.Cloke, M.LeCras, B.Harvey, D.Petrie
Bashers: D.Thomas, M.Robinson, M.Pavlich, C.Rioli

Eagles: A.Carrazzo, S.Grigg
Bashers: D.Swallow, A.Sandilands



Eagles have the better team.

Fyfe and lids are even imo
Priddis ave 97 without sub game so he beats barlow
Holz defence beats us just marginally while our fwds beat his how do i say it not by a lot but more than his def beats ours

Lets say holz def is 10-20ppg better than ours remembering stanley ave 92

Our fwds are 20-30ppg better than his

Our mids are fairly even. He may win by 5-10ppg depending if boyd holds a 115 average

Then our utilities win by 15 or so ppg carrots = sandi grigg > swallow

So our team is 15-30 ppg better overall

He might have 'more' better players but our overall team wins

Why not add last years averages all together then see who wins?

*sigh* even one of your co-coaches agreed with my summation.

comparing them on this years averages is pointless- holz traded specifically for players who had underperformed by their standards in order to build a super team- like flower he would be able to get gibbs otherwise if he'd still been a 108 average back, or cloke as a 95+ forward. That being said, that's where these players lie in scoring ability, with ease.

Let me put it this way. Gibbs beats birchall by 20 points. Goddard beats stanley by 20 points. Shaw beats houli by 10-15 points, adcock beats pearce by 10-15 points.

Pendlebury beats murphy by 5 points- why do you think I traded him, he can't deal with a tag. Boyd beats swallow by 10 points. Deledio beats Fyfe by 10 points, Barlow beats Priddis by 10 points.

goldy/ hmac are more uncertain, imo, it's goldy by 5-10 though.

Thomas beats cloke by 5 points. Robbo beats lecras by 10-15 points, pavlich beats harvey by 10 points, rioli beats petrie by maybe 3 points.

Sandi probably beats carrazzo by about 5 points, but fair enough to call it even. Grigg and swallow comes down on opinion- imo, this year they'll be equal.... grigg might win by 5 points, but I can't see there being more than a 10 point difference between them.

Your forward line wins. And maybe your utility... now stop talking, you speak an obscene amount of shower.

Adamant

#379
Alright, both teams with last years averages (with sub affected games removed):


Serbian Eagles (Holz)

DEF: B.Gibbs (92), B.Goddard (97), H.Shaw (82), J.Adcock (81)

MID: S.Pendlebury (113), M.Boyd (115), B.Deledio (110), M.Barlow (100)

RUC: T.Goldstein (85)

FWD: T.Cloke (75), M.LeCras (86*), B.Harvey (87), D.Petrie (81)

UTI: D.Swallow (82), A.Sandilands (100)




Belgian Bashers (ele + Ric + FARK)

DEF: G.Birchall (89), D.Stanley (92), B.Houli (79), D.Pearce (73)

MID: M.Murphy (105), A.Swallow (103), N.Fyfe (97), M.Priddis (97)

RUC: H.McIntosh (95)

FWD: D.Thomas (97), M.Robinson (93), M.Pavlich (95), C.Rioli (89)

UTI: A.Carrazzo (100), S.Grigg (98)




Total

Eagles: 1386

Bashers: 1402




Well, the Bashers win on last years averages, but keep in mind that Gibbs, Shaw, Goldstein and Cloke had horror years - they will all smash their 2012 averages. Also Pendles had a below par year for his standards. Anything could happen though, both very impressive teams.



Holz

nice work adamant, however add the captain bonuses and it gets much closer.

picker_man


Nails

Quote from: Adamant on December 26, 2012, 03:22:30 AM
Alright, both teams with last years averages (with sub affected games removed):


Serbian Eagles (Holz)

DEF: B.Gibbs (92), B.Goddard (97), H.Shaw (82), J.Adcock (81)

MID: S.Pendlebury (113), M.Boyd (115), B.Deledio (110), M.Barlow (100)

RUC: T.Goldstein (85)

FWD: T.Cloke (75), M.LeCras (86*), B.Harvey (87), D.Petrie (81)

UTI: D.Swallow (82), A.Sandilands (100)




Belgian Bashers (ele + Ric + FARK)

DEF: G.Birchall (89), D.Stanley (92), B.Houli (79), D.Pearce (73)

MID: M.Murphy (105), A.Swallow (103), N.Fyfe (97), M.Priddis (97)

RUC: H.McIntosh (95)

FWD: D.Thomas (97), M.Robinson (93), M.Pavlich (95), C.Rioli (89)

UTI: A.Carrazzo (100), S.Grigg (98)




Total

Eagles: 1386

Bashers: 1402




Well, the Bashers win on last years averages, but keep in mind that Gibbs, Shaw, Goldstein and Cloke had horror years - they will all smash their 2012 averages. Also Pendles had a below par year for his standards. Anything could happen though, both very impressive teams.

So The Eagles average 1386? That's cute.

Enright 80 Newman 70 Lake 76 Dempster 75

Watson 112 Thompson 105 Tuck 107 McLean 103

Minson 86

Cox 99, Johnson 102, Bartel 97, NRoo 88

Montagna 96 Hayes 97

(Averages all except 1, rounded down)

1393. Brian Lake should be 96 next season too.

The cool thing about our team though is we still have plenty of decent backup mids.

Nails

With that, I think we'll take McPharlin, should be a slight improvement over Newman if Grimes or Staker don't fire next seasons. Otherwise he'll be great depth.

Justin Bieber

So when do trading periods open?

Also why can't traded and Nat picks not cow towards list movements!!!

Scrads

I think the eagles have a better side but it may crumble from lack of depth if injuries go against them.

Think the Wolves will be behind the pack this year but anything can happen in finals in this game and I am sure I will make finals at the very least. Will be ecstatic with a top 4 finish.

The F.A.R.K.

Quote from: Adamant on December 26, 2012, 03:22:30 AM
Alright, both teams with last years averages (with sub affected games removed):


Serbian Eagles (Holz)

DEF: B.Gibbs (92), B.Goddard (97), H.Shaw (82), J.Adcock (81)

MID: S.Pendlebury (113), M.Boyd (115), B.Deledio (110), M.Barlow (100)

RUC: T.Goldstein (85)

FWD: T.Cloke (75), M.LeCras (86*), B.Harvey (87), D.Petrie (81)

UTI: D.Swallow (82), A.Sandilands (100)




Belgian Bashers (ele + Ric + FARK)

DEF: G.Birchall (89), D.Stanley (92), B.Houli (79), D.Pearce (73)

MID: M.Murphy (105), A.Swallow (103), N.Fyfe (97), M.Priddis (97)

RUC: H.McIntosh (95)

FWD: D.Thomas (97), M.Robinson (93), M.Pavlich (95), C.Rioli (89)

UTI: A.Carrazzo (100), S.Grigg (98)




Total

Eagles: 1386

Bashers: 1402




Well, the Bashers win on last years averages, but keep in mind that Gibbs, Shaw, Goldstein and Cloke had horror years - they will all smash their 2012 averages. Also Pendles had a below par year for his standards. Anything could happen though, both very impressive teams.

Remember houli fyfe thomas robinson all had below par years then add how pearce is at a new club and i dont see much difference. Still reckon we have a slightly better team and there is no doubt we have the better cover on bench. Either way other than lahug/crowsfan i cant see any other team competing with us or holz so... Smd. A few will get close (nos, jb) but can only see 3 real premiership contendors

Btw if you cant tell i love to talk trash

It takes two to tango

Holz

Its now time to add some depth to the squad I have sat back and did no research untill now but i think i have found some guys i like.

Was a zone selection pick so not sure how good he is. Was unfit last year and worked hard in the preseason to play round 5 this year, got injured round 7 but when he came back in round 14 he played every game bar 1.

He has listed as a back now and if he can be safe in GC 22 than that should help, even if he only averages 65-70

Charlie Dixon

Scrads

Holz should we compile a list of the remaining filler picks in orderso it is easier to read and understand ? I can do it in the next 15min if you want

Holz

Quote from: Scrads on December 26, 2012, 03:34:55 PM
Holz should we compile a list of the remaining filler picks in orderso it is easier to read and understand ? I can do it in the next 15min if you want

Would be good scrads. I thought it was just else and I though.