AFL Team Draft - Results, Banter and Discussion

Started by Scrads, August 20, 2012, 02:01:34 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Jukes

This is flowering stupid this obvious bias is unbelievable, my team was top 4 for sure not bottom 3.

KoopKicka

Quote from: Jukes on September 02, 2012, 08:13:45 PM
This is flowering stupid this obvious bias is unbelievable, my team was top 4 for sure not bottom 3.

More importantly, HOW THE flower DID I COME LAST! BEHIND SPINK! :'(

Not that Im having a whinge, Im just quite shocked

Scrads

Guys please do not complain, the judges were selected at the start and everybody was happy with them.

The competition was VERY even. Each team was given 5 ratings out of 10 for each category by 5 judges. So, the average rating for each team was:

Team A: 8.28
Team B: 8.26
Team C: 8.18
Team D: 8.10

Cleveland Cavaliers (Holz) - 8.06
Boston Celtics (monstrum) - 7.90
LA Lakers (BB) - 7.80
New York Knicks (Spinking) - 7.76
New Orleans Hornets (whatlez) - 7.68
OKC Thunder (Jukes) - 7.60
Harlem Globetrotters (Meow) - 7.58
Seattle Sonics (Koop) - 7.54

So the difference between first and last place was 0.74 of a vote for every single rating. that is exceptionally close if you ask me.


Holz

not complaining scrads, the scoring system and judging was very fair.

there will always be a few people unhappy just like there is when the AA team is announced. Will be very interesting to see who can get up for the win.

Did you say people gave a little info on why the scored what they did? if so this would be a very interesting read.

JBs-Hawks

Quote from: Jukes on September 02, 2012, 08:13:45 PM
This is flowering stupid this obvious bias is unbelievable, my team was top 4 for sure not bottom 3.

Because no one rates stanton like you do ;)

Scrads

Quote from: Holzman on September 02, 2012, 08:37:53 PM
not complaining scrads, the scoring system and judging was very fair.

there will always be a few people unhappy just like there is when the AA team is announced. Will be very interesting to see who can get up for the win.

Did you say people gave a little info on why the scored what they did? if so this would be a very interesting read.
Was not accusing you Holz, honestly that was more aimed at Jukes.

Quote from: Jukes on September 02, 2012, 08:13:45 PM
This is flowering stupid this obvious bias is unbelievable, my team was top 4 for sure not bottom 3.

Not sure where the bias comes in, there was a reason there were 5 judges so that results would be 'averaged' out.

RE the judging: No not really, one judge did for two teams but I told them the others judges weren't doing it and was not necessary so he stopped. If you like, I might ask the judges to make a small statement about the teams that I can include with the ratings when they are revealed.

Jukes

Quote from: Scrads on September 02, 2012, 08:43:46 PM
If you like, I might ask the judges to make a small statement about the teams that I can include with the ratings when they are revealed.

yeah do this, I'm 95% sure all the judges and you COLLUDED together against me because of Stants.

Scrads

Quote from: Jukes on September 02, 2012, 08:47:01 PM
Quote from: Scrads on September 02, 2012, 08:43:46 PM
If you like, I might ask the judges to make a small statement about the teams that I can include with the ratings when they are revealed.

yeah do this, I'm 95% sure all the judges and you COLLUDED together against me because of Stants.

Mate, FYI I have never said a bad word to you about Stants. Go look at my posts. The judging was done over 5 categories so even if the judges for some reason marked you down for Stants, it would affect your score by very little.

KoopKicka

Quote from: Scrads on September 02, 2012, 09:03:23 PM
Quote from: Jukes on September 02, 2012, 08:47:01 PM
Quote from: Scrads on September 02, 2012, 08:43:46 PM
If you like, I might ask the judges to make a small statement about the teams that I can include with the ratings when they are revealed.

yeah do this, I'm 95% sure all the judges and you COLLUDED together against me because of Stants.

Mate, FYI I have never said a bad word to you about Stants. Go look at my posts. The judging was done over 5 categories so even if the judges for some reason marked you down for Stants, it would affect your score by very little.

Its all good scrads, wasnt having a go at you mate, was just incredibly shocked.


Holz

Quote from: Jukes on September 02, 2012, 08:13:45 PM
This is flowering stupid this obvious bias is unbelievable, my team was top 4 for sure not bottom 3.

I do like your team jukes, i didnt have it in my top 4 though. Seems all legit to me. Its opinion based so cant argue with peoples opinions.

Jukes

As I've been saying on chat and fb chat, this whole competition is suspect and from my view null and void due to obvious collusion and hate.

Justin Bieber


LaHug


Noz

First he complains about not getting Stanton at first now he complains about his positioning.