Main Menu

Saints give up Pick 12 for Lee

Started by Ricochet, October 08, 2012, 04:39:31 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Ricochet

http://www.sportsnewsfirst.com.au/articles/2012/10/08/lee-s-afl-dream-reignited-at-st-kilda/

ANOTHER West Australian young gun has been snapped up on the first day of AFL trade week, with Tom Lee being secured by St Kilda.

Lee has been on an AFL list before, spending the 2009 season with Port Adelaide before being cut without playing a game.

Returning to WA, but not giving up his ambition, Lee has since become a WAFL goal machine, kicking 39 goals in 15 games for the Tigers this year and producing a best afield performance in Foxtel Cup Grand Final against Werribee.

Under the AFL trade rules, Lee was pre-listed by the GWS Giants, who on traded the 21-year-old to the Saints.

The Saints have agreed to a deal involving its pick 12 to be traded to GWS Giants in exchange for Tom Lee, pick 24 and pick 43.

Cicjose


FisherSaints

He is a 195cm forward, I think it's a good deal

Ricochet

So do i, he's a gun in the WAFL
Hopefully he makes the most of his second chance

Justin Bieber

They didn't get Lee for pick 12. They also got pick 24 and pick 43...

Cicjose

they traded their number 1 pick (which values him at 12) to get him and 2 more draft picks

tbagrocks

Again a team full of teanagers trades an older player to get... another teenager, seriously AFL take the licences off these two hack usless clubs that simply don't know how to build a competitive list (says the coach of the Llamas  ::))

Holz

I have watched lee in the WAFL and rate him highly, take a really good contested mark and looks a level above the competition which is what you expect from a AFL player. Good move by them i think.

Scrads

Quote from: Cicjose on October 08, 2012, 06:34:54 PM
they traded their number 1 pick (which values him at 12) to get him and 2 more draft picks

So the 2 other picks are just freebies ?

If I traded you Player X + Pick 8 for Pick 7 does that maker Player X worth Pick 7 then ?

Spinking

Not too unhappy about this. Just hope they will play him ahead of Kosi. Gotta get the kids playing!

Cicjose

Quote from: Scrads on October 11, 2012, 06:41:41 PM
Quote from: Cicjose on October 08, 2012, 06:34:54 PM
they traded their number 1 pick (which values him at 12) to get him and 2 more draft picks

So the 2 other picks are just freebies ?

If I traded you Player X + Pick 8 for Pick 7 does that maker Player X worth Pick 7 then ?

yeah it does because why else would you trade such a high pick for?

Ziplock

no...

think of it like an equation, for both parties to be happy, the trade would be equal

So player X + pick 8= pick 7

So, playerX= pick7- pick8

which means basically, X= the difference between pick 7 and 8, which isn't extremely high...

Scrads

Quote from: Cicjose on October 11, 2012, 09:13:23 PM
Quote from: Scrads on October 11, 2012, 06:41:41 PM
Quote from: Cicjose on October 08, 2012, 06:34:54 PM
they traded their number 1 pick (which values him at 12) to get him and 2 more draft picks

So the 2 other picks are just freebies ?

If I traded you Player X + Pick 8 for Pick 7 does that maker Player X worth Pick 7 then ?

yeah it does because why else would you trade such a high pick for?

Are you trolling...?

Player X + Pick 8

for

Pick 7

Player X is therefore = Pick 7 ? Do not think so.