Fanplanner 2013

[Matty411]

m0nty if you read this - it'd be good if you could consider this for implementation.

Firstly cheers for the early fanplanner - awesome work!

I just can't help but notice that there's a lot of discuss on the forums about the strong likeliness of the Magic Number being well out from what it's likely to be released at once DT opens... I notice the Salary Cap has been aptly increased but it's not in line with what the MN will likely be.

I know we won't know what it'll be until the Team Picker is released mid-December but maybe we could update it to be a bit closer to what it'll likely be? That way coaches can at least start to concoct realistic teams instead of seeing ones with ridiculously stacked teams ala this time last year - only to be completely hacked to pieces when the true MN was annouced.

May I suggest an updated MN to around 5000-5100 to be more realistic? I think this would benefit everyone at this stage...

Cheers

[POK252]

Good idea, ATM Im leaving 800-900k in the bank which is about right I reckon

[Mr.Craig]

Good idea, ATM Im leaving 800-900k in the bank which is about right I reckon

I think that's a bit conservative. I'm hoping it will be more in the region of 500k.

[Matty411]

A magic number of 5000 would mean you'd need roughly $550-600k remaining to fit under the new cap

[JBs-Hawks]

Probably post in the feedback section if you want monty to notice this

[m0nty]

I have updated the MN to a more realistic 5145. Sorry about the mix up.

[Matty411]

Cheers M0nty - much more realistic. Many thanks.

[elephants]

Hey m0nty, love your work! It seems you have 'blocked' my personal message so I'll just chuck it here :)

G'day mate,

There has been a lot of talk about Carrazzo losing his dpp next year.

1) do you have any inside info from champion data about this
2) what do you think he will be

I wasn't sure he could have played enough games to go into an exclusive midfielder...?

Appreciate your thoughts!

[Ziplock]

le, 14 games is easily enough of an assessment, and you don't really need inside info if you watch most the games... that being sia,d I only saw one or two carlton games, but both of them carrazzo seemed to be almost purely a mid.

[elephants]

le, 14 games is easily enough of an assessment, and you don't really need inside info if you watch most the games... that being sia,d I only saw one or two carlton games, but both of them carrazzo seemed to be almost purely a mid.

I mean like inside info from Champion Data or something because thats who makes the possies up. He might knwo through his fanplanner work and that.

[Justin Bieber]

If you tag all the top midfielders like Ablett, etc, how can you not be considered a pure midfielder.

We might as well quit player any fantasy games if Carrazzo is a defender next year.

[elephants]

If you tag all the top midfielders like Ablett, etc, how can you not be considered a pure midfielder.

We might as well quit player any fantasy games if Carrazzo is a defender next year.

Well why hasn't he been a mid only for the last few years ?

[Master Q]

In 2010/11 he often played as a Half Back... That's where he plays when he isn't tagging...

[m0nty]

I don't have any inside knowledge, no.

As has been noted many times before, classification relies mostly on where you get your possessions on the field. I don't quite know how Carrazzo has survived as a back this long either.

[Ziplock]

maybe cause the blues sucked for so long the ball was always in their back half ? :P