AXVs: Official Discussion Thread

Started by Colliwobblers, August 23, 2012, 01:44:14 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

PowerBug

Who notices anything with what I put up? :P
Leader of the King Karl Amon fan club
Coach of WXV side Rio De Janeiro Jaguars
2023 SC: Rank 126

tbagrocks

Quote from: PowerBug on October 26, 2016, 02:03:37 PM
Because I can.....

Using the squads listed on UF so these are pre-trades



















TeamTotal GamesTotal PointsAverageTop 15 avgPlayed 11+ games
Bangkok53957230106.18126.0526
Australia58260959104.74124.3528
Sri Lanka57159024103.37121.4429
KL50952194102.54125.1928
Tibet46446732100.72117.7923
UAE5585558399.61115.6628
Mongolia5945836898.26118.1530
Vietnam4614351094.38107.9823
Laos5765422594.14115.7032
Turkey4674395894.13109.7624
Kathmandu5154801193.23113.4523
Taiwan5034627792.00103.3326
PNG4634220591.16108.2225
Manila4974403388.60102.5525
Bangladesh4193605186.04102.8220
Hong Kong4153249078.2989.5819
Hmmmm I would've thought Tibet would be a little higher is scoring :-\  Well we did miss a handful of our best 15 all year!

Interesting reading SS!

Nige


BB67th

Quote from: Ricochet on October 28, 2016, 04:35:37 PM
Just a few changes at KL

Retired:
Pears
Enright
Dal Santo
Malceski

Patfull

Delisted:
TCurren
Adamson
Gault
Hams

and JSmith as a top up

Gibbs for Malceski and Dal Santo a few seasons ago worked out alright for me in the end ;)

Adamant

Gibbs probably wouldn't even start for KL anyway. :P

Ricochet

Quote from: BB67th on October 28, 2016, 06:16:38 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on October 28, 2016, 04:35:37 PM
Just a few changes at KL

Retired:
Pears
Enright
Dal Santo
Malceski

Patfull

Delisted:
TCurren
Adamson
Gault
Hams

and JSmith as a top up

Gibbs for Malceski and Dal Santo a few seasons ago worked out alright for me in the end ;)
Haha yep was talking to Ele about it earlier. Would definitely love Gibbs now!

nas

With the following would the AXV's follow & remove the Rookie Lists, or maybe consider doing it before? Know that has been discussed before in rule changes as well.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/afl-rookies-could-be-eligible-to-play-from-round-1-expanded-lists-as-soon-as-2018/news-story/4b9f814f27debec43c03fcf969477483

Rusty00

Once the AFL remove them, there's no real point us keeping them I wouldn't have thought.

Might be a bit late to consider removing them in AXVs for next season though as people have traded based on rookie elevations and the draft is not far away now.

BB67th

Definitely something to look at for next off-season, too late to do anything about rookie lists now unfortunately.

Ricochet

Yeh I agree, would have to be next year imo

iZander

Quote from: Ricochet on November 18, 2016, 11:38:39 AM
Yeh I agree, would have to be next year imo
Yeah agreed it would be too big of a loss to those teams that traded for 6th rounders to upgrade rookies! They arent cheap!

Ricochet

Quote from: iZander on November 18, 2016, 11:57:06 AM
Quote from: Ricochet on November 18, 2016, 11:38:39 AM
Yeh I agree, would have to be next year imo
Yeah agreed it would be too big of a loss to those teams that traded for 6th rounders to upgrade rookies! They arent cheap!
Ha damn straight

But had this one in mind

Bangkok give: nat 49
Sri Lanka give: rook 28

iZander

Quote from: Ricochet on November 18, 2016, 12:02:28 PM
Quote from: iZander on November 18, 2016, 11:57:06 AM
Quote from: Ricochet on November 18, 2016, 11:38:39 AM
Yeh I agree, would have to be next year imo
Yeah agreed it would be too big of a loss to those teams that traded for 6th rounders to upgrade rookies! They arent cheap!
Ha damn straight

But had this one in mind

Bangkok give: nat 49
Sri Lanka give: rook 28
hahahahaha, not cheap at all :P

But seriously, just get rid of it, just annoying throughout the season and this comps already a year behind some dont make it 2!!!

iZander

Quote from: iZander on November 18, 2016, 12:28:40 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on November 18, 2016, 12:02:28 PM
Quote from: iZander on November 18, 2016, 11:57:06 AM
Quote from: Ricochet on November 18, 2016, 11:38:39 AM
Yeh I agree, would have to be next year imo
Yeah agreed it would be too big of a loss to those teams that traded for 6th rounders to upgrade rookies! They arent cheap!
Ha damn straight

But had this one in mind

Bangkok give: nat 49
Sri Lanka give: rook 28
hahahahaha, not cheap at all :P

But seriously, just get rid of it, just annoying throughout the season and this comps already a year behind some dont make it 2!!!

And lets be honest, it wont make a difference. I played rookies last year and no1 noticed. I could of ungraded them just couldnt be bothered. Yep, im lazy haha.

fanTCfool

Quote from: iZander on November 18, 2016, 12:30:35 PM
Quote from: iZander on November 18, 2016, 12:28:40 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on November 18, 2016, 12:02:28 PM
Quote from: iZander on November 18, 2016, 11:57:06 AM
Quote from: Ricochet on November 18, 2016, 11:38:39 AM
Yeh I agree, would have to be next year imo
Yeah agreed it would be too big of a loss to those teams that traded for 6th rounders to upgrade rookies! They arent cheap!
Ha damn straight

But had this one in mind

Bangkok give: nat 49
Sri Lanka give: rook 28
hahahahaha, not cheap at all :P

But seriously, just get rid of it, just annoying throughout the season and this comps already a year behind some dont make it 2!!!

And lets be honest, it wont make a difference. I played rookies last year and no1 noticed. I could of ungraded them just couldnt be bothered. Yep, im lazy haha.

Did you just admit to cheating the system?  :o