AXVs: Official Discussion Thread

[tbagrocks]

wrong :P

Ebert went 134 ave in his first year as a starting midfielder

Kelly went 125+ and is 28

[Justin Bieber]

I think when my team got judged, they left out Whitfield ;)

[JBs-Hawks]

got a better midfield than Dangerfield, Ebert, Kelly and Wallis? doubt it!

Need 6 strong mids FYI ;)

[Noz]

Watson, Boyd, Sewell, Ball just my starting 4 mids beats your whole team tbag

[Justin Bieber]

I'll tank hardout next year, so I can get first pick next year and then win the flag ;)

Fun fact: I have 3 number one picks. (In the last 5 years)

Not sure if anyone can top that.

[Jay]

stoked to be in KK's top 8 considering the youth of my team and pick 3 in the NAT draft :)

[Colliwobblers]

Official Trade thread is up, feel free to discuss all things trade there. Trade window will open and run for 2 weeks immediately following the conclusion of the initial draft.

[picker_man]

Murphy - Selwood - Shuey - Priddis (traded in) - Mcveigh - Van Berlo - Hannebery (traded in) - Palmer - Mckenzie - Cooney

oh only 6 mids well that will be tough deciding :-\

[Jay]

Murphy - Selwood - Shuey - Priddis (traded in) - Mcveigh - Van Berlo - Hannebery (traded in) - Palmer - Mckenzie - Cooney

oh only 6 mids well that will be tough deciding :-\

you have already traded? :o

[picker_man]

Murphy - Selwood - Shuey - Priddis (traded in) - Mcveigh - Van Berlo - Hannebery (traded in) - Palmer - Mckenzie - Cooney

oh only 6 mids well that will be tough deciding :-\

you have already traded? :o

The quality players go quick, so yep its been confirmed between us both :)

[Holz]

The Elephants will be pushing for top 8. Just becuase the players are all young doesnt mean they arent any good.

Isn't everyone always pushing for the 8? Besides Tbag next year of course.

Nah I say pushing for 8 as in are a possible chance thats teams like the Roos, Essendon, Carlton, Freo etc... this year.

[BB67th]

Murphy - Selwood - Shuey - Priddis (traded in) - Mcveigh - Van Berlo - Hannebery (traded in) - Palmer - Mckenzie - Cooney

oh only 6 mids well that will be tough deciding :-\

you have already traded? :o

The quality players go quick, so yep its been confirmed between us both :)

Now why would you bother to trade to have 10 starting quality mids?

[picker_man]

beacuse i lost no player from backs, rucks or forwards to get it done ;)

[tbagrocks]

so to get this right, can I trade say Dangerfield for pick 1, so player for pick ???

[Colliwobblers]

so to get this right, can I trade say Dangerfield for pick 1, so player for pick ???

Yes as the pick becomes a player. So you both end up with the same (and Correct) list numbers.

Unusual tho possible to ONLY trade one player for one pick, but as long as the numbers be it picks or players are the same on each side of the trade it is fine.

Only players that change teams count as list movements not picks.

So a player for a player is ONE list movement.

A player for a pick is ONE list movement.

A pick for a pick is NO list movements. ( obviously a pick for a pick will only happen where players and or other picks are involved).

example player x + pick x  FOR player y + pick y   =   ONE list movement.