My Team 1.3, popularity dissected, have a look!

Started by underdog11, December 07, 2012, 04:07:04 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Mr.Craig

Quote from: JROO8 on December 07, 2012, 05:46:31 PM
Quote from: Mr.Craig on December 07, 2012, 01:13:12 PM
Quote from: NigeyS on December 07, 2012, 12:57:11 PM
I'm surprised to see all the Richmond draftees in that list, especially considering that Vlastuin's the only one I think we'll see play this year.

Agreed.
McBean won't play games, but his fwd/ruck DPP may be handy for some coaches

My argument against that is you'll be going into the season with essentially a one man bench in either the forwards or rucks. It would be nice to have a DPP link but I'd rather pick someone I think is going to play and earn me money.

Jroo

Quote from: Mr.Craig on December 07, 2012, 05:55:07 PM
Quote from: JROO8 on December 07, 2012, 05:46:31 PM
Quote from: Mr.Craig on December 07, 2012, 01:13:12 PM
Quote from: NigeyS on December 07, 2012, 12:57:11 PM
I'm surprised to see all the Richmond draftees in that list, especially considering that Vlastuin's the only one I think we'll see play this year.

Agreed.
McBean won't play games, but his fwd/ruck DPP may be handy for some coaches

My argument against that is you'll be going into the season with essentially a one man bench in either the forwards or rucks. It would be nice to have a DPP link but I'd rather pick someone I think is going to play and earn me money.
Or if your going to pick a fwd/ruck who isn't playing, pick a rookie who is a little cheaper.

Mr.Craig

I think I'd be more tempted to get the DPP later in the season. I got Roughead into my forwards during the year and then gained a bit of cash by turning Big O into Pattison. Don't think I ended up using Roughy in the rucks but the option was there anyway.

Just feels like too big of a risk but I'm happy to be proven wrong.

Holz

Quote from: Mr.Craig on December 07, 2012, 05:45:05 PM
Quote from: Holzman on December 07, 2012, 05:10:20 PM
Quote from: Mr.Craig on December 07, 2012, 04:08:30 PM
Quote from: underdog11 on December 07, 2012, 03:45:21 PM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on December 07, 2012, 06:25:34 AM
lack of love for Watson surprised me
I can not believe the amount of people starting with cotch!

Has increased his average by 6.7, 19.6 and 17 in the last 3 seasons. Averaged 119.1 post bye this year and he's a good bloke. My question would be, why would anyone NOT start with Cotch? 8)

because his average will drop next year :)

Oh okay, my mistake then. :-[

im in the small majority who doesnt have the faith in cotchin. If he peforms in the NAB i may change my tune though.

Bones Bombers

I think Cotchin, like Watson, has shown he can handle a tag and is he best player at the Tiges, who are an improving side.
Still not sure about Murphy as a super premo with copping the tag every week? He is a smaller player too.

Windigo

I don't think I'll be getting Cotchin at the start either.  :-\

nrich102

Quote from: JROO8 on December 07, 2012, 05:46:31 PM
Quote from: Mr.Craig on December 07, 2012, 01:13:12 PM
Quote from: NigeyS on December 07, 2012, 12:57:11 PM
I'm surprised to see all the Richmond draftees in that list, especially considering that Vlastuin's the only one I think we'll see play this year.

Agreed.
McBean won't play games, but his fwd/ruck DPP may be handy for some coaches
+1

elephants

Awesome research man!

Nice to see only 11.36% and 4.55% on my smokies ;)

Jroo

Quote from: elephants on December 07, 2012, 07:03:17 PM
Awesome research man!

Nice to see only 11.36% and 4.55% on my smokies ;)
Danny Stanley and Nat Fyfe?  :P

elephants


Adamant

Quote from: elephants on December 07, 2012, 07:19:52 PM
Quote from: JROO8 on December 07, 2012, 07:08:25 PM
Quote from: elephants on December 07, 2012, 07:03:17 PM
Awesome research man!

Nice to see only 11.36% and 4.55% on my smokies ;)
Danny Stanley and Nat Fyfe?  :P

flower hahah

They are great smokies, both in my Asians team 8)

Adamant

Surprised at the lack of love Mitch Robbo, also cant believe that Pendles isn't in 90% of teams.