Nathan Bock confirmed DPP

Ricochet · December 12, 2012, 04:36:01 PM

If he plays enough NAB and looks fit, he will be in my side
has potential to go 80+ and make more money than some of the rookies

Justin Bieber · December 12, 2012, 04:41:38 PM

Please don't dova Hargrave!!

nrich102 · December 12, 2012, 06:14:37 PM

Quote from: whatlez on December 12, 2012, 04:41:38 PM
Please don't dova Hargrave!!

+1

Football Factory · December 12, 2012, 07:54:26 PM

Need to see some good Nab performances for me to consider .. and i dont want to hear of any general soreness or im gone :D

nostradamus · December 12, 2012, 09:56:08 PM

Quote from: Windigo on December 12, 2012, 03:43:46 PM
Yeah, I don't want to get too hyped up about him. Won't be going into my side until I see a real reason to do so TBH.

DPP is all well and great, but if the old foss cannot deliver then he won't getting a gig.

severe leg breaks are always tough to comeback from.......approach with caution

timmyparso · December 12, 2012, 11:19:20 PM

Bad leg break + 2012 average of 61 (lower due to first quarter leg break in game 4) + Broughton and Murphy to GC backline = Gold Coast less reliant on Bock for defencive rebound and lower DT scores.

May still make you money and average 65-70, but is that enough? DPP is a positive but not enough for me. Watch list only for now

Adamant · December 14, 2012, 09:39:36 PM

No room for him in my backline with the stack of rooks :-\ The Def/Fwd link is appealing though.

Toga · December 15, 2012, 08:25:37 PM

Quote from: Adamant on December 14, 2012, 09:39:36 PM
No room for him in my backline with the stack of rooks :-\ The Def/Fwd link is appealing though.

yeah the DPP link is appealing but i reckon i'll get it using Broughts and Staker instead...