Re: WXV Trade Confirmation Thread & Final Draft Order

[My Chumps]

It was a joke Nails you flog.

People are going to block your trade because they see it as unfair, whether you do or not, it doesn't matter.


Stop being a whiny douche about it  ::)

[CrowsFan]

CairoSands: may block the trade just for that comment

Coaches can neg trades just on personal feelings or disliking a coach, or fear that one team may become suddenly better than theirs. This voting system might need a re-think.

Never said I disliked you Nails.

Might just block the trade for that comment. :P

Context.

What comment?

[My Chumps]

CairoSands: may block the trade just for that comment

Coaches can neg trades just on personal feelings or disliking a coach, or fear that one team may become suddenly better than theirs. This voting system might need a re-think.

Never said I disliked you Nails.

Might just block the trade for that comment. :P

Context.

What comment?

Nails comment on chat was:

Nails: Ebert = Swan 2.0

ML then said: may block the trade just for that comment

As a joke... and Nails posted it on here  ::)

[c4v3m4n]

CairoSands: may block the trade just for that comment

Coaches can neg trades just on personal feelings or disliking a coach, or fear that one team may become suddenly better than theirs. This voting system might need a re-think.

Never said I disliked you Nails.

Might just block the trade for that comment. :P

Context.

What comment?

Nails comment on chat was:

Nails: Ebert = Swan 2.0

ML then said: may block the trade just for that comment

As a joke... and Nails posted it on here  ::)

Exactly.

That is all that comment was. Everyone knew it and reacting like this Nails wasn't right.

[MajorLazer]

Can't believe people take me seriously at all. :P

I understand sarcasm isn't conveyed very well over the internet, but still.

[Nails]

I always knew it was a joke, but that's not the point.

My point is in this system, you only need a couple butthurt/insulted managers to neg your vote along w/ a few other managers who disagree and your trade is screwed.

The fact that one comment has the POTENTIAL to cause a couple to neg a trade = a weakness in the system - IMO.

[MajorLazer]

I always knew it was a joke, but that's not the point.

My point is in this system, you only need a couple butthurt/insulted managers to neg your vote along w/ a few other managers who disagree and your trade is screwed.

The fact that one comment has the POTENTIAL to cause a couple to neg a trade = a weakness in the system - IMO.

I'm fairly sure you need to post a reason why you are voting against a trade and if Os deems the reason unacceptable or he sees the exact same reason over and over, I'm sure he would intervene.

[ossie85]

Once a trade has been confirmed, do you guys think a the trade can be cancelled prior to voting? I only think this should be able to done if both parties agree....

thoughts?

[CrowsFan]

Yeah if both teams agree to cancel the trade that sounds fine. But can't be one team wanting to cancel cos they have found a "better" deal

[Ringo]

I think if a trade is to be cancelled after it has been confirmed then all parties should agree to cancell the trade. This fair.

Why should a trade be able to be cancelled by one party.  eg If I have confirmed a trade but have second thoughts unless we have this safeguard in place I could just cancel the trade. Not right imo.

[MajorLazer]

Yep, definitely agree with the above posts.

If you have second thoughts, bring them up before you confirm the trade.

[Purple 77]

Yep, definitely agree with the above posts.

If you have second thoughts, bring them up before you confirm the trade.

You could formally agree to an escape clause between teams?

[Torpedo10]

CF is in for a nervous wait. a broken toe would be 1-6 weeks. an achilles would be 2013 bye bye.  :'(

[CrowsFan]

CF is in for a nervous wait. a broken toe would be 1-6 weeks. an achilles would be 2013 bye bye.  :'(

:-\

[Boomz]

Yeah I agree should be able to be cancelled if both parties agree.