having hille and ottens a bad idea?

[tyram23]

just wondering if anyone knows how well hille and ottens are coming along with their injuries? would it be the worst choice ever to have them both as my starting rucks? it is tempting given their prices?
thanks
also is waite screwed with his injury too? or is he meant to be all good now? thanks

[Justin Bieber]

all recovering pretty well. hille and waite still a 50/50 chance to play round 1. not sure bout ottens.

[cuz_crew]

worst possible ruck combo...

both injury prone and a big risk... who knows how well they will come back after a season long injury?

its tempting to go for them because they are cheap and good but dont fall for it.

natanui is a good choice as is kreuzer, hmac, jolly

[tyram23]

i have gone with hille and naitunui atm.. but if hille looks shower ill downgrade j brown in forwards to jack ziebell, and change hille to jolly or something...??

[Justin Bieber]

don't upgrade to jolly if you need to. last year was up and down. played well with sydney's game plan but don't think he can do the same this year at the pies.

maybe to kreuz, hmac or sandi even.

[ulahoopski]

Way too risky! Why would you take such a risk with the least important positions in DT? For an extra 20000 you could pick Seaby and Gardiner for less risk.

[BU1101]

Gardiner is a dead end, id rather have almost anyone. dont pick him. Hille and ottens have upside, as does Nicnat, get all three, means you are covered for early form or injury and you will be able to settle on 2 mid season and make huge profit. All at the cost of a decent ruck combo. ~700,000. Wow... I have almost convinced myself.

[tyram23]

yeh hille and naitunui are my rucks atm.... thinking of downgrading a midfielder to beau waters and then changing hille to sanderlands though?

[tyram23]

i mean downgrading a defender such as rhyce shaw to beau waters then i can change hille to sanderlands?