Guide to DT Prices 2013

Started by DT Gun, September 05, 2012, 01:27:38 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

tbagrocks

Quote from: whatlez on September 06, 2012, 12:15:38 AM
Well at the start of the year if you averaged 80 from 2011, you would cost 400k on the dot.

Averaging 100 costed 500k on the dot

True story.
pretty much how I saw this year Lez

jabroni

everyone in the top 10 has swan and ablett - go to captains every week  8)

Scrads

Caaaaaant wait for Fanplanner 2013, looking forward to seeing all these gun teams we will all make ;)

Grazz

Nice work DT, seeing Swans and Gaj's price there has me scratching my head as to how i'll get them in and still build a competative side early without having the luxury of a GWS starting up for quality cheap rookies.
Burger does look oh so cheap i think he'll be an exception to the mathematics, hope not but his price does look  :o

lachie_001

id have to go just ablett, swan would have to drop in price somewhere through the season with that price. Plenty of other mids below 500 to cash in on

Shihan7


Jukes

Bit of a spud thread hahaha

Yeah cheers to one of two people to have a better boo/cheer ratio then me :P (Other is Jormaspud)

Jukes

When will people learn? He's the best fantasy of all time, of course you have to get him! For the last 3-4 season people have gone on about not getting him until he drops in price and they miss out on massive scores, like 187, 171, 172, 165, 159...the list goes on. You cannot afford to not have him when your Murphy, Selwood etc gets a 90 while the Pig gets 180 as your opponents captain.

Ricochet

Quote from: Jukes on September 06, 2012, 12:07:32 PM
When will people learn? He's the best fantasy of all time, of course you have to get him! For the last 3-4 season people have gone on about not getting him until he drops in price and they miss out on massive scores, like 187, 171, 172, 165, 159...the list goes on. You cannot afford to not have him when your Murphy, Selwood etc gets a 90 while the Pig gets 180 as your opponents captain.
this
i waited and missed out this year, won't happen again

Tyes

Agreed, you have to start with either one of Ablett or Swan in my opinion. Especially if you are going for overall. Swan is first picked for me next year, unless something happens to him over the pre-season.

DT Gun

Imagine a midfield of
Swan, Pendles, beams, ball next year  we all know pies dominate the midfield even when they lose


Tyes

Quote from: DT Gun on September 06, 2012, 01:18:07 PM
Imagine a midfield of
Swan, Pendles, beams, ball next year  we all know pies dominate the midfield even when they lose

Imagine the bye round  :o haha

Grazz

Ball at that price could be the key to getting Gaj and Swan straight up if you start with him then Pendles after the bye.

DT Gun

Quote from: Tyes on September 06, 2012, 03:45:20 PM
Quote from: DT Gun on September 06, 2012, 01:18:07 PM
Imagine a midfield of
Swan, Pendles, beams, ball next year  we all know pies dominate the midfield even when they lose

Imagine the bye round  :o haha

Every player misses 1 game during the bye round. I'd rather have those 3 pumping massive scores than try patch a midfield for byes like we all did this year

For 1 round you'd be up shower creek but the next 2 you can get the points back!

Grazz

Quote from: DT Gun on September 06, 2012, 04:12:05 PM
Quote from: Tyes on September 06, 2012, 03:45:20 PM
Quote from: DT Gun on September 06, 2012, 01:18:07 PM
Imagine a midfield of
Swan, Pendles, beams, ball next year  we all know pies dominate the midfield even when they lose

Imagine the bye round  :o haha

Every player misses 1 game during the bye round. I'd rather have those 3 pumping massive scores than try patch a midfield for byes like we all did this year

For 1 round you'd be up shower creek but the next 2 you can get the points back!

This is true, i regreted not starting Pendles as well this year, panicked a bit over the byes to much. Dudge feels the same. I set up this year for round 13 to be my worst week and try to do well in the other two as alot would of considering the Backs that were missing. I'll go that way again in 2013 for sure its less complicated. :-\