2013 Player Profiles: Pearce Hanley

[Ricochet]

MR consistent.. Just 5 short of an average of what yad want back there..

:o :o :o

I would say he is Mr Inconsistent...

120, 58, 71, 102, 63, 80, 52, 118, 96, 69, 34, 134, 120, 119, 64, 87, 43, 35, 73, 94, 72, 109

High of 134, low of 35...10 scores under 69 :-\

Yeh not something you want really, unless your going for overall. But even then...

[Shihan7]

MR consistent.. Just 5 short of an average of what yad want back there..

:o :o :o

I would say he is Mr Inconsistent...

120, 58, 71, 102, 63, 80, 52, 118, 96, 69, 34, 134, 120, 119, 64, 87, 43, 35, 73, 94, 72, 109

High of 134, low of 35...10 scores under 69 :-\

+1
Can smash out the 130's, but can also pull out a sub-70 :-\

[Sweetness]

How about this:
Brisbane have one of the best starting draws next year.
I'll list the first six teams they play next year, along with Hanley's corresponding score vs that opponent in 2012.

Bulldogs          134, 109
Adelaide          94
Gold Coast      102, 87
North Melb       96
Melbourne       120, 120
Sydney           119

Average = 109.0     8)

Perhaps a great POD for the beginning of the year, and reassess whether to keep him over the byes...

[Mr.Craig]

How about this:
Brisbane have one of the best starting draws next year.
I'll list the first six teams they play next year, along with Hanley's corresponding score vs that opponent in 2012.

Bulldogs          134, 109
Adelaide          94
Gold Coast      102, 87
North Melb       96
Melbourne       120, 120
Sydney           119

Average = 109.0     8)

Perhaps a great POD for the beginning of the year, and reassess whether to keep him over the byes...

Hmmm, the plot thickens.

[Toga]

thought he'd definitely be in my team come round 1, but have gone off him a bit. this makes him very enticing though!

[Barra17]

Damn you sweetness. I didn't want him. Now I'm thinking.

[Sweetness]

Damn you sweetness. I didn't want him. Now I'm thinking.

Haha I know the feeling.
Gibbs, Goddard, Grimes, Birchall, Heppell, Duffman and now Broughton, Hartlett and Hanley.
Will be fun picking which ones to start  :P

[Adamant]

Damn you sweetness. I didn't want him. Now I'm thinking.

Haha I know the feeling.
Gibbs, Goddard, Grimes, Birchall, Heppell and now Broughton, Hartlett and Hanley.
Will be fun picking which ones to start  :P

Dont forget Duffman!

[Sweetness]

Dont forget Duffman!

Haha In all honesty, I actually come back on to edit that post, because I realized I'd left him out  :D

[Jroo]

Damn you sweetness. I didn't want him. Now I'm thinking.

Haha I know the feeling.
Gibbs, Goddard, Grimes, Birchall, Heppell, Duffman and now Broughton, Hartlett and Hanley.
Will be fun picking which ones to start  :P

Like all of Broughton, Hartlett and Hanley. Will probably fit 1 or maximum 2 in my team.

[LF]

I'm locking him in he improved on his average this year from last year and I reckon he can only get better as long as Vossy doesn't do a Rockliff with him as plays him in the position that suits him.

[Heppell21]

Extremely consistent just doesn't have a high ceiling  8)

[Shihan7]

Extremely consistent just doesn't have a high ceiling  8)

Hahaha ::)

[LF]

Extremely consistent just doesn't have a high ceiling  8)

Hahaha ::)

Yeah consistently annoying more like it

[Hagebear]

It's Hanley v Hartlett for me. Inconsistency v durability?? Leaning towards Harts.