2013 Player Profiles : Ryan O'Keefe

Started by DT-SC, September 16, 2012, 12:06:23 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Jroo

Does anyone think he will actually be DPP? If he is though he is a lock at that price.

Capper

Quote from: JROO8 on October 20, 2012, 11:30:37 AM
Does anyone think he will actually be DPP? If he is though he is a lock at that price.
a definite lock if he does get DPP. Didnt play much forward this year but played quite a bit back as the spare player

Shihan7

Doubt ROK will be DPP, but he would be a massive lock if he was.

chaosAD


nrich102


stew42

Quote from: tabs on October 20, 2012, 11:33:05 AM
Quote from: JROO8 on October 20, 2012, 11:30:37 AM
Does anyone think he will actually be DPP? If he is though he is a lock at that price.
a definite lock if he does get DPP. Didnt play much forward this year but played quite a bit back as the spare player
I'm calling TPP - Triple Position Player!

Adamant

Quote from: stew42 on November 03, 2012, 12:51:34 PM
Quote from: tabs on October 20, 2012, 11:33:05 AM
Quote from: JROO8 on October 20, 2012, 11:30:37 AM
Does anyone think he will actually be DPP? If he is though he is a lock at that price.
a definite lock if he does get DPP. Didnt play much forward this year but played quite a bit back as the spare player
I'm calling TPP - Triple Position Player!

lol we can only hope!


Capper

2013 Dream picker price $499,300 but is now only a mid

stew42

Really tempted to take a punt here... but he'd have to replace Pendles or Cotch...

essendon2

averaged 110 excluding his first few games (where he was coming back from surgery)

kilbluff1985


me

who are the better guys? seems to me he represents pretty good value age aside although i dont see him slowing down this year ---- im actually starting to think this guy could make a great stepping stone to swanny, could easily hammer out some monster scores early on gws/gcs and is an absolute jet - absolutely monstered the finals series last year

Capper

especially with the new DT rule of 2 trades per week and the fact the Swans play GWS and GC in the first 2 rounds i would be looking at ROK

but i am biased

henry

Quote from: tabs on January 17, 2013, 08:36:00 PM
especially with the new DT rule of 2 trades per week and the fact the Swans play GWS and GC in the first 2 rounds i would be looking at ROK

but i am biased
Hadn't actually seen the swans draw was so soft in the first 2 rounds, certainly allows for the possibility of starting with more swans players. He averages 114 and 125 against those teams but then only 75 against north. Therefore round 3 would be a good round to trade him out. A good player you could start with him instead of is Cotchin, whose first two games are against NM and the saints, who he only averages 96 and 87 against in the last 2 years. His draw opens up after that though, with the Bulldogs (152 last year) Collingwood (no tagger) and Fremantle (3 hundreds last 3 games, crowley usually goes to lids) in the next 3 weeks. Therefore a seemingly very viable option is to start O'keefe and then sideways to Cotchin after round 2 or even 4, if the BEs suggest you will make more cash.