Sportal A-League Fantasy

[Chelskiman]

Yeah, for what I paid for him and his output so far this season I have not been impressed.  I'm also 57th overall, so his current form has made me drop a few places over the last week or so, which is why it's a tough decision.  Do I keep him and hope he hits form or bail on him and get a player who is already in form?

[shaker]

What I hate is when you trade someone for a player that has been rippin it up and for them to have a dog , tough decision I think I will keep him . You might have to flip a coin .

[northernstar]

Yeah, for what I paid for him and his output so far this season I have not been impressed.  I'm also 57th overall, so his current form has made me drop a few places over the last week or so, which is why it's a tough decision.  Do I keep him and hope he hits form or bail on him and get a player who is already in form?

Funny thing for me is that Broich and Berisha where my trade in targets a few weeks ago. Now I don't seem to want any piece of that Brisbane outfit.

I'm personally Keeping Broich in FoxFantasy.

[Chelskiman]

Hmm.  Who is the best option out of these guys?

Rogic
McGlinchey
Miller
Finkler

[EZA100]

mcGlinchey if you dont care about the money but if you want some spare cash then go for rogic. Should i keep topor-stanley or get rid of him for either sainsbury, zwaanswijk, heffernan or spend all my money and get bojic.

[Chelskiman]

Sainsbury is looking great right now.  Zwaanswijk relies too much on goals for him to be worth his current price.  You can't go wrong with any CCM defender though.

Thinking I may go for Rogic over McGlinchey if I trade.  Such a hard decision because I know how good Broich is and I just know as soon as I trade him he'll have a blinder.

[shaker]

Time is running mate you are going to make a decision.

[EZA100]

still cant decide sainsbury, zwannswijk or bojic?

[Chelskiman]

Sainsbury if you want to keep some spare cash, otherwise I'd be going Bojic.

[Chelskiman]

flower

Yep, it's obvious which way I went.  ::)

[Chelskiman]

still cant decide sainsbury, zwannswijk or bojic?

Hope for your sake you didn't go Zwannswijk as he just got sent off.

[Chelskiman]

How do subs work in this?  I play with three forwards but Archie was a very late out last night so there was no way I could trade him out even if I wanted to as it was a Saturday game, so does that mean I get no sub or will one of my defenders or mids be subbed in?

[shaker]

I have him to with three forwards = a big fat zero

[Chelskiman]

That's stupid. >>  If you play with three forwards, which is quite logical, it means you run the risk of not having a sub.  I guess you could say the same with playing 5 in the mids or back, but still.  Should be able to either pick 6 defenders, 6 mids and 4 forwards so you have cover no matter what formation you play or if you play with a full line and a player is a late out a player from one of your other lines comes in to cover.  I was going so well too. :(

[shaker]

The only way around it is 4-4-2 formation to have a sub in every area , but who wants to have 4 defenders every time look at some of the scores this round with the defenders .