Permanent rolling lockout in 2013

[Football Factory]

Every one should sign this unless you have no life and spend your entire weekend looking at a computer screen.
Terrible rule brought in just makes it a completely unfair game

You just described my life :(

PMSL  ;D

[kilbluff1985]

So if 28 of your 30 play up to Sunday then your last two are starters and pull out, you cannot do anything about it right?

shower, good question... Got me thinking now.. Emergencies would solve that wouldnt they?

yes you would get the emergencies scores geez guys you acting like noobs

[KoopKicka]

Thanks guys, 65 in about 7 hours, not a bad start. I want some sort of life on the weekend. ::) It unevens the playing field ridiculously.

Cheers Quinny and Dudge.

[KoopKicka]

Thanks guys keep it up! Fairness for all!

[Adamant]

Posted it on DT Talk Koop ;)

[KoopKicka]

Posted it on DT Talk Koop ;)

Youre a legend Ada!

I did tweet them all about it, only Warnie has RTed so far. :)

[Mr.Craig]

Posted it on DT Talk Koop ;)

Youre a legend Ada!

I did tweet them all about it, only Warnie has RTed so far. :)

Dreamteam Guru retweeted me.

[KoopKicka]

Posted it on DT Talk Koop ;)

Youre a legend Ada!

I did tweet them all about it, only Warnie has RTed so far. :)

Dreamteam Guru retweeted me.

I now know who you are! I  never you were in AFL dreamers! :D


Your a legend Mr.Craig :)

[Nails]

I'm one of those who don't really have much weekend access but rolling lockout is a good thing.

Things like players pulling their hammy on Saturday before their Sunday game...

Instead of 10,000 teams getting burned maybe only 1,000 teams burned... It's a good thing IMO.

Can't see why the 1000 teams who have access to the net before all games on the weekend, should get an advantage on the other 9000 teams that have commitments and can't access the net. Just can't see you're point Nails. The only people who would support this ( in my way of thinking ) are coaches who feel they need a leg up, and don't like playing on a level playing feild. Can't see any other reason mate sorry, I just feel it's taking the skill out of the game, and giving some an unfair advantage

The way it is now...

Let's go back to 2011 when only like 2% (myself included had Jack Redden)

Now let's say that 2% of the competition (random number) means 200 people have him and let's say in DT there's 30,000 coaches.

If this rule doesn't come in then those 200 coaches are SEVERELY punished vs. the other 29,800 coaches and are given close to guaranteed losses.

vs. with a Rolling Lockout where 180 coaches manage to trade him out or bring on a better player (perhaps through DPP) to their emergency then only 20 coaches get burnt.


Like if the rule doesn't come in the unlucky coaches get burnt the most at least this way minimizes burning.

[nrich102]

Let them with No life rule!!!

[nrich102]

Let them with NO life RULE!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Dudge]

I'm one of those who don't really have much weekend access but rolling lockout is a good thing.

Things like players pulling their hammy on Saturday before their Sunday game...

Instead of 10,000 teams getting burned maybe only 1,000 teams burned... It's a good thing IMO.

Can't see why the 1000 teams who have access to the net before all games on the weekend, should get an advantage on the other 9000 teams that have commitments and can't access the net. Just can't see you're point Nails. The only people who would support this ( in my way of thinking ) are coaches who feel they need a leg up, and don't like playing on a level playing feild. Can't see any other reason mate sorry, I just feel it's taking the skill out of the game, and giving some an unfair advantage

The way it is now...

Let's go back to 2011 when only like 2% (myself included had Jack Redden)

Now let's say that 2% of the competition (random number) means 200 people have him and let's say in DT there's 30,000 coaches.

If this rule doesn't come in then those 200 coaches are SEVERELY punished vs. the other 29,800 coaches and are given close to guaranteed losses.

vs. with a Rolling Lockout where 180 coaches manage to trade him out or bring on a better player (perhaps through DPP) to their emergency then only 20 coaches get burnt.


Like if the rule doesn't come in the unlucky coaches get burnt the most at least this way minimizes burning.

Nails you just help my point of view. So you and another 200 hundred people had J.Redden, unfortunately for u and 2oo hundred people got burn't. But say next week ,me and 29,800 people had Rockliff and u 200 hundred coaches di'd'nt, we all suffer SEVERLY as well. ( if rocky's a late out ) . Equal playing feild, But those who have time to be in front of the net , will surely have an advantage, thats all i'm saying. iF this rule stays the same as it was, were all  in the same boat, rather than those who sit in front of the net all weekend, having luxury cruisers, and the rest have to row

[strikes91]

is there a place where you can email them ? this surely can't happen

[Dudge]

is there a place where you can email them ? this surely can't happen

Yeah page 1 of this post mate- as nike would say - just do it  :)

[quinny88]

Like and share this, lets make this massive so they cant ignore it!

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Get-rid-of-the-new-rolling-lockout-SCDT-rule/411888705549199