Main Menu

Big Joe

Started by Bones Bombers, November 30, 2012, 06:15:14 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Mr.Craig

I'll still consider him. Can't think of any other forward rookie that averaged 97.2 in the TAC. 8)

quinny88

How can they make a decision like this on a player that hasn't played a game yet but plays as a ruck/fwd?
Was something said that he wouldn't play in the ruck or?

quinny88

Quote from: Mr.Craig on November 30, 2012, 10:41:22 PM
I'll still consider him. Can't think of any other forward rookie that averaged 97.2 in the TAC. 8)

He monstered 18 year olds though. He will be the one getting monstered now.
Where do you get all of your tac cup DT stats btw craig?

tbagrocks

Quote from: Mr.Craig on November 30, 2012, 10:41:22 PM
I'll still consider him. Can't think of any other forward rookie that averaged 97.2 in the TAC. 8)
Ben Kennedy didn't play Tac :P

Mr.Craig

Quote from: quinny88 on November 30, 2012, 10:42:16 PM
How can they make a decision like this on a player that hasn't played a game yet but plays as a ruck/fwd?
Was something said that he wouldn't play in the ruck or?

Judging by his stats he wasn't used as No.1 ruck much at all - his hitouts were 7, 8, 3, 11, 2, 0, 2, 3. Compare that to his goals - 3, 7, 2, 5, 2, 1, 1, 2.

Mind you, the Essendon website has his position listed as "Ruck", not even "Ruck/Forward" so that might give an insight into their thinking. :-\

Mr.Craig

Quote from: quinny88 on November 30, 2012, 10:44:10 PM
Quote from: Mr.Craig on November 30, 2012, 10:41:22 PM
I'll still consider him. Can't think of any other forward rookie that averaged 97.2 in the TAC. 8)

He monstered 18 year olds though. He will be the one getting monstered now.
Where do you get all of your tac cup DT stats btw craig?

Sportingpulse. ;)

quinny88

Quote from: Mr.Craig on November 30, 2012, 10:49:02 PM
Quote from: quinny88 on November 30, 2012, 10:42:16 PM
How can they make a decision like this on a player that hasn't played a game yet but plays as a ruck/fwd?
Was something said that he wouldn't play in the ruck or?

Judging by his stats he wasn't used as No.1 ruck much at all - his hitouts were 7, 8, 3, 11, 2, 0, 2, 3. Compare that to his goals - 3, 7, 2, 5, 2, 1, 1, 2.

Mind you, the Essendon website has his position listed as "Ruck", not even "Ruck/Forward" so that might give an insight into their thinking. :-\

Hmm maybe he just wasnt a very good ruckman? lol

quinny88

Quote from: Mr.Craig on November 30, 2012, 10:49:42 PM
Quote from: quinny88 on November 30, 2012, 10:44:10 PM
Quote from: Mr.Craig on November 30, 2012, 10:41:22 PM
I'll still consider him. Can't think of any other forward rookie that averaged 97.2 in the TAC. 8)

He monstered 18 year olds though. He will be the one getting monstered now.
Where do you get all of your tac cup DT stats btw craig?

Sportingpulse. ;)

Thanks mate

Mr.Craig

You still have to add up the numbers yourself but it's a handy resource. I've compiled all the DT scores in my rookie thread anyway to save people the trouble.

As for Joe's scoring, don't get me wrong I wouldn't expect anything beyond a low to mid 60's average but I might need to slot him in if the MN proves to be higher than expected.

quinny88

Quote from: Mr.Craig on November 30, 2012, 11:03:10 PM
You still have to add up the numbers yourself but it's a handy resource. I've compiled all the DT scores in my rookie thread anyway to save people the trouble.

As for Joe's scoring, don't get me wrong I wouldn't expect anything beyond a low to mid 60's average but I might need to slot him in if the MN proves to be higher than expected.

Yeah I saw that mate, very nice work.

The_Captain

Now that he is a foward only.. no chance !!