AXVs: Official Trades

[monstrum]

Poor bloke CW  :-\

[Colliwobblers]

Trade between the Manila Folders and the UAE Tigers.

Folders give: NAT draft pick 12

Tigers give: Nathan Foley

Reasoning: As much as I would love to keep my first round draft pick, I am going for short term success and Nathan Foley will be a welcome addition to my midfield. Because of his age of injury concerns I feel he is worth about pick 12 with what he averages.

APPROVED.  pending trade alteration The folders do not have nat pick 12. They have nat pick 11.

Folders to confirm the pick number.

[BB67th]

Trade between the Manila Folders and the UAE Tigers.

Folders give: NAT draft pick 12

Tigers give: Nathan Foley

Reasoning: As much as I would love to keep my first round draft pick, I am going for short term success and Nathan Foley will be a welcome addition to my midfield. Because of his age of injury concerns I feel he is worth about pick 12 with what he averages.

APPROVED.  pending trade alteration The folders do not have nat pick 12. They have nat pick 11.

Folders to confirm the pick number.

Whoops my bad, thought it was pick 12. I approve it being pick 11 instead.

[Colliwobblers]

Trade between the UAE Tigers and the Kuala Lumpir Crocodiles
Tigers give: Mark LeCras + NAT pick 26
Crodoiles give: Jack Ziebell + Rookie pick 12

Reasoning: The Tigers need to strengthen there midfield while the Crocodiles are after another forward

Confirmed: We have loads of Mids but lack forward power. Lecras helps this. Pick swap bridges the gap between JZ and Lecras.

APPROVED.

[Colliwobblers]

Llamas give
Brad Ebert, Heppell, Nat picks 50, 55, Rookie round 1(7) round 6 (87)
Recieve
Wingard, Trengove, Nat pick 5, 31, 33 Rookie, round 1 (5)

Eskimos give
Wingard, Nat picks 6, 31
Recieve
Brad Ebert, Nat pick 55, Rookie round 1 (7)

Elephants give
Nat picks 17, 33
Recieve,
Nat 6, Rookie round 6 (87)

Headhunters give
Jack Trengove, Nat pick 5, Rookie round 1 (5)
Recieve
Heppell, Nat pick 17, 50

How's that CW I think that's right

DENIED - flower that too much effort to work out.  But serious response is always in color (below) and give me an hour to update the picks and player lists and post it all up on front page post.

APPROVED.

Think there are some clear winners or losers, but opinions aren't my job, the trade is not EXTREME UNEVEN and no team in it all gains a HUGE advantage over any other teams through the deal.  So it is all FINE :)

* JUST SO EVERYBODY UNDERSTANDS - YOU MAY ON TRADE A PLAYER YOU TRADED IN WITHOUT IT USING A LIST MOVEMENT.

* IT IS ACTUALLY A LIST MOVEMENT BUT NOT WHEN I REFER BACK TO PRE-TRADE LIST, THEN THE CHANGE IS ONLY 1 LIST MOVEMENT NO MATTER HOW MANY TIMES YOU TRADE DIFFERENT PLAYERS THROUGH THAT SAME POSITION ON YOUR LIST ( IF THAT MAKES SENSE)

* Example.

Original list...

1. swan
2. ablett.
3. picken
4. spud

trade #1 picken for heppell

= 1 list movement and new list

1. swan
2. ablett.
3. heppell
4. spud

trade #2 hepell for donkey

= 0 list movement and new list

1. swan
2. ablett.
3. donkey
4. spud

trade #3 donkey for pick #6

= 0 list movement and new list

1. swan
2. ablett.
3. 
4. spud

trade #4 pick 6 for cotchin

= 0 list movement and new list  VS original list

1.   swan           1. swan
2.   ablett.         2. ablett
3.  cotchin       3. picken
4.   spud            4. spud

BOLD is the only change (list movement) to your original list

[AFEV]

Check out my front page. It's awesome!

Laos Elephants

I got a little directory and everything :)

You know what's hilarious? 50 posts per page. Your 45 resserves only shows as one page for me. ;D

[monstrum]

lol nice 1 colli, thanks  8)

[Justin Bieber]

It needs to be noted that we changed rookie pick 87 to rookie pick 23. We made this change before the trade went through :)

[Nails]

me want 100+ defenders

trade me nowwwwwwwwwww

Message me if you have a defender who averaged 99+ we can work deals out :o

[Colliwobblers]

wonder if goddard will be considered a DEF next season, suppose he will have to be but time he will spend in the midfield for Essendon in 2013 = 96.273% at a rough estimate :)


OK Anyone who had PM a trade proposal to me feel free to post them in the thread, since the announcement i sent out there will be no complaining (much ) about trades and it will make it easier for me to find any outstanding trades :)

I will go through all my PM and check but just in case i miss one or ten maybe best to post here if you have one proposed waiting for approval.

[BB67th]

Goddard will be a defender again next season, don't you worry ;)

[Colliwobblers]

Goddard will be a defender again next season, don't you worry ;)

Yeah and just imagine what he will score playing mostly mid - I pencil him in for 110-115. avg (DT)

would have considered starting him again as he was at ST K but now he is a LOCK.

[Adamant]

Goddard will be a defender again next season, don't you worry ;)

Yeah and just imagine what he will score playing mostly mid - I pencil him in for 110-115. avg (DT)

would have considered starting him again as he was at ST K but now he is a LOCK.

He will take Lids' spot as the #1 DT/SC defender.

[KoopKicka]

Off the table:

Scott Pendlebery
Brad Ebert
Daniel Hannebery
Michael Hibberd
Cyril Rioli
Luke Dahlhaus
Paddy Ryder
Jarrad Redden

Would need an amazing offer:

David Ellard
Allen Christensen
Brian Lake
Anthony Morabito
Jarryd Blair
Jamie Cripps
Alan Didak

Up for discussion:

Everyone else:

[Torpedo10]

You are tight koop. Didak is a spud & so is Morabito.  :-X