2013 Player Profile: Arryn Siposs

Holz · February 11, 2013, 01:38:41 PM

Quote from: Windigo on February 11, 2013, 01:31:10 PM
But then you have Varcoe, knights ect who are all cheaper. ???

siposs could easily outscore them.

Varcoe never been a great DT player, KNights im not convinvced with.

Saying that I have byrnes. If i can see Siposs going 85 he will make my squad though.

Scrads · February 11, 2013, 03:50:28 PM

Cox + Terlich or Siposs + Pederson ?

Holz · February 11, 2013, 04:01:06 PM

Quote from: Scrads on February 11, 2013, 03:50:28 PM
Cox + Terlich or Siposs + Pederson ?

Cox and terlich be a mile.

wouldnt go anywhere near pedo bear.

Scrads · February 11, 2013, 04:03:25 PM

Quote from: Holzman on February 11, 2013, 04:01:06 PM
Quote from: Scrads on February 11, 2013, 03:50:28 PM
Cox + Terlich or Siposs + Pederson ?

Cox and terlich be a mile.

wouldnt go anywhere near pedo bear.

Why not ?

Jroo · February 11, 2013, 04:03:45 PM

Quote from: Holzman on February 11, 2013, 04:01:06 PM
Quote from: Scrads on February 11, 2013, 03:50:28 PM
Cox + Terlich or Siposs + Pederson ?

Cox and terlich be a mile.

wouldnt go anywhere near pedo bear.

+1 Cox and Terlich for me too.
Why Holz, won't you go near Pedersen?
I'm considering starting with him.

Jukes · February 11, 2013, 04:11:15 PM

Quote from: Scrads on February 11, 2013, 03:50:28 PM
Cox + Terlich or Siposs + Pederson ?

Cox 95 + Terlich 68
vs
Siposs 87 + Pedo 75

163 vs 162

Cox and Terlich...just...

Holz · February 11, 2013, 04:13:03 PM

Quote from: JROO8 on February 11, 2013, 04:03:45 PM
Quote from: Holzman on February 11, 2013, 04:01:06 PM
Quote from: Scrads on February 11, 2013, 03:50:28 PM
Cox + Terlich or Siposs + Pederson ?

Cox and terlich be a mile.

wouldnt go anywhere near pedo bear.
+1 Cox and Terlich for me too.
Why Holz, won't you go near Pedersen?
I'm considering starting with him.

because he is 300k. I feel much safer paying an extra 100k for either goldy in the rucks or broughton/hartlett down back .

he has the potential to be a bit KPP.

Scrads · February 11, 2013, 04:13:59 PM

How about this then guys:

Breust + sub 115k rookie (Tom Mitchell)

or

Siposs + Wines

Scrads · February 11, 2013, 04:14:52 PM

Quote from: Holzman on February 11, 2013, 04:13:03 PM
Quote from: JROO8 on February 11, 2013, 04:03:45 PM
Quote from: Holzman on February 11, 2013, 04:01:06 PM
Quote from: Scrads on February 11, 2013, 03:50:28 PM
Cox + Terlich or Siposs + Pederson ?

Cox and terlich be a mile.

wouldnt go anywhere near pedo bear.
+1 Cox and Terlich for me too.
Why Holz, won't you go near Pedersen?
I'm considering starting with him.

because he is 300k. I feel much safer paying an extra 100k for either goldy in the rucks or broughton/hartlett down back .

he has the potential to be a bit KPP.

His VFL average last year was like 96 or something though, even if he averaged 80 it would be good for the backline.

Jukes · February 11, 2013, 04:15:38 PM

Quote from: Scrads on February 11, 2013, 04:13:59 PM
How about this then guys:

Breust + sub 115k rookie (Tom Mitchell)

or

Siposs + Wines

Breust 88 + Mitchell 75
vs
Siposs 87 + Wines 80

Sip and Wines wins, would and am going with that combination.

Andrew · February 13, 2013, 04:44:03 AM

Quote from: Jukes on February 11, 2013, 04:15:38 PM
Quote from: Scrads on February 11, 2013, 04:13:59 PM
How about this then guys:

Breust + sub 115k rookie (Tom Mitchell)

or

Siposs + Wines

Breust 88 + Mitchell 75
vs
Siposs 87 + Wines 80

Sip and Wines wins, would and am going with that combination.

+1. With the early trade of Sipposs once he's peaked... unless he really breaks out this year.

Holz · February 13, 2013, 11:38:03 AM

Quote from: Scrads on February 11, 2013, 04:13:59 PM
How about this then guys:

Breust + sub 115k rookie (Tom Mitchell)

or

Siposs + Wines

thats a hard choice as i wouldnt go siposs or breust.

siposs and wines wins purley becasue of wines.

Ricochet · February 13, 2013, 12:13:55 PM

Quote from: Holzman on February 13, 2013, 11:38:03 AM
Quote from: Scrads on February 11, 2013, 04:13:59 PM
How about this then guys:

Breust + sub 115k rookie (Tom Mitchell)

or

Siposs + Wines

thats a hard choice as i wouldnt go siposs or breust.

siposs and wines wins purley becasue of wines.

yep agree with Holz here

PowerBug · February 17, 2013, 11:51:16 PM

BUMP

Just scrollin through the P&T 2012 board after doing a search on "Sam Blease" and i got to this thread:
http://www.fanfooty.com.au/forum/index.php/topic,66971.0.html

Look at who's listed as St.Kilda's "bolter" in 2013! o.O This is written in August too.

Andrew · March 20, 2013, 12:48:48 AM

Do people think this guy is worth starting? I've got him at F4 still, but he didn't set the World on fire in the NAB Cup. Probably my shakiest pick along with R2 (which is a given for most I would think...).