Ruck/Fwd DPP 2013

[Barra17]

Champion Data have said that Cox spent 50% Fwd and 50% Ruck. That would mean that Nic Nat is the same. So in theory if one gets DPP status, so should the other. Would be a pretty devastating link...

[Grazz]

Champion Data have said that Cox spent 50% Fwd and 50% Ruck. That would mean that Nic Nat is the same. So in theory if one gets DPP status, so should the other. Would be a pretty devastating link...

Would be an awesome link Bara, DPP's will be worth their weight in Gold in 2013 this combo would be Platinum. :P

[Scrads]

Honestly wouldn't pick Cox if he was R/F, but would pick NicNat if he was in a heartbeat.

This is why I am an average DT'er hahaha.

[Grazz]

Honestly wouldn't pick Cox if he was R/F, but would pick NicNat if he was in a heartbeat.

This is why I am an average DT'er hahaha.

In DT id have Cox in a heartbeat mate if DPP, and play him up forward.

[owenbond007]

Honestly wouldn't pick Cox if he was R/F, but would pick NicNat if he was in a heartbeat.

This is why I am an average DT'er hahaha.

In DT id have Cox in a heartbeat mate if DPP, and play him up forward.

Id have both wouldnt start with either though and would play em both forward too. lol.

[Scrads]

Honestly wouldn't pick Cox if he was R/F, but would pick NicNat if he was in a heartbeat.

This is why I am an average DT'er hahaha.

In DT id have Cox in a heartbeat mate if DPP, and play him up forward.

Do you think the new ruck rules give NicNat an advantage over a lot of other rucks, making him (dare I say it) a better Ruck option at WC than Cox ?

[Grazz]

Honestly wouldn't pick Cox if he was R/F, but would pick NicNat if he was in a heartbeat.

This is why I am an average DT'er hahaha.

In DT id have Cox in a heartbeat mate if DPP, and play him up forward.

Do you think the new ruck rules give NicNat an advantage over a lot of other rucks, making him (dare I say it) a better Ruck option at WC than Cox ?

With his verticle leap yeh absolutely, still think Cox can score well enough to hold down a fwd roll in my team and if given DPP makes him a handy player, my only concern with Nic Nat is the groin surgery limiting his pre season, i kinda like the guys i pick to have uninterupted pre seasons but tbh you cant always have your cake and eat it to when picking a fantasy team. Roughy isnt out of the equation either.

[LF]

Honestly wouldn't pick Cox if he was R/F, but would pick NicNat if he was in a heartbeat.

This is why I am an average DT'er hahaha.

In DT id have Cox in a heartbeat mate if DPP, and play him up forward.

Do you think the new ruck rules give NicNat an advantage over a lot of other rucks, making him (dare I say it) a better Ruck option at WC than Cox ?

With his verticle leap yeh absolutely, still think Cox can score well enough to hold down a fwd roll in my team and if given DPP makes him a handy player, my only concern with Nic Nat is the groin surgery limiting his pre season, i kinda like the guys i pick to have uninterupted pre seasons but tbh you cant always have your cake and eat it to when picking a fantasy team. Roughy isnt out of the equation either.

Yeah no preseason is a slight turn off but I just think back to the start of the year when I almost decided to not start with Deledio for this reason and upgrade to him instead.

[Grazz]

Yep thought the same LF glad i didn't follow me own rule with that one, would of been a huge error. I'll be reading and gleaning as much info as possible with nic nat between now and Nab so hopefully its all good.

[Adamant]

I cant see why Cox would be such a lock for everyone if R/F DPP? Wouldn't Roughead still be a better option?

[Grazz]

I cant see why Cox would be such a lock for everyone if R/F DPP? Wouldn't Roughead still be a better option?

Roughy isnt out of the equation at all, it will have a lot to do with how i set up for the byes and how many of one team i have
in the side tbh.